An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of imaging flow cytometry (FlowCam) for detecting invasive Dreissened and Corbiculid bivalve veligers

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 LIMNOLOGY Lake and Reservoir Management Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI:10.1080/10402381.2021.1961176
W. Hassett, J. Zimmerman, G. Rollwagen‐Bollens, S. Bollens, T. Counihan
{"title":"An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of imaging flow cytometry (FlowCam) for detecting invasive Dreissened and Corbiculid bivalve veligers","authors":"W. Hassett, J. Zimmerman, G. Rollwagen‐Bollens, S. Bollens, T. Counihan","doi":"10.1080/10402381.2021.1961176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hassett W, Zimmerman J, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Bollens SM, Counihan TD. 2021. An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of imaging flow cytometry (FlowCam) for detecting invasive Dreissened and Corbiculid bivalve veligers. Lake Reserv Manage. 37:406–417. Zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga (D. bugensis) mussels, first introduced from central Asia into the Great Lakes of North America in the late 1980s, have crossed the continental divide and more recently spread across western North America. At the same time, several new technologies have been developed for the early detection of dreissenids, including the FlowCam, a digital imaging-in-flow instrument, intended to detect dreissenid planktonic larvae (veligers). However, the efficacy of this technology has rarely been tested. We experimentally evaluated the FlowCam’s ability to capture identifiable images of quagga mussel veligers under 2 different types of conditions: (i) deionized water, and (ii) Columbia River Basin water (CRBW), including natural sediment and native plankton. We further evaluated the FlowCam’s ability to distinguish between dreissenid veligers and corbiculid veligers (Asian clam, Corbicula fluminea). We interpret our results to indicate that the FlowCam can consistently detect dreissenid veligers across a range of veliger densities. Moreover, the presence of other plankton and detritus only slightly affected dreissenid detection by the FlowCam. However, the orientation of individual bivalve veligers as they were imaged by the FlowCam precluded specific identification of a substantial proportion (24.8%) of veligers as either dreissenid or corbiculid. We suggest that the FlowCam is an important detection tool best utilized as part of a multifaceted approach, including traditional microscopy and possibly environmental DNA.","PeriodicalId":18017,"journal":{"name":"Lake and Reservoir Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"406 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lake and Reservoir Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2021.1961176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Hassett W, Zimmerman J, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Bollens SM, Counihan TD. 2021. An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of imaging flow cytometry (FlowCam) for detecting invasive Dreissened and Corbiculid bivalve veligers. Lake Reserv Manage. 37:406–417. Zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga (D. bugensis) mussels, first introduced from central Asia into the Great Lakes of North America in the late 1980s, have crossed the continental divide and more recently spread across western North America. At the same time, several new technologies have been developed for the early detection of dreissenids, including the FlowCam, a digital imaging-in-flow instrument, intended to detect dreissenid planktonic larvae (veligers). However, the efficacy of this technology has rarely been tested. We experimentally evaluated the FlowCam’s ability to capture identifiable images of quagga mussel veligers under 2 different types of conditions: (i) deionized water, and (ii) Columbia River Basin water (CRBW), including natural sediment and native plankton. We further evaluated the FlowCam’s ability to distinguish between dreissenid veligers and corbiculid veligers (Asian clam, Corbicula fluminea). We interpret our results to indicate that the FlowCam can consistently detect dreissenid veligers across a range of veliger densities. Moreover, the presence of other plankton and detritus only slightly affected dreissenid detection by the FlowCam. However, the orientation of individual bivalve veligers as they were imaged by the FlowCam precluded specific identification of a substantial proportion (24.8%) of veligers as either dreissenid or corbiculid. We suggest that the FlowCam is an important detection tool best utilized as part of a multifaceted approach, including traditional microscopy and possibly environmental DNA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成像流式细胞术(FlowCam)检测侵袭性双壳类寄生虫的实验评价
[摘要]Hassett W, Zimmerman J, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Bollens SM, Counihan TD。2021. 成像流式细胞术(FlowCam)检测侵袭性双壳类寄生虫的实验评价。湖泊保护区管理。37:406-417。斑马(Dreissena polymorpha)和斑驴(D. bugensis)贻贝于20世纪80年代末首次从中亚引入北美五大湖,它们已经跨越了大陆分水岭,最近在北美西部蔓延开来。与此同时,一些新技术已经被开发出来用于早期检测德雷塞德鲷,包括FlowCam,一种用于检测德雷塞德鲷浮游幼虫(veligers)的数字流成像仪器。然而,这项技术的功效很少得到测试。我们通过实验评估了FlowCam在两种不同条件下捕获斑马贻贝的可识别图像的能力:(i)去离子水,(ii)哥伦比亚河流域水(CRBW),包括天然沉积物和原生浮游生物。我们进一步评估了FlowCam区分单蛤和corbiculid蛤(亚洲蛤,Corbicula fluinea)的能力。我们解释了我们的结果,表明FlowCam可以在各种密度的密度范围内一致地检测到德雷森德威利格。此外,其他浮游生物和碎屑的存在仅轻微影响了FlowCam对德莱森德的探测。然而,FlowCam成像的单个双壳瓣虫的方向排除了相当大比例(24.8%)的双壳瓣虫是双壳瓣虫还是双壳瓣虫的特异性识别。我们认为FlowCam是一种重要的检测工具,最好作为多方面方法的一部分,包括传统的显微镜和可能的环境DNA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lake and Reservoir Management
Lake and Reservoir Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Lake and Reservoir Management (LRM) publishes original, previously unpublished studies relevant to lake and reservoir management. Papers address the management of lakes and reservoirs, their watersheds and tributaries, along with the limnology and ecology needed for sound management of these systems. Case studies that advance the science of lake management or confirm important management concepts are appropriate as long as there is clearly described management significance. Papers on economic, social, regulatory and policy aspects of lake management are also welcome with appropriate supporting data and management implications. Literature syntheses and papers developing a conceptual foundation of lake and watershed ecology will be considered for publication, but there needs to be clear emphasis on management implications. Modeling papers will be considered where the model is properly verified but it is also highly preferable that management based on the model has been taken and results have been documented. Application of known models to yet another system without a clear advance in resultant management are unlikely to be accepted. Shorter notes that convey important early results of long-term studies or provide data relating to causative agents or management approaches that warrant further study are acceptable even if the story is not yet complete. All submissions are subject to peer review to assure relevance and reliability for management application.
期刊最新文献
Spatial-temporal shifts in submersed aquatic vegetation community structure resulting from a selective herbicide treatment in Lake Sampson, Florida, USA Relative energy and perceived impact of vessel-generated waves in fetch-limited environments Watershed grassland fires drive nutrient increases in replicated experimental ponds Reservoir siltation and sediment characterization for reuse as construction material in a semi-arid area Assessing the efficacy of spring stocking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) into a eutrophic reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1