Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Diverse, Underresourced Youth Using Telehealth: Advancing Equity Through Consumer Perspectives

M. Castro, R. J. Rodríguez, Bradley O. Hudson, V. R. Weersing, M. Kipke, Brad Peterson, A. West
{"title":"Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Diverse, Underresourced Youth Using Telehealth: Advancing Equity Through Consumer Perspectives","authors":"M. Castro, R. J. Rodríguez, Bradley O. Hudson, V. R. Weersing, M. Kipke, Brad Peterson, A. West","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2022.2062687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this qualitative study was to capture the perspectives of individuals representing an urban, predominantly Latinx community who are underresourced by mental health services about the use of telehealth to deliver mental health treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic required hospital- and community-based mental health programs to pivot to telehealth with alarming speed and very little opportunity to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and disparate impact on unique populations of patients. This study aimed to assess perceived strengths and limitations of telehealth mental health service delivery via qualitative focus group methods. Three focus groups were conducted with 13 youth (aged 8–17) who were being treated at an urban, academic children’s hospital serving a predominantly Latinx community mental health population; two focus groups were conducted with 19 parents of said children; and one focus group was conducted with four mental health providers providing services to this population. A coding schema was designed to capture themes relevant to the following: (1) privacy and confidentiality; (2) perceived limitations of telehealth; (3) comfort with telehealth; (4) therapeutic relationship; (5) perceived strengths of telehealth; (6) perceived safety of telehealth; and (7) advice for providers engaging in telehealth. Findings were illustrative of both perceived strengths and limitations across these domains that can inform optimized telehealth mental health services moving forward.","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"8 1","pages":"206 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2022.2062687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this qualitative study was to capture the perspectives of individuals representing an urban, predominantly Latinx community who are underresourced by mental health services about the use of telehealth to deliver mental health treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic required hospital- and community-based mental health programs to pivot to telehealth with alarming speed and very little opportunity to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and disparate impact on unique populations of patients. This study aimed to assess perceived strengths and limitations of telehealth mental health service delivery via qualitative focus group methods. Three focus groups were conducted with 13 youth (aged 8–17) who were being treated at an urban, academic children’s hospital serving a predominantly Latinx community mental health population; two focus groups were conducted with 19 parents of said children; and one focus group was conducted with four mental health providers providing services to this population. A coding schema was designed to capture themes relevant to the following: (1) privacy and confidentiality; (2) perceived limitations of telehealth; (3) comfort with telehealth; (4) therapeutic relationship; (5) perceived strengths of telehealth; (6) perceived safety of telehealth; and (7) advice for providers engaging in telehealth. Findings were illustrative of both perceived strengths and limitations across these domains that can inform optimized telehealth mental health services moving forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供认知行为治疗与不同,资源不足的青少年使用远程医疗:通过消费者的观点推进公平
摘要:这项定性研究的目的是捕捉代表以拉丁裔为主的城市社区的个人对使用远程医疗提供心理健康治疗的看法,这些人在心理健康服务方面资源不足。新冠肺炎大流行要求医院和社区心理健康项目以惊人的速度转向远程医疗,几乎没有机会评估其可行性、可接受性和对独特患者群体的不同影响。本研究旨在通过定性焦点小组方法评估远程医疗心理健康服务提供的优势和局限性。对13名青年(8-17岁)进行了三个重点小组的研究,他们在一家城市学术儿童医院接受治疗,该医院主要为拉丁裔社区心理健康人群服务;对所述儿童的19名家长进行了两个焦点小组;一个重点小组由四名心理健康提供者组成,为这一人群提供服务。设计了一个编码模式,以捕捉与以下内容相关的主题:(1)隐私和保密;(2) 远程医疗的感知局限性;(3) 远程医疗的舒适度;(4) 治疗关系;(5) 远程医疗的感知优势;(6) 远程医疗的感知安全;以及(7)为从事远程医疗的提供者提供建议。研究结果说明了这些领域的优势和局限性,可以为优化远程医疗心理健康服务提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Improve in Partial Hospitalization Treatment for Adolescents with and without Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Leveraging Measurement-Based Care and Electronic Health Record Data Collaborative Safety Planning with Youth during a Suicide-Related Emergency: Developmental and Family Considerations Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Open Trial of a Telehealth Adaptation of Team-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Pediatric Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1