{"title":"Unbinding Gentility: Women Making Music in the Nineteenth Century South By Candace Bailey. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2021.","authors":"Aldona Dye","doi":"10.1017/S1752196323000068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robin presents to me overwhelming evidence of Bang on a Can’s deep embrace of neoliberalism, but he never considers the impact of neoliberalism as an ideology that shapes music. This is especially striking given composers such as Cornelius Cardew and Ivan Tcherepnin and classmates of Lang, Gordon, and Wolfe are quoted in the book voicing sincere objections to capitalism. Robin, however, never deeply engages with such critiques. Race and gender are similarly considered here only with reference to Bang on aCan’s claim that, in relation to classicalmusicmore generally, they improved the racial and gender make-up of their programs. These are important issues that continue to trouble many in the field. A lack of stated aims beyond Robin’s descriptions of the book’s contents exacerbates these omissions. The resulting arguments may thus ultimately be frustrating to those searching for ways to imagine a better future for newmusic. In summary, Robin’s work presents a compelling account of Bang on aCan. It offers useful insights for researchers of classical music, especially those interested in new music, its funding, and its position in the recording industry in the late 1980s and 1990s. The book is eminently readable at the non-specialist level, suitable for undergraduates.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":"17 1","pages":"208 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196323000068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Robin presents to me overwhelming evidence of Bang on a Can’s deep embrace of neoliberalism, but he never considers the impact of neoliberalism as an ideology that shapes music. This is especially striking given composers such as Cornelius Cardew and Ivan Tcherepnin and classmates of Lang, Gordon, and Wolfe are quoted in the book voicing sincere objections to capitalism. Robin, however, never deeply engages with such critiques. Race and gender are similarly considered here only with reference to Bang on aCan’s claim that, in relation to classicalmusicmore generally, they improved the racial and gender make-up of their programs. These are important issues that continue to trouble many in the field. A lack of stated aims beyond Robin’s descriptions of the book’s contents exacerbates these omissions. The resulting arguments may thus ultimately be frustrating to those searching for ways to imagine a better future for newmusic. In summary, Robin’s work presents a compelling account of Bang on aCan. It offers useful insights for researchers of classical music, especially those interested in new music, its funding, and its position in the recording industry in the late 1980s and 1990s. The book is eminently readable at the non-specialist level, suitable for undergraduates.
Robin向我展示了Bang on a Can对新自由主义的深刻拥抱的压倒性证据,但他从未将新自由主义作为一种塑造音乐的意识形态来看待。这一点尤其引人注目,因为书中引用了科尼利厄斯·卡杜和伊万·切列普宁等作曲家以及朗、戈登和沃尔夫的同学对资本主义的真诚反对。然而,罗宾从来没有深入参与过这样的批评。种族和性别在这里被类似地考虑,只是参考Bang on aCan的说法,即与古典音乐相比,他们改善了节目的种族和性别构成。这些都是继续困扰该领域许多人的重要问题。除了罗宾对书中内容的描述之外,缺乏明确的目标加剧了这些遗漏。因此,对于那些正在寻找新音乐更美好未来的人来说,由此产生的争论最终可能会令人沮丧。总之,Robin的作品对Bang on aCan进行了令人信服的描述。它为古典音乐研究人员提供了有用的见解,尤其是那些对新音乐、新音乐的资金以及新音乐在20世纪80年代末和90年代唱片业中的地位感兴趣的人。这本书在非专业水平上可读性很强,适合本科生阅读。