Outcome analysis following posterior instrumentation, decompression, and intertransverse fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

P. Madhuchandra, G. Santhosh, K. Raju
{"title":"Outcome analysis following posterior instrumentation, decompression, and intertransverse fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","authors":"P. Madhuchandra, G. Santhosh, K. Raju","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_89_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Degenerative spondylolisthesis is one of the most common causes for low back ache and radiculopathy and causes disability. Various surgical procedures have been described to achieve fusion. Intertransverse fusion (ITF) is the simplest of all with very less rates of complications. Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws, decompression, and ITF in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis based on the clinical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire and also to assess the fusion rates. Materials and Methods: A single-grouped, prospective interventional study was conducted from June 2015 to June 2019 in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 44 patients with Grades I and II degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of the Meyerding radiological grading system were included in the study. Posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws, decompression, and ITF was performed in all these patients. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using ODI-based questionnaire. Results: The mean preoperative Oswestry score was 58.33 ± 10.66 and the mean postoperative score was 24.26 ± 12.80 at 1-year follow-up. Fifty percent had excellent and another 50% had better results with overall 100% satisfactory results, with a mean preoperative and postoperative difference of 34.07 ± 18.00 for ODI. All patients achieved radiological fusion. Conclusion: The study observed that ITF for Grades I and II degenerative lumbar spondylolistheses is a safe and simple fusion procedure with lesser rates of complications and higher rates of radiological fusion.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"149 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_89_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Degenerative spondylolisthesis is one of the most common causes for low back ache and radiculopathy and causes disability. Various surgical procedures have been described to achieve fusion. Intertransverse fusion (ITF) is the simplest of all with very less rates of complications. Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws, decompression, and ITF in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis based on the clinical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire and also to assess the fusion rates. Materials and Methods: A single-grouped, prospective interventional study was conducted from June 2015 to June 2019 in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 44 patients with Grades I and II degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of the Meyerding radiological grading system were included in the study. Posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws, decompression, and ITF was performed in all these patients. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using ODI-based questionnaire. Results: The mean preoperative Oswestry score was 58.33 ± 10.66 and the mean postoperative score was 24.26 ± 12.80 at 1-year follow-up. Fifty percent had excellent and another 50% had better results with overall 100% satisfactory results, with a mean preoperative and postoperative difference of 34.07 ± 18.00 for ODI. All patients achieved radiological fusion. Conclusion: The study observed that ITF for Grades I and II degenerative lumbar spondylolistheses is a safe and simple fusion procedure with lesser rates of complications and higher rates of radiological fusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退行性腰椎滑脱后路内固定、减压和横间融合术后的结果分析
背景:退行性脊柱滑脱是腰背痛和神经根病最常见的原因之一,并导致残疾。实现融合的手术方法多种多样。横间融合术(ITF)是所有融合术中最简单的,并发症发生率极低。目的:本研究的目的是根据Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)问卷的临床结果分析椎弓根螺钉后路内固定、减压和ITF治疗退行性腰椎滑脱的结果,并评估融合率。材料与方法:2015年6月至2019年6月,在一家三级医院进行了一项单组前瞻性介入研究。根据Meyerding放射分级系统,共纳入44例I级和II级退行性腰椎滑脱患者。所有患者均行椎弓根螺钉后路内固定、减压和ITF。术前和术后采用odi问卷对患者进行评估。结果:1年随访时,术前Oswestry评分平均值为58.33±10.66,术后评分平均值为24.26±12.80。50%为优秀,另外50%为较好,总体100%满意,ODI的平均术前和术后差异为34.07±18.00。所有患者均达到放射融合。结论:本研究观察到ITF治疗I级和II级退行性腰椎滑脱是一种安全、简单的融合手术,并发症发生率低,放射融合率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Conservative Treatment of Upper Limb Diaphyseal and Metaphyseal Fractures (Humerus, Radius, and Ulna) with Extension Casting Outcome of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Complex Fractures Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using calcium phosphate cement for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A prospective study of functional outcomes A prospective and retrospective study of the outcome of high tibial osteotomy in osteoarthritis of the knee with varus deformity Randomized clinical trial to assess functional outcome and complication of surgical neck humerus fracture (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and Philos plating
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1