State-Organized Starvation: A Weapon of Extreme Mass Violence in Matabeleland South, 1984

Q3 Social Sciences Genocide Studies International Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.3138/GSI.12.1.03
Hazel M. G. Cameron
{"title":"State-Organized Starvation: A Weapon of Extreme Mass Violence in Matabeleland South, 1984","authors":"Hazel M. G. Cameron","doi":"10.3138/GSI.12.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper explores an episode of state led extreme mass violence in Zimbabwe, commonly referred to as Gukurahundi, with a specific focus on the second phase of the campaign in Matabeleland South in early 1984. During this phase, the state targeted both the political structure of the main political opposition party of ZAPU, as well as the minority Ndebele ethnic group from which ZAPU drew much of its grassroots level political support. Between February and April 1984, the Government of Zimbabwe used food as a political and military weapon of coercion, torture, punishment, and death against the Ndebele people of Matabeleland South. Analysis of (a) transcripts of interviews with survivors and witnesses, and (b) official government communications, between the US Department of State and the American embassy in Harare during 1984, obtained by Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, sheds a critical new lens on the policy of starvation and punishment. The original sources compiled in this study provide evidence of: (1) the suffering of the innocent Ndebele victims of state crime, (2) the knowledge that was available to the Western diplomatic community, (3) the response of the US government to the atrocities, and (4) the response of the Government of Zimbabwe to the atrocities. This study concludes that the deprivation of food supplies, which formed a significant element of this state campaign, deliberately brought between 350,000 and 400,000 people to the extreme edge of starvation in contravention of international law. Corroborating reports from credible sources evidences that these Zimbabwean state crimes resulted in the death of men, women, and children from starvation and dehydration as well as through injuries and illness exacerbated by hunger and malnutrition induced by the government's strict curfew and forced starvation.","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"12 1","pages":"26 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.12.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:This paper explores an episode of state led extreme mass violence in Zimbabwe, commonly referred to as Gukurahundi, with a specific focus on the second phase of the campaign in Matabeleland South in early 1984. During this phase, the state targeted both the political structure of the main political opposition party of ZAPU, as well as the minority Ndebele ethnic group from which ZAPU drew much of its grassroots level political support. Between February and April 1984, the Government of Zimbabwe used food as a political and military weapon of coercion, torture, punishment, and death against the Ndebele people of Matabeleland South. Analysis of (a) transcripts of interviews with survivors and witnesses, and (b) official government communications, between the US Department of State and the American embassy in Harare during 1984, obtained by Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, sheds a critical new lens on the policy of starvation and punishment. The original sources compiled in this study provide evidence of: (1) the suffering of the innocent Ndebele victims of state crime, (2) the knowledge that was available to the Western diplomatic community, (3) the response of the US government to the atrocities, and (4) the response of the Government of Zimbabwe to the atrocities. This study concludes that the deprivation of food supplies, which formed a significant element of this state campaign, deliberately brought between 350,000 and 400,000 people to the extreme edge of starvation in contravention of international law. Corroborating reports from credible sources evidences that these Zimbabwean state crimes resulted in the death of men, women, and children from starvation and dehydration as well as through injuries and illness exacerbated by hunger and malnutrition induced by the government's strict curfew and forced starvation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家组织的饥饿:马塔贝莱兰南部极端大规模暴力的武器,1984年
摘要:本文探讨了津巴布韦国家主导的极端大规模暴力事件,通常被称为Gukurahundi,特别关注1984年初在南马塔贝莱兰(Matabeleland South)发生的第二阶段运动。在这一阶段,国家的目标是ZAPU主要政治反对党的政治结构,以及少数民族恩德贝勒族,ZAPU从他们那里获得了很多基层政治支持。1984年2月至4月期间,津巴布韦政府将粮食作为政治和军事武器,对南马塔贝莱兰的恩德贝勒人进行胁迫、酷刑、惩罚和死亡。根据《信息自由法》(Freedom of Information, FOI)的要求,对1984年美国国务院和美国驻哈拉雷大使馆之间的幸存者和证人访谈记录,以及(b)官方政府通信进行分析,为饥饿和惩罚政策提供了重要的新视角。本研究汇编的原始资料提供了以下证据:(1)无辜的恩德贝勒人遭受国家罪行的苦难,(2)西方外交界所掌握的知识,(3)美国政府对暴行的反应,以及(4)津巴布韦政府对暴行的反应。这项研究的结论是,剥夺粮食供应是这一国家运动的重要组成部分,蓄意使35万至40万人处于饥饿的极端边缘,这违反了国际法。来自可靠来源的相互印证的报告证明,津巴布韦的这些国家罪行导致男子、妇女和儿童死于饥饿和脱水,以及因政府严格宵禁和强迫饥饿造成的饥饿和营养不良而加剧的受伤和疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Armenian Genocide Studies: Development as a Field, Historiographic Appraisal, and the Road Ahead Penal Battalions and Genocidal Warfare: History's Warnings, Wagner's Global Footprint, and Ukraine What Obligation Does the Global Community Have to Prevent Genocide, and What Form(s) Should these Prevention Efforts Take? Quality Genocide Education in American Schools: An Armenian Lens for Hope From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1