The Novelty of Ayahuasca Scale and the prediction of intentions to use

IF 2.2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Psychedelic Studies Pub Date : 2020-03-09 DOI:10.1556/2054.2020.00117
Brianna R. Altman, M. Mian, M. Earleywine
{"title":"The Novelty of Ayahuasca Scale and the prediction of intentions to use","authors":"Brianna R. Altman, M. Mian, M. Earleywine","doi":"10.1556/2054.2020.00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the growing popularity of ayahuasca and other hallucinogens, we sought to identify related expectancies and their role in why people might use this psychoactive brew rather than classic hallucinogens like LSD or psilocybin.Experienced users (N = 139) completed an online survey about their use of hallucinogens (including ayahuasca), how their ayahuasca experiences differed from those with other hallucinogens, as well as their intentions to use hallucinogens (including ayahuasca) in the future.Participants expected ayahuasca effects to differ meaningfully from the effects of other hallucinogens in multiple domains. Expected differences involved positive connections to nature (and other people), dramatic (or terrifying) thoughts, high variability of effects, and physical reactions. Intentions to use ayahuasca in the future increased as expectancies for positive connections increased, but decreased as physical reactions increased. One version of the full Novelty of Ayahuasca scale significantly covaried with the likelihood of using ayahuasca over other hallucinogens in the future, while another version did not. This result calls for further work examining how users perceive certain ayahuasca-induced effects.These findings reveal that expectancies for ayahuasca differ from those for other hallucinogens, and impact an individual's willingness to try the substance again. Understanding these differences might help those who are interested in the therapeutic potential of hallucinogens decide among those available. Future studies might examine how these expectancies predict intentions to use ayahuasca (and other hallucinogens) longitudinally. Comparable approaches could also identify unique expectancies for other hallucinogens to see if those predict a preference for one over others.","PeriodicalId":34732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/2054.2020.00117","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the growing popularity of ayahuasca and other hallucinogens, we sought to identify related expectancies and their role in why people might use this psychoactive brew rather than classic hallucinogens like LSD or psilocybin.Experienced users (N = 139) completed an online survey about their use of hallucinogens (including ayahuasca), how their ayahuasca experiences differed from those with other hallucinogens, as well as their intentions to use hallucinogens (including ayahuasca) in the future.Participants expected ayahuasca effects to differ meaningfully from the effects of other hallucinogens in multiple domains. Expected differences involved positive connections to nature (and other people), dramatic (or terrifying) thoughts, high variability of effects, and physical reactions. Intentions to use ayahuasca in the future increased as expectancies for positive connections increased, but decreased as physical reactions increased. One version of the full Novelty of Ayahuasca scale significantly covaried with the likelihood of using ayahuasca over other hallucinogens in the future, while another version did not. This result calls for further work examining how users perceive certain ayahuasca-induced effects.These findings reveal that expectancies for ayahuasca differ from those for other hallucinogens, and impact an individual's willingness to try the substance again. Understanding these differences might help those who are interested in the therapeutic potential of hallucinogens decide among those available. Future studies might examine how these expectancies predict intentions to use ayahuasca (and other hallucinogens) longitudinally. Comparable approaches could also identify unique expectancies for other hallucinogens to see if those predict a preference for one over others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ayawasca量表的新颖性及其使用意向预测
鉴于阿亚瓦斯卡和其他致幻剂越来越受欢迎,我们试图确定相关的预期及其在人们可能使用这种精神活性饮料而不是LSD或裸盖菇素等经典致幻剂中的作用。有经验的用户(N=139)完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及他们对致幻剂(包括阿亚瓦斯卡)的使用,他们的阿亚瓦斯卡体验与其他致幻剂的体验有何不同,以及他们未来使用致幻剂时的意图。参与者预计阿亚瓦斯卡的作用在多个领域与其他致幻剂的作用有意义的不同。预期的差异包括与自然(和其他人)的积极联系、戏剧性(或可怕)的想法、效果的高度可变性和身体反应。未来使用阿亚瓦斯卡的意愿随着阳性连接预期的增加而增加,但随着身体反应的增加而减少。阿亚瓦斯卡完整新颖性量表的一个版本与未来使用阿亚瓦斯卡比其他致幻剂的可能性显著一致,而另一个版本则没有。这一结果要求进一步研究用户如何感知某些阿亚瓦斯卡诱导的效果。这些发现表明,对阿亚瓦斯卡的预期与对其他致幻剂的预期不同,并影响个人再次尝试该物质的意愿。了解这些差异可能有助于那些对致幻剂的治疗潜力感兴趣的人在可用的致幻剂中做出选择。未来的研究可能会检验这些预期如何纵向预测使用阿亚瓦斯卡(和其他致幻剂)的意图。可比较的方法还可以确定对其他致幻剂的独特预期,看看这些致幻剂是否预测出对一种致幻剂比对其他致幻药的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychedelic Studies
Journal of Psychedelic Studies Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychedemia: Charting the future of interdisciplinary Psychedelic Studies MDMA-assisted therapy for borderline personality disorder Perceptions of psychedelic personality change, determinants of use, setting and drug moderation: Toward a holistic model Psychedelics and schizophrenia: A mystery in history Toad in the road: Biocultural history and conservation challenges of the Sonoran Desert Toad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1