Nest Volume and Distance between Nests Do Not Affect Population Size or Species Richness of the Termitophilous Corotocini Fauna

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 ECOLOGY Annales Zoologici Fennici Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.5735/086.059.0107
C. M. Pires-Silva, Igor Eloi, B. Zilberman, M. A. Bezerra-Gusmão
{"title":"Nest Volume and Distance between Nests Do Not Affect Population Size or Species Richness of the Termitophilous Corotocini Fauna","authors":"C. M. Pires-Silva, Igor Eloi, B. Zilberman, M. A. Bezerra-Gusmão","doi":"10.5735/086.059.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Termite nests act as shelters for a wide variety of invertebrates. We studied the Corotocini termitophile fauna (Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) in nine Nasutitermes corniger nests and nine N. ephratae nests to test the resource size (larger nests should host more social-parasite species than smaller ones) and resource concentration (nests occurring closer to each other should host a greater richness and variety of social parasites) hypotheses. In total, we found 358 Corotocini individuals. Regression analysis did not reveal a relationship between species richness or population size of termitophiles and nest volume. Thus, we rejected the resource size hypotheses as a driver of termitophile diversity. Neither did distance between nests explain the richness of their fauna; thus, the resource concentration hypothesis was also rejected. In conclusion, we suggest that biological aspects, such as dispersal dynamics and species traits likely explain the diversity of termitophiles.","PeriodicalId":50968,"journal":{"name":"Annales Zoologici Fennici","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Zoologici Fennici","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5735/086.059.0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Termite nests act as shelters for a wide variety of invertebrates. We studied the Corotocini termitophile fauna (Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) in nine Nasutitermes corniger nests and nine N. ephratae nests to test the resource size (larger nests should host more social-parasite species than smaller ones) and resource concentration (nests occurring closer to each other should host a greater richness and variety of social parasites) hypotheses. In total, we found 358 Corotocini individuals. Regression analysis did not reveal a relationship between species richness or population size of termitophiles and nest volume. Thus, we rejected the resource size hypotheses as a driver of termitophile diversity. Neither did distance between nests explain the richness of their fauna; thus, the resource concentration hypothesis was also rejected. In conclusion, we suggest that biological aspects, such as dispersal dynamics and species traits likely explain the diversity of termitophiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巢体积和巢间距离不影响嗜白蚁类的种群规模和物种丰富度
白蚁巢是各种无脊椎动物的庇护所。我们研究了9个纳苏特白蚁巢和9个埃弗氏猪笼草巢中的亲共杀性白蚁动物群(Staphylinidae,Aleocharinae),以测试资源规模(较大的巢应该比较小的巢容纳更多的社会寄生虫物种)和资源集中度(彼此更近的巢应该容纳更丰富和多样的社会寄生虫)假设。我们总共发现了358个催产素个体。回归分析并未揭示亲白蚁的物种丰富度或种群规模与巢穴体积之间的关系。因此,我们拒绝将资源规模假设作为亲白蚁多样性的驱动因素。巢穴之间的距离也不能解释它们动物群的丰富性;因此,资源集中假说也被否定了。总之,我们认为生物学方面,如传播动力学和物种特征,可能解释了亲白蚁的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Zoologici Fennici
Annales Zoologici Fennici 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annales Zoologici Fennici publishes mainly original research reports, but also in-depth reviews and commentaries on all aspects of animal ecology and evolution, and fields related to them. Our aim is to promote papers which focus on the interactions among various components in the past and present environments by using integrative and cross-disciplinary approaches. This may be achieved by employing tools from different fields of research, such as (but not restricted to): ecology and paleoecology, molecular ecology and phylogeography, conservation biology, human-induced contemporary evolution and wildlife management, animal behaviour and interactions (including recognition systems and mechanisms), paleontology (except systematics and taxonomy) and evolution, bioenergetics.
期刊最新文献
Immature stages of Smicridea (Smicridea) erecta Flint, 1974 (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae) Redescription of Buresilia macrina (Roewer, 1956) (Opiliones, Phalangiidae) from Turkey with the First Description of the Female The Beautiful Brocade, Lacanobia contigua, Females Select Tops of Senescent Elymus nutans Plants for Egg Laying Cnaphoscapus sternofovelus (Curculionidae, Entiminae), a New Species from Arunachal Pradesh, India Taxonomy of the Palaearctic species of Anaphes Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), with Special Focus on Their Identity and Diversity in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1