The Reliability and Stability of Measures of Individuals' Values and Beliefs Concerning Developmental Idealism in Nepal

IF 1.3 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Sociology of Development Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1525/sod.2019.5.3.314
A. Thornton, Dirgha J Ghimire, L. Young-DeMarco, Prem Bhandari
{"title":"The Reliability and Stability of Measures of Individuals' Values and Beliefs Concerning Developmental Idealism in Nepal","authors":"A. Thornton, Dirgha J Ghimire, L. Young-DeMarco, Prem Bhandari","doi":"10.1525/sod.2019.5.3.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the reliability and stability of developmental idealism (DI) measures in Nepal. DI is a set of cultural schemas that contains beliefs and values favoring modern societies and families over traditional ones and that views modern families as causes and effects of modern societies. It also views the world as dynamic, with change from traditionality toward modernity. Earlier studies have shown that DI has been disseminated widely internationally, but provide little evidence concerning whether individual views of DI can be reliably measured or the extent to which such views are stable across time. We estimate the reliability and stability of DI measures using panel data collected in Nepal. Our results indicate substantial reliability, equal or nearly equal to the reliability of standard value and belief items measured in general American surveys. There is also considerable stability of DI views across our study interval from 2008 to 2011.","PeriodicalId":36869,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/sod.2019.5.3.314","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2019.5.3.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines the reliability and stability of developmental idealism (DI) measures in Nepal. DI is a set of cultural schemas that contains beliefs and values favoring modern societies and families over traditional ones and that views modern families as causes and effects of modern societies. It also views the world as dynamic, with change from traditionality toward modernity. Earlier studies have shown that DI has been disseminated widely internationally, but provide little evidence concerning whether individual views of DI can be reliably measured or the extent to which such views are stable across time. We estimate the reliability and stability of DI measures using panel data collected in Nepal. Our results indicate substantial reliability, equal or nearly equal to the reliability of standard value and belief items measured in general American surveys. There is also considerable stability of DI views across our study interval from 2008 to 2011.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔发展理想主义的个人价值观和信念测量的可靠性和稳定性
本文考察了尼泊尔发展理想主义(DI)措施的可靠性和稳定性。DI是一套文化模式,其中包含有利于现代社会和家庭而不是传统社会和家庭的信仰和价值观,并将现代家庭视为现代社会的因果关系。它还认为世界是动态的,从传统到现代的变化。早期的研究表明,DI在国际上广泛传播,但几乎没有证据表明个人对DI的看法是否可以可靠地衡量,或者这些观点在多大程度上是稳定的。我们使用在尼泊尔收集的面板数据估计DI措施的可靠性和稳定性。我们的结果显示了相当的信度,等于或接近等于一般美国调查中测量的标准值和信念项目的信度。从2008年到2011年,在我们的研究区间内,DI视图也有相当大的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology of Development
Sociology of Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Militarization, Risk, and the Environment Layered Logic From Booms to Bans The Complex Reality of National Park Development under Authoritarianism Hydropower Plant Construction and Resettlement in Nghệ An, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1