L2 collocation profiles and their relationship with vocabulary proficiency: A learner corpus approach

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100975
Masaki Eguchi , Kristopher Kyle
{"title":"L2 collocation profiles and their relationship with vocabulary proficiency: A learner corpus approach","authors":"Masaki Eguchi ,&nbsp;Kristopher Kyle","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The current study extends extant research on lexical collocation and L2 English proficiency by analyzing how L2 argumentative writings assessed at different proficiency levels differ in their compositions of weakly and strongly associated collocations. Using a Natural Language Processing pipeline, a total of 640 essays from the ICNALE corpus (Ishikawa, 2018) were analyzed for word pairs that are syntactically related (e.g., Verb-Direct object), and the relationships between the relative proportions of collocations with varying strengths of association (SOA) and vocabulary proficiency scores were examined. A series of </span>regression analyses revealed that collocations from various MI score bins showed distinct patterns of use across proficiency levels, indicating, for example, increases in the use of strongly associated collocations and decreases in the use of repelled collocations. The finding also indicated that band-based MI measures demonstrated better predictive validity than mean MI scores in modeling the vocabulary proficiency score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323000139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current study extends extant research on lexical collocation and L2 English proficiency by analyzing how L2 argumentative writings assessed at different proficiency levels differ in their compositions of weakly and strongly associated collocations. Using a Natural Language Processing pipeline, a total of 640 essays from the ICNALE corpus (Ishikawa, 2018) were analyzed for word pairs that are syntactically related (e.g., Verb-Direct object), and the relationships between the relative proportions of collocations with varying strengths of association (SOA) and vocabulary proficiency scores were examined. A series of regression analyses revealed that collocations from various MI score bins showed distinct patterns of use across proficiency levels, indicating, for example, increases in the use of strongly associated collocations and decreases in the use of repelled collocations. The finding also indicated that band-based MI measures demonstrated better predictive validity than mean MI scores in modeling the vocabulary proficiency score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二语搭配特征及其与词汇熟练度的关系:学习者语料库方法
本研究扩展了词汇搭配与二语英语水平的现有研究,分析了在不同水平下评估的二语议论文在弱关联搭配和强关联搭配的构成上的差异。使用自然语言处理管道,对来自ICNALE语料库(Ishikawa, 2018)的640篇文章进行了句法相关(例如,动词-直接对象)的分析,并检查了不同关联强度(SOA)搭配的相对比例与词汇熟练度分数之间的关系。一系列的回归分析显示,来自不同MI得分箱的搭配在不同熟练程度上显示出不同的使用模式,例如,表明使用强相关搭配的增加和使用排斥搭配的减少。研究结果还表明,基于频带的MI测量在模拟词汇熟练程度得分方面比平均MI得分具有更好的预测效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1