Assessment of Lifestyle Experiences across Lifespan and Cognitive Ageing in the Indian Context

IF 0.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology and Developing Societies Pub Date : 2020-08-17 DOI:10.1177/0971333620937512
A. Paplikar, Divya Ballal, F. Varghese, Jala Sireesha, R. Dwivedi, A. Rajan, Shailaja Mekala, F. Arshad, S. Kaul, S. Alladi
{"title":"Assessment of Lifestyle Experiences across Lifespan and Cognitive Ageing in the Indian Context","authors":"A. Paplikar, Divya Ballal, F. Varghese, Jala Sireesha, R. Dwivedi, A. Rajan, Shailaja Mekala, F. Arshad, S. Kaul, S. Alladi","doi":"10.1177/0971333620937512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With rising numbers of elderly and dementia in developing societies, there is a need to understand factors protective against dementia. Evidence suggests that lifetime cognitive activities including education, occupation, and complex leisure activities contribute to cognitive reserve. However, these factors are understudied in India. This paper describes the validation of the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ), a comprehensive measure of complex lifetime activities, to the Indian cultural context. It also examines the relationship between lifetime experiences and cognition among 52 healthy elderly and 30 dementia patients. High inter-rater (κ=0.923, p < 0.001), test-retest (ρ: 0.905 to 0.986) reliability, and internal consistency were found for LEQ-total (0.992) and sub-scores. Literate dementia patients (25) scored significantly lower mid-life (27.5 vs. 23.3), late-life (28.5 vs. 22.5) and total LEQ (83.5 vs. 20.9) scores than literate healthy group (37). LEQ scores positively correlated with global cognition, and domains of attention and memory on the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, in healthy and dementia groups. Moreover, LEQ scores correlated positively with age at onset of dementia and negatively with clinical dementia rating (CDR) scores. Our study demonstrates that lifetime activities, especially mid-life experiences, play a protective role in development of late-life dementia, and need to be advocated to preserve late-life cognition.","PeriodicalId":54177,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Developing Societies","volume":"32 1","pages":"308 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0971333620937512","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Developing Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333620937512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

With rising numbers of elderly and dementia in developing societies, there is a need to understand factors protective against dementia. Evidence suggests that lifetime cognitive activities including education, occupation, and complex leisure activities contribute to cognitive reserve. However, these factors are understudied in India. This paper describes the validation of the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ), a comprehensive measure of complex lifetime activities, to the Indian cultural context. It also examines the relationship between lifetime experiences and cognition among 52 healthy elderly and 30 dementia patients. High inter-rater (κ=0.923, p < 0.001), test-retest (ρ: 0.905 to 0.986) reliability, and internal consistency were found for LEQ-total (0.992) and sub-scores. Literate dementia patients (25) scored significantly lower mid-life (27.5 vs. 23.3), late-life (28.5 vs. 22.5) and total LEQ (83.5 vs. 20.9) scores than literate healthy group (37). LEQ scores positively correlated with global cognition, and domains of attention and memory on the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, in healthy and dementia groups. Moreover, LEQ scores correlated positively with age at onset of dementia and negatively with clinical dementia rating (CDR) scores. Our study demonstrates that lifetime activities, especially mid-life experiences, play a protective role in development of late-life dementia, and need to be advocated to preserve late-life cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度背景下跨寿命和认知老龄化的生活方式体验评估
随着发展中社会老年人和痴呆症人数的增加,有必要了解预防痴呆症的因素。有证据表明,包括教育、职业和复杂的休闲活动在内的终身认知活动有助于认知储备。然而,这些因素在印度没有得到充分研究。本文描述了一生经历问卷(LEQ)的验证,这是一个复杂的一生活动的综合衡量标准,以印度文化背景。研究还考察了52名健康老年人和30名痴呆患者的一生经历与认知之间的关系。leq总分(0.992)和分项得分的评分间信度(κ=0.923, p < 0.001)、重测信度(ρ: 0.905 ~ 0.986)和内部一致性较高。识字痴呆患者(25人)的中年(27.5比23.3)、晚年(28.5比22.5)和总LEQ(83.5比20.9)得分显著低于识字健康组(37人)。在阿登布鲁克认知测验中,LEQ得分与健康组和痴呆组的整体认知、注意力和记忆领域呈正相关。此外,LEQ得分与痴呆发病年龄呈正相关,与临床痴呆评分(CDR)得分呈负相关。我们的研究表明,一生的活动,特别是中年经历,在晚年痴呆的发展中起着保护作用,需要提倡保持晚年认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Developing Societies
Psychology and Developing Societies PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Get a better perspective on the role of psychology in the developing world in Psychology and Developing Societies. This unique journal features a common platform for debate by psychologists from various parts of the world; articles based on alternate paradigms, indigenous concepts, and relevant methods for social policies in developing societies; and the unique socio-cultural and historical experiences of developing countries compared to Euro-American societies.
期刊最新文献
Validating Cognitive and Emotional Urges in Comprehending One’s Surroundings: The Case of Attraction from Attitudes Exploring the Influence of Decisionmaking Style and Financial Status of Cancer Patients on Varied Cultural Aspects of Decision Process The Effects of Intermarriages Versus Intramarriages on Intergroup Relationships Among Kurdish Tribes IAPS in India: A Cross-cultural Validation Study of Highly Arousing Emotional Pictures Applying Self-Determination Theory to International Development and Humanitarian Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1