EXPRESS: Horizontal Referrals in B2B Markets

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Research Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1177/00222437231175415
Mahima Hada, Arnaud De Bruyn, G. Lilien
{"title":"EXPRESS: Horizontal Referrals in B2B Markets","authors":"Mahima Hada, Arnaud De Bruyn, G. Lilien","doi":"10.1177/00222437231175415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Horizontal referrals –when suppliers recommend other suppliers– are a common phenomenon in complex B2B markets. For the referring supplier, giving the best-possible horizontal referral may strengthen the relationship with its customer, yet it may also threaten the referring supplier’s future revenues and cross-selling opportunities. Instead, the supplier could make an obligatory referral, one that fulfills the obligations of recommending another supplier while keeping referring supplier’s own interests paramount. We rely on role theory and its antecedents (mutual trust and referring supplier’s dependence) to determine when a referring supplier adopts the role of a friend (vs. a businessperson) and gives the best-possible referral (vs. an obligatory referral). Study 1, an experiment, supports our theoretical model. Study 2, a conjoint study, links the observable antecedents of the referring supplier-customer relationship to their choice of horizontal referrals. Study 3, another experiment, looks at the consequences of the horizontal referral on the referring supplier-customer relationship and shows that providing an obligatory referral can hurt the customer’s intent to continue their relationship with their supplier. This effect is mediated by the customer’s perceived alignment of interest with their supplier. For B2B marketing research and practice, we report that the supplier’s dependence is critical to predicting the quality of horizontal referrals, even though an exploratory survey showed that customers overlook that dimension and focus on mutual trust when seeking referrals.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231175415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Horizontal referrals –when suppliers recommend other suppliers– are a common phenomenon in complex B2B markets. For the referring supplier, giving the best-possible horizontal referral may strengthen the relationship with its customer, yet it may also threaten the referring supplier’s future revenues and cross-selling opportunities. Instead, the supplier could make an obligatory referral, one that fulfills the obligations of recommending another supplier while keeping referring supplier’s own interests paramount. We rely on role theory and its antecedents (mutual trust and referring supplier’s dependence) to determine when a referring supplier adopts the role of a friend (vs. a businessperson) and gives the best-possible referral (vs. an obligatory referral). Study 1, an experiment, supports our theoretical model. Study 2, a conjoint study, links the observable antecedents of the referring supplier-customer relationship to their choice of horizontal referrals. Study 3, another experiment, looks at the consequences of the horizontal referral on the referring supplier-customer relationship and shows that providing an obligatory referral can hurt the customer’s intent to continue their relationship with their supplier. This effect is mediated by the customer’s perceived alignment of interest with their supplier. For B2B marketing research and practice, we report that the supplier’s dependence is critical to predicting the quality of horizontal referrals, even though an exploratory survey showed that customers overlook that dimension and focus on mutual trust when seeking referrals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: B2B市场的横向推荐
横向推荐——当供应商推荐其他供应商时——在复杂的B2B市场中是一种常见现象。对于推荐供应商来说,提供尽可能好的横向推荐可能会加强与客户的关系,但也可能威胁到推荐供应商的未来收入和交叉销售机会。相反,供应商可以进行强制性推荐,即履行推荐另一家供应商的义务,同时将推荐供应商自身的利益放在首位。我们依靠角色理论及其前因(相互信任和推荐供应商的依赖性)来确定推荐供应商何时扮演朋友的角色(相对于商人)并提供尽可能好的推荐(相对于强制性推荐)。研究1是一项实验,支持了我们的理论模型。研究2是一项联合研究,将推荐供应商-客户关系的可观察的前因与他们选择的横向推荐联系起来。研究3是另一项实验,研究了横向推荐对推荐供应商-客户关系的影响,并表明提供强制性推荐会损害客户继续与供应商关系的意图。这种影响是由客户感知到的与其供应商的利益一致性来调节的。对于B2B营销研究和实践,我们报告称,供应商的依赖性对于预测横向推荐的质量至关重要,尽管一项探索性调查显示,客户在寻求推荐时忽略了这一维度,并关注相互信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories EXPRESS: Monitoring Technologies in Industrial Systems EXPRESS: How Listening versus Reading Alters Consumers’ Interpretations of News EXPRESS: The Closing-the-Gap Effect: Joint Evaluation Leads Donors to Help Charities Farther from Their Goal EXPRESS: Zooming in on the Very Early Days: The Role of Trademark Applications in the Acquisition of Venture Capital Seed Funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1