Theological Education in Australia 1964–2020: Intellectual Authority in a Changing Socio-Political Landscape*

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.1111/1467-9809.12945
Geoffrey R. Treloar
{"title":"Theological Education in Australia 1964–2020: Intellectual Authority in a Changing Socio-Political Landscape*","authors":"Geoffrey R. Treloar","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.12945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the intellectual authority of theological education in modern Australia by tracing its provision from one set of arrangements (the first settlement) inherited from the nineteenth century to another (the second settlement) in the half century from the mid-1960s to ca. 2020. The paper investigates what happened when the exclusion of Theology from the public higher education system was reversed by the Martin Report of 1964, with particular reference to the legitimacy and authority of Theology as public knowledge. A survey of the landmark developments in this transformation, the paper is divided into two parts. Relations of the theological education sector with the structures of the regulatory environment of higher education are examined in the first. Developments within the sector itself are considered in the second. It is argued that the confluence of these two streams has transformed the nature and public standing of Australian theological education. Paradoxically this dramatic improvement coincided with decline in the social salience of Christianity itself, a development which posed afresh the question of the legitimacy of theological knowledge in a way that raises the perennial issue of the relation between Christianity and culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":"47 4","pages":"538-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.12945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the intellectual authority of theological education in modern Australia by tracing its provision from one set of arrangements (the first settlement) inherited from the nineteenth century to another (the second settlement) in the half century from the mid-1960s to ca. 2020. The paper investigates what happened when the exclusion of Theology from the public higher education system was reversed by the Martin Report of 1964, with particular reference to the legitimacy and authority of Theology as public knowledge. A survey of the landmark developments in this transformation, the paper is divided into two parts. Relations of the theological education sector with the structures of the regulatory environment of higher education are examined in the first. Developments within the sector itself are considered in the second. It is argued that the confluence of these two streams has transformed the nature and public standing of Australian theological education. Paradoxically this dramatic improvement coincided with decline in the social salience of Christianity itself, a development which posed afresh the question of the legitimacy of theological knowledge in a way that raises the perennial issue of the relation between Christianity and culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚神学教育1964-2020:不断变化的社会政治景观中的知识权威*
本文探讨了现代澳大利亚神学教育的知识权威,追溯了从 20 世纪 60 年代中期到 2020 年左右的半个世纪中,神学教育从一套从 19 世纪继承下来的安排(第一套安排)到另一套安排(第二套安排)的发展历程。本文探讨了 1964 年马丁报告扭转了神学被排斥在公立高等教育体系之外的局面,特别是神学作为公共知识的合法性和权威性。本文对这一转变过程中具有里程碑意义的发展进行了调查,分为两个部分。第一部分探讨了神学教育部门与高等教育监管环境结构之间的关系。第二部分探讨了神学教育部门自身的发展。本文认为,这两股力量的交汇改变了澳大利亚神学教育的性质和公众地位。令人啼笑皆非的是,在神学教育取得巨大进步的同时,基督教本身的社会显著性却在下降,这一发展重新提出了神学知识的合法性问题,并引发了基督教与文化之间关系的长期问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information David A. Hollinger, Christianity's American Fate: How Religion Became more Conservative and Society More Secular. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press 2022; pp. xiv + 199. Issue Information Yue Fengand , Lin Feng: James Legge: A Critical Biography. Jinan: Shandong Educational Press, 2023; pp. 398. Sergio M. González: Strangers No Longer: Latino Belonging and Faith in Twentieth-Century Wisconsin. Latinos in Chicago and the Midwest Series. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2024; pp. ix + 292
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1