Loneliness in later life: a cross-sectional survey analysis of place-based factors in Ireland

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Quality in Ageing and Older Adults Pub Date : 2019-05-30 DOI:10.1108/QAOA-04-2018-0015
S. Gibney, Tara Moore, S. Shannon
{"title":"Loneliness in later life: a cross-sectional survey analysis of place-based factors in Ireland","authors":"S. Gibney, Tara Moore, S. Shannon","doi":"10.1108/QAOA-04-2018-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the age-friendliness of local environments and self-reported loneliness for a representative sample of community-dwelling adults aged 55+ in Ireland.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData were from the Healthy and Positive Ageing Initiative Age friendly Cities and Counties Survey (n=10,540) (2016). Several age friendly indicators, as proposed by World Health Organisation, were included in this study: outdoor spaces and buildings; access to social services; social participation; respect and social inclusion; and transport. Loneliness was measured using five items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Informed by an ecological approach to ageing, multi-level negative binomial regression models were used to investigate the association between each age friendly indicator and social loneliness. Models were adjusted for known demographic, socio-economic and health correlates of loneliness.\n\n\nFindings\nAverage loneliness scores were significantly higher for those in poorer health, who lived alone, were materially deprived and those never or formerly married. Lower ratings and poorer outcomes for several interrelated age friendly place-based factors were significantly associated with higher loneliness scores: difficulty with transport, difficulty accessing social services, barriers to community activities, lower social engagement, and experiences and perceptions of ageism in the community; however, the effect sizes were small.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study identified several modifiable age friendly features of local environments that are associated with loneliness in this older population. The results of this study can inform coordinated local and national efforts to enhance the age-friendliness of local environments and reduce the risk and experience of loneliness among the ageing population in Ireland.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/QAOA-04-2018-0015","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-04-2018-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the age-friendliness of local environments and self-reported loneliness for a representative sample of community-dwelling adults aged 55+ in Ireland. Design/methodology/approach Data were from the Healthy and Positive Ageing Initiative Age friendly Cities and Counties Survey (n=10,540) (2016). Several age friendly indicators, as proposed by World Health Organisation, were included in this study: outdoor spaces and buildings; access to social services; social participation; respect and social inclusion; and transport. Loneliness was measured using five items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Informed by an ecological approach to ageing, multi-level negative binomial regression models were used to investigate the association between each age friendly indicator and social loneliness. Models were adjusted for known demographic, socio-economic and health correlates of loneliness. Findings Average loneliness scores were significantly higher for those in poorer health, who lived alone, were materially deprived and those never or formerly married. Lower ratings and poorer outcomes for several interrelated age friendly place-based factors were significantly associated with higher loneliness scores: difficulty with transport, difficulty accessing social services, barriers to community activities, lower social engagement, and experiences and perceptions of ageism in the community; however, the effect sizes were small. Originality/value This study identified several modifiable age friendly features of local environments that are associated with loneliness in this older population. The results of this study can inform coordinated local and national efforts to enhance the age-friendliness of local environments and reduce the risk and experience of loneliness among the ageing population in Ireland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚年的孤独:爱尔兰地域因素的横断面调查分析
目的本文旨在调查爱尔兰55岁以上社区居住成年人的代表性样本中,当地环境的年龄友好性与自我报告的孤独感之间的关系。设计/方法/方法数据来自健康积极老龄化倡议老年友好型城市和县调查(n=10540)(2016)。世界卫生组织提出的几个年龄友好指标被纳入了这项研究:户外空间和建筑;获得社会服务;社会参与;尊重和社会包容;以及运输。使用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表中的五个项目来测量孤独感。在生态学老龄化方法的指导下,使用多层次负二项回归模型来研究每个年龄友好指标与社会孤独感之间的关系。根据已知的人口统计学、社会经济和健康与孤独的相关性对模型进行了调整。发现那些健康状况较差、独自生活、物质匮乏以及从未或以前结婚的人的平均孤独感得分要高得多。几个相互关联的基于年龄友好的地方因素的评分较低和结果较差与较高的孤独感得分显著相关:交通困难、难以获得社会服务、社区活动障碍、社会参与度较低以及社区中的年龄歧视经历和认知;然而,效果的大小很小。独创性/价值这项研究确定了当地环境中与老年人孤独感相关的几个可改变的年龄友好特征。这项研究的结果可以为地方和国家协调努力提供信息,以提高当地环境的年龄友好性,降低爱尔兰老龄化人口的孤独风险和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice The relationship between older adults’ perceptions of ageing and depression: a systematic review Participatory action research and empowerment of nursing home residents Cognitive functioning and life satisfaction as predictors of subjective health complaints in elderly people Editorial: Recognising new partners and activities in older peoples’ care but also potential burdens in new forms of care and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1