Staff and student perspectives of online teaching and learning; implications for belonging and engagement at university – a qualitative exploration

Lija Abu, Craig Chipfuwamiti, A. Costea, A. Kelly, Krisztina Major, H. Mulrooney
{"title":"Staff and student perspectives of online teaching and learning; implications for belonging and engagement at university – a qualitative exploration","authors":"Lija Abu, Craig Chipfuwamiti, A. Costea, A. Kelly, Krisztina Major, H. Mulrooney","doi":"10.21100/compass.v14i3.1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sense of belonging within higher education (HE) enhances educational engagement and attainment. The rapid shift to online provision has implications for reducing students’ sense of belonging at university. We have previously shown that students consider belonging in HE to be important and that their personal sense of belonging was high. We also found that sense of belonging had elements of people and place: relationships with peers and staff were influential and the physical campus facilitated social relationships. In the first lockdown, we showed that sense of belonging in both staff and students at our large widening-participation London university was reduced. In this paper, we report on a continuing project to explore the impact of sustained provision of learning online, focusing on qualitative interviews carried out with forty-three students and twenty-three staff. Both groups identified advantages and disadvantages of online provision. Advantages included flexibility and accessibility, with savings – financial and time – owing to reduced commuting. However, both groups identified a negative impact on social relationships, student motivation and engagement. Future development of blended learning should be planned, supported and structured to optimise the benefits.","PeriodicalId":31649,"journal":{"name":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v14i3.1219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A sense of belonging within higher education (HE) enhances educational engagement and attainment. The rapid shift to online provision has implications for reducing students’ sense of belonging at university. We have previously shown that students consider belonging in HE to be important and that their personal sense of belonging was high. We also found that sense of belonging had elements of people and place: relationships with peers and staff were influential and the physical campus facilitated social relationships. In the first lockdown, we showed that sense of belonging in both staff and students at our large widening-participation London university was reduced. In this paper, we report on a continuing project to explore the impact of sustained provision of learning online, focusing on qualitative interviews carried out with forty-three students and twenty-three staff. Both groups identified advantages and disadvantages of online provision. Advantages included flexibility and accessibility, with savings – financial and time – owing to reduced commuting. However, both groups identified a negative impact on social relationships, student motivation and engagement. Future development of blended learning should be planned, supported and structured to optimise the benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工和学生对在线教学的看法;大学归属感和参与度的含义——一项质的探索
高等教育(HE)的归属感提高了教育的参与度和成就。向网络教学的快速转变可能会降低学生对大学的归属感。我们之前的研究表明,学生认为高等教育中的归属感很重要,他们的个人归属感很高。我们还发现归属感有人和地方的因素:与同伴和员工的关系是有影响力的,而有形的校园促进了社会关系。在第一次封锁期间,我们发现,在我们大规模扩大参与的伦敦大学,教职员工和学生的归属感都有所减少。在本文中,我们报告了一个持续的项目,以探索持续提供在线学习的影响,重点是对43名学生和23名员工进行定性访谈。两组人都确定了在线供应的优点和缺点。优点包括灵活性和可达性,由于减少了通勤,节省了资金和时间。然而,两组人都发现了对社会关系、学生动机和参与度的负面影响。混合式学习的未来发展应该得到规划、支持和结构化,以优化其效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Regulating the Privately Rented Sector: what can universities offer to support local authority workforce development? Open Scholarship and Decolonisation in Higher Education Exploring humour within the PhD experience: a first-hand reflection The Midterm Wrapper: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of an Effective Performance Intervention (Re)defining learning design: a framework fit for the twenty-first century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1