{"title":"Analysis of the Six Preliminary Injunctions Granted in Legal Challenges to COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Federal Contractors","authors":"M. Herrmann","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2021, the Biden administration issued an executive order requiring companies that enter into federal contracts to require and verify that their employees are vaccinated against COVID-19. The executive order has since been challenged in multiple federal district courts. As of the date of submission, six preliminary injunctions have been issued, temporarily ceasing enforcement of the order. This paper is an analysis and summary of the arguments presented and legal reasoning of the courts based on the published court opinions. The key issue common among all six cases was whether the executive order exceeded the scope of authority granted under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act. The courts reached slightly different conclusions on this issue and had different reasoning, but all issued temporary injunctions. Although most of the injunctions were limited to the plaintiff states, the most notable preliminary injunction was issued by the Southern District of Georgia and was the only one to be issued nationwide. The inclusion of the Associated Builders and Contractors as a plaintiff in that case played a key role in the scope of the injunction being issued on a nationwide scale. Appeals are pending in all cases but given the broad scope of the mandate and the current status of the pandemic, the government faces a difficult appeal. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":46126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
对联邦承包商新冠肺炎疫苗授权法律挑战中批准的六项初步禁令的分析
2021年9月,拜登政府发布了一项行政命令,要求签订联邦合同的公司要求并核实其员工接种了新冠肺炎疫苗。此后,该行政命令在多个联邦地区法院受到质疑。截至提交之日,已发布六项初步禁令,暂时停止执行该命令。本文根据已发表的法院意见,对法院提出的论点和法律推理进行了分析和总结。所有六起案件中共同的关键问题是,行政命令是否超出了《联邦财产和行政服务法》赋予的权力范围。法院在这个问题上得出了略有不同的结论,也有不同的理由,但都发布了临时禁令。尽管大多数禁令仅限于原告州,但最引人注目的初步禁令是由佐治亚州南区发布的,也是唯一一个在全国范围内发布的禁令。联合建筑商和承包商作为该案的原告,在全国范围内发布禁令的范围中发挥了关键作用。所有案件的上诉都悬而未决,但考虑到任务的广泛范围和疫情的现状,政府面临着艰难的上诉。©2023美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。