A comparison of match demands using ball-in-play vs. whole match data in elite male youth soccer players

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Science and Medicine in Football Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/24733938.2019.1682183
Josh Wass, Dylan Mernagh, Ben Pollard, Perry F. Stewart, Wesley Fox, Nimai Parmar, B. Jones, L. Kilduff, A. Turner
{"title":"A comparison of match demands using ball-in-play vs. whole match data in elite male youth soccer players","authors":"Josh Wass, Dylan Mernagh, Ben Pollard, Perry F. Stewart, Wesley Fox, Nimai Parmar, B. Jones, L. Kilduff, A. Turner","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2019.1682183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Instruction: Effective playing time in soccer is typically < 60 min per game and while players may reposition themselves when the ball is out of play, it is likely the physical demand decreases during this period. Therefore, if this period is included in data when quantifying match demands, it may under-report the physical requirements of soccer players. This study investigated an alternative method for quantifying external workload called ball in play (BiP), which analyses the data excluding stoppages, and thus potentially offers a more insightful analysis of match demands.Methods: Whole match demands as typically recorded via GPS, were compared to those based on BiP, and maximum BiP, with the latter representing worst case scenario phases of play. The 25-elite male youth soccer players (age: 17.9 ± 0.6 years; height: 174.8 ± 6.2 cm; body mass: 66.3 ± 8.1 kg) who participated in this study were also categorised in to positional groups (defender, midfielder, and forward) to assess differences in positional demands.Results: While no differences were noted based on position, whole match metrics were significantly lower than mean and maximum BiP metrics (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference for maximum BiP outputs across different in-play durations, when comparing 30-60 seconds, 60–90 seconds, and > 90 seconds.Conclusion: This data allows practitioners to gain a deeper understanding of the physical demands imposed on players and plan sessions using targets that better represent match demands.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2019.1682183","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1682183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

ABSTRACT Instruction: Effective playing time in soccer is typically < 60 min per game and while players may reposition themselves when the ball is out of play, it is likely the physical demand decreases during this period. Therefore, if this period is included in data when quantifying match demands, it may under-report the physical requirements of soccer players. This study investigated an alternative method for quantifying external workload called ball in play (BiP), which analyses the data excluding stoppages, and thus potentially offers a more insightful analysis of match demands.Methods: Whole match demands as typically recorded via GPS, were compared to those based on BiP, and maximum BiP, with the latter representing worst case scenario phases of play. The 25-elite male youth soccer players (age: 17.9 ± 0.6 years; height: 174.8 ± 6.2 cm; body mass: 66.3 ± 8.1 kg) who participated in this study were also categorised in to positional groups (defender, midfielder, and forward) to assess differences in positional demands.Results: While no differences were noted based on position, whole match metrics were significantly lower than mean and maximum BiP metrics (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference for maximum BiP outputs across different in-play durations, when comparing 30-60 seconds, 60–90 seconds, and > 90 seconds.Conclusion: This data allows practitioners to gain a deeper understanding of the physical demands imposed on players and plan sessions using targets that better represent match demands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优秀青年男子足球运动员在比赛中使用球与整场比赛数据的比赛需求比较
摘要:足球比赛的有效比赛时间通常小于60分钟,当球出球时,球员可能会重新定位,在此期间,身体需求可能会减少。因此,如果在量化比赛需求时将这段时间纳入数据,可能会低估足球运动员的身体需求。本研究研究了一种量化外部工作量的替代方法,称为比赛中球(BiP),该方法分析了不包括暂停的数据,从而可能提供更有洞察力的比赛需求分析。方法:通常通过GPS记录的整个比赛需求,与基于BiP和最大BiP的需求进行比较,后者代表游戏的最坏情况阶段。25名优秀青年男子足球运动员(年龄:17.9±0.6岁;高度:174.8±6.2 cm;体重:66.3±8.1 kg)的参与者也被分为位置组(后卫、中场和前锋),以评估位置需求的差异。结果:虽然体位差异无统计学意义,但整体匹配指标显著低于平均和最大BiP指标(p < 0.05)。在30-60秒、60-90秒和> - 90秒之间,在不同的游戏持续时间内,最大BiP输出也存在显著差异。结论:这些数据使从业者能够更深入地了解球员的身体需求,并使用更好地代表比赛需求的目标来计划训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Measures of (injury and illness) occurrence: a primer on epidemiological concepts and terminology for authors. The maturity status but not the relative age influences elite young football players’ physical performance Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players Author reply to Weaving et al.: comment on: ‘A contemporary multi-modal mechanical approach to training monitoring in elite professional soccer: a mathematical problem?’ The influence of relative playing area and player numerical imbalance on physical and perceptual demands in soccer small-sided game formats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1