Conceptual and Institutional Prerequisites for Guiding Equitable Progress Towards Universal Rural Electrification

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.spel
Setu Pelz, Elina Brutschin, S. Pachauri
{"title":"Conceptual and Institutional Prerequisites for Guiding Equitable Progress Towards Universal Rural Electrification","authors":"Setu Pelz, Elina Brutschin, S. Pachauri","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.spel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rural electrification is a means to improving the socio-economic conditions and living standards of those living in rural areas. Yet, as global rural electrification efforts accelerate under the Sustainable Development Goals 7 (SDG 7), most policies and programs continue to solely target and be evaluated on extending connections, with mixed results. Despite increasing efforts to improve access to modern energy services in rural areas, progress is lagging and, in some cases, falling behind population growth. In fact, recent research suggests that even while new connections maybe provided, household access to essential energy services will still be very unequal even by 2030 without additional efforts. The few studies that have assessed recent cross country and within country variation in rural electrification performance using econometric techniques find this is linked with political systems, indicators such as corruption and government effectiveness and the institutional environment. As we approach the 2030 mark set under the UN SDGs, the IEA continues to project a severe deficit under the current policy scenario. More work must be done to understand drivers of rural electrification successes and transfer these lessons to countries where the deficit prevails despite ongoing efforts. Conceptual developments in energy access and energy poverty measurement encourage us to look beyond connection-based indicators towards improvement across distinct multi-dimensional supply attributes linked with energy services. Indeed, past work has shown that connection-based indicators fail to capture inequities in supply reliability, affordability and use. Moreover, there is very little precedent for linking rural electrification efforts with wider socio-economic and environmental impacts that ultimately justify the implementation of these policies. This is not limited to academic discourse, rather, the SDG 7.1 target itself speaks to the provision of reliable and affordable access to modern energy services for all. Further work is necessary to understand the limitations of connections-focused programs and suggest ways forward.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.11.1.spel","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural electrification is a means to improving the socio-economic conditions and living standards of those living in rural areas. Yet, as global rural electrification efforts accelerate under the Sustainable Development Goals 7 (SDG 7), most policies and programs continue to solely target and be evaluated on extending connections, with mixed results. Despite increasing efforts to improve access to modern energy services in rural areas, progress is lagging and, in some cases, falling behind population growth. In fact, recent research suggests that even while new connections maybe provided, household access to essential energy services will still be very unequal even by 2030 without additional efforts. The few studies that have assessed recent cross country and within country variation in rural electrification performance using econometric techniques find this is linked with political systems, indicators such as corruption and government effectiveness and the institutional environment. As we approach the 2030 mark set under the UN SDGs, the IEA continues to project a severe deficit under the current policy scenario. More work must be done to understand drivers of rural electrification successes and transfer these lessons to countries where the deficit prevails despite ongoing efforts. Conceptual developments in energy access and energy poverty measurement encourage us to look beyond connection-based indicators towards improvement across distinct multi-dimensional supply attributes linked with energy services. Indeed, past work has shown that connection-based indicators fail to capture inequities in supply reliability, affordability and use. Moreover, there is very little precedent for linking rural electrification efforts with wider socio-economic and environmental impacts that ultimately justify the implementation of these policies. This is not limited to academic discourse, rather, the SDG 7.1 target itself speaks to the provision of reliable and affordable access to modern energy services for all. Further work is necessary to understand the limitations of connections-focused programs and suggest ways forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指导公平推进农村普遍电气化的概念和制度先决条件
农村电气化是改善农村地区人民社会经济条件和生活水平的一种手段。然而,随着全球农村电气化工作在可持续发展目标7 (SDG 7)下的加速,大多数政策和计划仍然只针对扩大连接进行评估,结果好坏参半。尽管加大努力改善农村地区获得现代能源服务的机会,但进展滞后,在某些情况下还落后于人口增长。事实上,最近的研究表明,即使可能提供新的连接,如果没有额外的努力,即使到2030年,家庭获得基本能源服务的机会仍然会非常不平等。利用计量经济学技术评估最近农村电气化绩效的跨国和国内差异的少数研究发现,这与政治制度、腐败和政府效率等指标以及体制环境有关。随着我们接近联合国可持续发展目标设定的2030年目标,国际能源署继续预测,在目前的政策情景下,将出现严重的赤字。必须做更多的工作来了解农村电气化成功的驱动因素,并将这些经验教训传授给那些尽管不断努力仍普遍存在电力不足的国家。能源获取和能源贫困衡量方面的概念发展,鼓励我们超越以连接为基础的指标,着眼于改善与能源服务相关的不同多维供应属性。事实上,过去的研究表明,基于连接的指标未能反映供应可靠性、可负担性和使用方面的不平等。此外,很少有先例将农村电气化工作与更广泛的社会经济和环境影响联系起来,最终证明这些政策的实施是合理的。这不仅局限于学术论述,可持续发展目标7.1本身就涉及为所有人提供可靠和负担得起的现代能源服务。进一步的工作是必要的,以了解以连接为中心的程序的局限性,并提出前进的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Energy Network Innovation for Green Transition: Economic Issues and Regulatory Options Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition Socio-technical Inertia: Understanding the Barriers to Distributed Generation in Pakistan Residential Welfare-Loss from Electricity Supply Interruptions in South Africa: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource Subsidy Programs Cost Efficiency Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants in Bangladesh Using a Two-Stage DEA Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1