Respiratory Muscle Strength in Brazilian Adolescents: Impact of Body Composition

Obesities Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.3390/obesities3020013
Viviane Campos de Lima, M. Marquezi, Paulo Roberto Alcantara, Nayara Barbosa Lopes, C. S. Frientes, Thais Miriã da Silva Santos, Leonardo Ribeiro Miedes, Matheus Silva Fornel, Danielle Castro Oliveira, P. Rogeri, A. L. Lancha Junior, Nathalia Bernardes, J. M. Lino Aparecido
{"title":"Respiratory Muscle Strength in Brazilian Adolescents: Impact of Body Composition","authors":"Viviane Campos de Lima, M. Marquezi, Paulo Roberto Alcantara, Nayara Barbosa Lopes, C. S. Frientes, Thais Miriã da Silva Santos, Leonardo Ribeiro Miedes, Matheus Silva Fornel, Danielle Castro Oliveira, P. Rogeri, A. L. Lancha Junior, Nathalia Bernardes, J. M. Lino Aparecido","doi":"10.3390/obesities3020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) Introduction: Studies on respiratory muscle strength (RMS) in adolescents are controversial. Few studies so far have investigated respiratory muscle strength in Brazilian adolescents and the impact of body composition on it. (2) Objective: to evaluate the respiratory muscle strength of Brazilian adolescents and compare this with nationally and internationally predicted normality values. (3) Method: A cross-sectional study (CAEE: 34634414.5.0000.5479) was carried out with 98 adolescents, where both sexes were divided into four groups: eutrophic (n = 44); overweight (n = 15), obese (n = 25), and severely obese (n = 14). All were submitted to an anthropometric assessment, body composition analysis and manovacuometry. To interpret the results, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s post hoc test was used. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Friedman’s post hoc test were used to compare the observed vs. proposed results. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (4) Results: There were no differences among the groups for maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures. However, when considering the total sample, we could say that RMS was higher among boys, and there were no significant differences in RMS in relation to the maturational stage. The values obtained for MIP were lower than those suggested for the national equation and higher than those proposed for the international equation. Similarly, the values obtained for MEP were lower than those suggested for the national and international equation. (5) Conclusions: RMS was similar in adolescents with different body compositions and different maturation stages. Adiposity did not interfere with RMS in adolescents. Boys had higher MIP and MEP values compared to girls. Therefore, the reference values proposed by the equations do not consistently match RMS in the adolescents studied. This context reinforces the need for new studies that are related to RMS to establish normality values and propose equations that represent the youth population.","PeriodicalId":93598,"journal":{"name":"Obesities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities3020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Studies on respiratory muscle strength (RMS) in adolescents are controversial. Few studies so far have investigated respiratory muscle strength in Brazilian adolescents and the impact of body composition on it. (2) Objective: to evaluate the respiratory muscle strength of Brazilian adolescents and compare this with nationally and internationally predicted normality values. (3) Method: A cross-sectional study (CAEE: 34634414.5.0000.5479) was carried out with 98 adolescents, where both sexes were divided into four groups: eutrophic (n = 44); overweight (n = 15), obese (n = 25), and severely obese (n = 14). All were submitted to an anthropometric assessment, body composition analysis and manovacuometry. To interpret the results, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s post hoc test was used. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Friedman’s post hoc test were used to compare the observed vs. proposed results. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (4) Results: There were no differences among the groups for maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures. However, when considering the total sample, we could say that RMS was higher among boys, and there were no significant differences in RMS in relation to the maturational stage. The values obtained for MIP were lower than those suggested for the national equation and higher than those proposed for the international equation. Similarly, the values obtained for MEP were lower than those suggested for the national and international equation. (5) Conclusions: RMS was similar in adolescents with different body compositions and different maturation stages. Adiposity did not interfere with RMS in adolescents. Boys had higher MIP and MEP values compared to girls. Therefore, the reference values proposed by the equations do not consistently match RMS in the adolescents studied. This context reinforces the need for new studies that are related to RMS to establish normality values and propose equations that represent the youth population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西青少年呼吸肌力量:身体成分的影响
(1)引言:青少年呼吸肌力量(RMS)的研究存在争议。迄今为止,很少有研究调查巴西青少年的呼吸肌力量以及身体成分对其的影响。(2)目的:评价巴西青少年的呼吸肌力量,并与国内外预测正常值进行比较。(3)方法:采用横断面研究(CAEE: 34634414.5.000 .5479)对98名青少年进行研究,将其男女分为富营养化组(n = 44);超重(n = 15),肥胖(n = 25),严重肥胖(n = 14)。所有患者均接受人体测量学评估、身体成分分析和压力测量。为了解释结果,方差分析(ANOVA)与土耳其的事后检验被使用。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Friedman事后检验比较观察结果和建议结果。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。(4)结果:两组患者最大吸气压(MIP)和最大呼气压(MEP)差异无统计学意义。然而,当考虑到总样本时,我们可以说RMS在男孩中更高,并且RMS在成熟阶段没有显着差异。获得的MIP值低于国家方程的建议值,高于国际方程的建议值。同样,MEP得到的值低于国内和国际方程的建议值。(5)结论:不同身体成分、不同成熟阶段的青少年RMS相似。肥胖不影响青少年的RMS。男孩的MIP和MEP值高于女孩。因此,方程提出的参考值与所研究的青少年的RMS并不一致。这种背景加强了对与均方根相关的新研究的需求,以建立正态性值并提出代表青年人口的方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Implementations of an Obesity Prevention Culinary Nutrition Education Program for Family Care Providers. Silymarin: A Natural Compound for Obesity Management Childhood and Adolescent Obesity in a School in Interior Portugal—A Teen without Risk Study Effectiveness of an Email-Based, Semaglutide-Supported Weight-Loss Service for People with Overweight and Obesity in Germany: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Analysis The Metabolic Syndrome: An Overview and Proposed Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1