Al-Quds as Mentioned in UN Resolutions

Mohammed ABU OUN
{"title":"Al-Quds as Mentioned in UN Resolutions","authors":"Mohammed ABU OUN","doi":"10.31456/beytulmakdis.1164940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Quds (Jerusalem) has always enjoyed a special standing in the world for either its historic and civilised position, or for its geographically strategic location in the centre of the Arab region and the Old-World continents. Due to its importance, its issues were paid attention to on the global arena by major countries and international institutes, particularly the United Nations and its institutes. This is what prompted these institutions to express their positions on this issue, which is what we seek to address during this study. This study addresses four main claims: 1) the most prominent UN institutes influencing the Palestinian issue, 2) UN resolutions before 1967, 3) UN resolutions from 1967-1993, and 4) UN resolutions after 1993. It adopts a descriptive analysis methodology, and concludes that al-Quds is an occupied Palestinian city as described in the International Law, the international community's complicity with the occupation contributed to the Judaisation and seizure of the holy city, and the international resolutions failed to deter the occupation from violating the law. The study also recommends shedding light on the Israeli occupation, its crimes against the Palestinians, and its violations against international law in the international forums. Moreover, it recommends exerting pressure on the countries supporting the occupation through building Arab and Muslim lobbies that work on breaking the relation between those countries and the occupation, and mobilising them to support Palestinians' rights.","PeriodicalId":34205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Jerusalem Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Jerusalem Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31456/beytulmakdis.1164940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Al-Quds (Jerusalem) has always enjoyed a special standing in the world for either its historic and civilised position, or for its geographically strategic location in the centre of the Arab region and the Old-World continents. Due to its importance, its issues were paid attention to on the global arena by major countries and international institutes, particularly the United Nations and its institutes. This is what prompted these institutions to express their positions on this issue, which is what we seek to address during this study. This study addresses four main claims: 1) the most prominent UN institutes influencing the Palestinian issue, 2) UN resolutions before 1967, 3) UN resolutions from 1967-1993, and 4) UN resolutions after 1993. It adopts a descriptive analysis methodology, and concludes that al-Quds is an occupied Palestinian city as described in the International Law, the international community's complicity with the occupation contributed to the Judaisation and seizure of the holy city, and the international resolutions failed to deter the occupation from violating the law. The study also recommends shedding light on the Israeli occupation, its crimes against the Palestinians, and its violations against international law in the international forums. Moreover, it recommends exerting pressure on the countries supporting the occupation through building Arab and Muslim lobbies that work on breaking the relation between those countries and the occupation, and mobilising them to support Palestinians' rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合国决议中提到的圣城
圣城(耶路撒冷)在世界上一直享有特殊地位,无论是因为其历史和文明地位,还是因为其位于阿拉伯地区和旧世界大陆中心的地理战略位置。由于其重要性,其问题在全球舞台上受到主要国家和国际机构,特别是联合国及其研究所的关注。这促使这些机构表达了他们对这个问题的立场,这也是我们在本研究中寻求解决的问题。这项研究涉及四个主要主张:1)影响巴勒斯坦问题的最著名的联合国机构,2)1967年之前的联合国决议,3)1967年至1993年的联合国安理会决议,以及4)1993年之后的联合国大会决议。它采用了描述性分析方法,并得出结论,圣城是《国际法》所述的一个被占领的巴勒斯坦城市,国际社会与占领的共谋促成了对圣城的犹太化和占领,国际决议未能阻止占领违反法律。该研究还建议在国际论坛上揭露以色列的占领、对巴勒斯坦人的罪行以及违反国际法的行为。此外,它建议通过建立阿拉伯和穆斯林游说团来向支持占领的国家施加压力,这些游说团致力于打破这些国家与占领之间的关系,并动员他们支持巴勒斯坦人的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Seyfu’l-Kudüs Savaşı Stratejik Dayanışma استعجال آرمجدون: مستقبل المسجد الأقصى في "صفقة القرن" في إطار الصهيونية المسيحية الأداء السياسي لحركة حماس خلال معركة سيف القدس في مايو 2021 مواقف الأمم المتحدة تجاه احتلال إسرائيل لغربي وشرقي القدس في سياق القانون الدولي Kudüs’teki Kadınların Filistin Mücadelesindeki Rolü (2000-2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1