A Comparative Study for the Effect of Some Petroleum Products on the Engineering Properties of Gypseous Soils

Q3 Environmental Science Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-15 DOI:10.25130/tjes.29.3.7
Asal Mahmud Hamad, M. Jassam
{"title":"A Comparative Study for the Effect of Some Petroleum Products on the Engineering Properties of Gypseous Soils","authors":"Asal Mahmud Hamad, M. Jassam","doi":"10.25130/tjes.29.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gypseous soils are considered problematic soils because the soil cavities happen during receiving the water or this type of soil and solving gypsum materials and contract in a soil volume. In this study, three types of gypseous soils are used; soil1, soil2, and soil3 with gypsum content (28.71%, 43.6%, and 54.88%) respectively, petroleum products (engine oil, fuel oil, and kerosene) are added to the soils with percentages (3%, 6%, 9%, and 12%) for each product. The result showed that specific gravity, liquid limit, optimum moisture content (O.M.C), and maximum dry density decreased with an increased percentage of product for all types of products. The direct shear (dry and soaked case) results show that increasing the (angle of internal friction and the soil cohesion) for soil1, soil2, and soil3 by adding engine oil and fuel oil. Still, when the soils were treated with kerosene, the angle of internal friction increased while cohesion decreased. The collapse potential for the treated soils increases with increasing gypsum content for all petroleum products. The collapse potential (CP) for (soil1) decreased by 47% when using 6% of the engine oil, 48.8% when using 9% of the fuel oil, and 55% when using 9% of the kerosene. The same percentage of the petroleum products (engine oil, fuel oil, and kerosene) decrease the collapse potential for (soil2), (47%, 46%, and 50%) respectively and decrease the collapse potential for (soil 3), (51%, 47.7%, and 52%) respectively. In the unconfined compressive test applied on (soil1) using maximum density, the results show that the soil strength increased (26% and 10%) when using 6% and engine oil and fuel oil, respectively, while the soil strength decreased by 29% when treated with 9% of kerosene.","PeriodicalId":30589,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.29.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Gypseous soils are considered problematic soils because the soil cavities happen during receiving the water or this type of soil and solving gypsum materials and contract in a soil volume. In this study, three types of gypseous soils are used; soil1, soil2, and soil3 with gypsum content (28.71%, 43.6%, and 54.88%) respectively, petroleum products (engine oil, fuel oil, and kerosene) are added to the soils with percentages (3%, 6%, 9%, and 12%) for each product. The result showed that specific gravity, liquid limit, optimum moisture content (O.M.C), and maximum dry density decreased with an increased percentage of product for all types of products. The direct shear (dry and soaked case) results show that increasing the (angle of internal friction and the soil cohesion) for soil1, soil2, and soil3 by adding engine oil and fuel oil. Still, when the soils were treated with kerosene, the angle of internal friction increased while cohesion decreased. The collapse potential for the treated soils increases with increasing gypsum content for all petroleum products. The collapse potential (CP) for (soil1) decreased by 47% when using 6% of the engine oil, 48.8% when using 9% of the fuel oil, and 55% when using 9% of the kerosene. The same percentage of the petroleum products (engine oil, fuel oil, and kerosene) decrease the collapse potential for (soil2), (47%, 46%, and 50%) respectively and decrease the collapse potential for (soil 3), (51%, 47.7%, and 52%) respectively. In the unconfined compressive test applied on (soil1) using maximum density, the results show that the soil strength increased (26% and 10%) when using 6% and engine oil and fuel oil, respectively, while the soil strength decreased by 29% when treated with 9% of kerosene.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
几种石油产品对石膏土工程性质影响的比较研究
石膏土被认为是有问题的土壤,因为在接受水或这种类型的土壤和溶解石膏材料并在土壤体积中收缩的过程中发生了土壤空洞。在本研究中,使用了三种类型的石膏土;将石膏含量分别为28.71%、43.6%和54.88%的Soil1、soil2和soil3,以及石油产品(机油、燃料油和煤油)按每种产品的百分比(3%、6%、9%和12%)加入土壤中。结果表明:各类型产品的比重、液限、最佳含水率(O.M.C)和最大干密度均随产品掺量的增加而减小;直接剪切(干、浸水)试验结果表明,添加机油和燃料油可以增加土1、土2和土3的内摩擦角和土黏聚力。煤油处理后,内摩擦角增大,黏聚力减小。随着所有石油产品石膏含量的增加,处理过的土壤塌陷的可能性增大。当使用6%的机油时,土壤的崩溃电位(CP)下降了47%,当使用9%的燃料油时,CP下降了48.8%,当使用9%的煤油时,CP下降了55%。相同比例的石油产品(机油、燃料油和煤油)分别降低(土壤2)(47%、46%和50%)和(土壤3)(51%、47.7%和52%)的崩溃潜力。采用最大密度对(土1)进行无侧限压缩试验,结果表明:添加6%的机油和燃料油时,土强度分别提高26%和10%,添加9%的煤油时,土强度降低29%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Generative AI Chatbot for Engineering Scientific Journal MnO2 Nano Particles Modified a Double Layer Cathode Reactor for an Efficient Removal of DBT in Diesel Underwater Wireless Optical Communication for IOT using Coding MIMO Diversity Climate Change’s Impacts on Drought in Upper Zab Basin, Iraq: A Case Study Cascaded H–Bridge Multilevel Inverter: Review of Topologies and Pulse Width Modulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1