Time On with Baby and Time Off from Work

4区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences Future of Children Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1353/foc.2020.a807760
Maya Rossin-Slater, Jenna Stearns
{"title":"Time On with Baby and Time Off from Work","authors":"Maya Rossin-Slater, Jenna Stearns","doi":"10.1353/foc.2020.a807760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary:Compared to unpaid leave, paid family leave may better help working parents balance the competing needs of job and family early in a child’s life, among other advantages. Yet the United States remains one of only two countries in the world without a statutory national paid maternity leave policy, and one of the only high-income countries that doesn’t provide access to paid paternity leave for new fathers at the federal level.In theory, Maya Rossin-Slater and Jenna Stearns write, paid leave can benefit families in two ways: by changing the amount of income available in the household (and the amount of resources available for the child), and by increasing the amount of time parents spend with their children. Despite the lack of paid leave at the federal level, several US states have their own paid family leave programs, all of which provide partial wage replacement during leave to care for a newborn or newly adopted child, and aim to cover a broad segment of the workforce through minimal eligibility requirements. Rossin-Slater and Stearns review research about the effects of these state-level programs, as well as paid leave programs in other countries.The authors find that paid family leave has a number of benefits. For one, compared to unpaid leave, paid family leave increases leave-taking rates and leave duration, especially among disadvantaged parents. Paid leave programs that range from a few months to up to a year in length also appear to improve both infants’ health and mothers’ outcomes in the job market. At the same time, the research finds that existing paid leave programs have minimal impacts on businesses, suggesting that these programs confer benefits to workers and their families at little to no cost to their employers.Finally, because rising economic inequality in the United States is in part driven by disparities in early childhood, the authors argue that paid family leave may be one way to level the playing field for children from all backgrounds and help improve intergenerational mobility.","PeriodicalId":51448,"journal":{"name":"Future of Children","volume":"30 1","pages":"35 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Children","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2020.a807760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Summary:Compared to unpaid leave, paid family leave may better help working parents balance the competing needs of job and family early in a child’s life, among other advantages. Yet the United States remains one of only two countries in the world without a statutory national paid maternity leave policy, and one of the only high-income countries that doesn’t provide access to paid paternity leave for new fathers at the federal level.In theory, Maya Rossin-Slater and Jenna Stearns write, paid leave can benefit families in two ways: by changing the amount of income available in the household (and the amount of resources available for the child), and by increasing the amount of time parents spend with their children. Despite the lack of paid leave at the federal level, several US states have their own paid family leave programs, all of which provide partial wage replacement during leave to care for a newborn or newly adopted child, and aim to cover a broad segment of the workforce through minimal eligibility requirements. Rossin-Slater and Stearns review research about the effects of these state-level programs, as well as paid leave programs in other countries.The authors find that paid family leave has a number of benefits. For one, compared to unpaid leave, paid family leave increases leave-taking rates and leave duration, especially among disadvantaged parents. Paid leave programs that range from a few months to up to a year in length also appear to improve both infants’ health and mothers’ outcomes in the job market. At the same time, the research finds that existing paid leave programs have minimal impacts on businesses, suggesting that these programs confer benefits to workers and their families at little to no cost to their employers.Finally, because rising economic inequality in the United States is in part driven by disparities in early childhood, the authors argue that paid family leave may be one way to level the playing field for children from all backgrounds and help improve intergenerational mobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带孩子的时间和下班的时间
总结:与无薪假期相比,带薪家庭假可能更好地帮助在职父母在孩子生命早期平衡工作和家庭的竞争需求,以及其他优势。然而,美国仍然是世界上仅有的两个没有法定国家带薪产假政策的国家之一,也是仅有的几个没有在联邦层面为新父亲提供带薪陪产假的高收入国家之一。Maya Rossin Slater和Jenna Stearns写道,理论上,带薪休假可以通过两种方式使家庭受益:改变家庭的可用收入(以及孩子的可用资源),以及增加父母与孩子相处的时间。尽管联邦层面缺乏带薪休假,但美国几个州都有自己的带薪家庭假计划,所有这些计划都在照顾新生儿或新收养儿童的假期中提供部分工资替代,并旨在通过最低资格要求覆盖广大劳动力。Rossin Slater和Stearns回顾了关于这些州级计划以及其他国家带薪休假计划影响的研究。作者发现,带薪家庭假有许多好处。首先,与无薪休假相比,带薪家庭假增加了休假率和休假时间,尤其是在处境不利的父母中。带薪休假计划从几个月到一年不等,似乎也能改善婴儿的健康和母亲在就业市场上的表现。与此同时,研究发现,现有的带薪休假计划对企业的影响很小,这表明这些计划向工人及其家人提供福利,而雇主几乎没有成本。最后,由于美国日益加剧的经济不平等在一定程度上是由幼儿时期的差异驱动的,作者认为,带薪家庭假可能是为各种背景的儿童创造公平竞争环境的一种方式,有助于改善代际流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future of Children
Future of Children Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Future of Children is a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution. The mission of The Future of Children is to translate the best social science research about children and youth into information that is useful to policymakers, practitioners, grant-makers, advocates, the media, and students of public policy. The project publishes two journals and policy briefs each year, and provides various short summaries of our work. Topics range widely -- from income policy to family issues to education and health – with children’s policy as the unifying element. The senior editorial team is diverse, representing two institutions and multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the Issue Introducing the Issue Scaling Early Childhood Evidence-Based Interventions through RPPs Building Capacity for Research and Practice: A Partnership Approach A Unique Opportunity for Education Policy Makers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1