Efficacy of tramadol versus dexamethasone in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block for forearm fractures. Does it make a difference?

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2238528
Wesam Nashat Ali, M. Bakri, M. Abdelrady, N. Bakri, Esraa Gamal Abdel Nasser Fathy, Ola Wahba
{"title":"Efficacy of tramadol versus dexamethasone in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block for forearm fractures. Does it make a difference?","authors":"Wesam Nashat Ali, M. Bakri, M. Abdelrady, N. Bakri, Esraa Gamal Abdel Nasser Fathy, Ola Wahba","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2238528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Application of supraclavicular block generally comprises elbow, forearm, and hand surgery. Tramadol and dexamethasone were tested and compared in the current study as adjuvants to levobupivacaine in the supraclavicular block. Patients and Methods 60 ASA Grade I and II patients of either sex, older than 18, participated in the current study. Two groups of patients were created: Group D (n = 30), who received 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 2 ml of dexamethasone (8 mg). 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 2 ml of 5% tramadol (100 mg) were given to Group T (n = 30). Statistics were used to compare the two groups. Results The tramadol group required substantially less time (13.4 ± 2.6 h) than the dexamethasone group (15.3 ± 2.8 h) for the first rescue analgesia request (P-value = 0.009). Within the first 24 hours following surgery, the mean total dose of rescue analgesia was considerably lower in group D (36 ± 12.2 mg) than in group T (44 ± 15.2 mg, P-value = 0.029). Group D had no side effects and considerably higher patient satisfaction (P = 0.042). Conclusion When levobupivacaine was used with dexamethasone in a supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm fractures, it worked better as an adjuvant than tramadol. Sensory and motor blockage, a quicker onset and longer duration of analgesia, and higher satisfaction levels were all present.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2238528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Application of supraclavicular block generally comprises elbow, forearm, and hand surgery. Tramadol and dexamethasone were tested and compared in the current study as adjuvants to levobupivacaine in the supraclavicular block. Patients and Methods 60 ASA Grade I and II patients of either sex, older than 18, participated in the current study. Two groups of patients were created: Group D (n = 30), who received 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 2 ml of dexamethasone (8 mg). 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 2 ml of 5% tramadol (100 mg) were given to Group T (n = 30). Statistics were used to compare the two groups. Results The tramadol group required substantially less time (13.4 ± 2.6 h) than the dexamethasone group (15.3 ± 2.8 h) for the first rescue analgesia request (P-value = 0.009). Within the first 24 hours following surgery, the mean total dose of rescue analgesia was considerably lower in group D (36 ± 12.2 mg) than in group T (44 ± 15.2 mg, P-value = 0.029). Group D had no side effects and considerably higher patient satisfaction (P = 0.042). Conclusion When levobupivacaine was used with dexamethasone in a supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm fractures, it worked better as an adjuvant than tramadol. Sensory and motor blockage, a quicker onset and longer duration of analgesia, and higher satisfaction levels were all present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲马多与地塞米松在超声引导下锁骨上阻滞治疗前臂骨折中的疗效。这有什么不同吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1