Soil organic carbon storage in a tropical freshwater wetland: the influence of vegetation type

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY African Journal of Aquatic Science Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.2989/16085914.2020.1804821
David Were, F. Kansiime, T. Fetahi, T. Hein
{"title":"Soil organic carbon storage in a tropical freshwater wetland: the influence of vegetation type","authors":"David Were, F. Kansiime, T. Fetahi, T. Hein","doi":"10.2989/16085914.2020.1804821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of different vegetation communities on soil organic carbon (SOC) in a tropical freshwater wetland in Uganda was investigated. SOC content, density and storage potential were determined under three different dominant vegetation communities: Cyperus papyrus L., Typha latifolia L. and Phragmites mauritianus Kunth. SOC content (123.7 ± 2.6 SE g C kg−1 dry soil) in C. papyrus was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in both T. latifolia and P. mauritianus, whereas SOC density (kg C m−2) insignificantly varied (p > 0.05) among the three vegetation communities (C. papyrus = 7.2 ± 0.1, T. latifolia = 6.7 ± 0.1 and P. mauritianus = 6.2 ± 0.1). Similarly, for the entire sampled soil depth (0–50 cm), SOC storage potential was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in C. papyrus (36 118.08 ± 552.52 t C km−2), and was in the order of decreasing magnitude: C. papyrus > T. latifolia > P. mauritianus. Plant biomass density, and soil physico-chemical characteristics, bulk density, salinity, pH and temperature were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with SOC. In conclusion, where climate change mitigation is considered as a wetland ecosystem service, restoration priorities for degraded/lost tropical freshwater wetlands need to consider C. papyrus plants. In addition, comparing SOC storage by ecosystems, Uganda’s wetlands contain three times more SOC than is contained in the country’s forests.","PeriodicalId":7864,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Aquatic Science","volume":"46 1","pages":"161 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2989/16085914.2020.1804821","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Aquatic Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2020.1804821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The impact of different vegetation communities on soil organic carbon (SOC) in a tropical freshwater wetland in Uganda was investigated. SOC content, density and storage potential were determined under three different dominant vegetation communities: Cyperus papyrus L., Typha latifolia L. and Phragmites mauritianus Kunth. SOC content (123.7 ± 2.6 SE g C kg−1 dry soil) in C. papyrus was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in both T. latifolia and P. mauritianus, whereas SOC density (kg C m−2) insignificantly varied (p > 0.05) among the three vegetation communities (C. papyrus = 7.2 ± 0.1, T. latifolia = 6.7 ± 0.1 and P. mauritianus = 6.2 ± 0.1). Similarly, for the entire sampled soil depth (0–50 cm), SOC storage potential was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in C. papyrus (36 118.08 ± 552.52 t C km−2), and was in the order of decreasing magnitude: C. papyrus > T. latifolia > P. mauritianus. Plant biomass density, and soil physico-chemical characteristics, bulk density, salinity, pH and temperature were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with SOC. In conclusion, where climate change mitigation is considered as a wetland ecosystem service, restoration priorities for degraded/lost tropical freshwater wetlands need to consider C. papyrus plants. In addition, comparing SOC storage by ecosystems, Uganda’s wetlands contain three times more SOC than is contained in the country’s forests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带淡水湿地土壤有机碳储量:植被类型的影响
研究了乌干达热带淡水湿地不同植被群落对土壤有机碳(SOC)的影响。测定了3个不同优势植被群落:莎草群落(Cyperus papyrus L.)、风叶群落(Typha latifolia L.)和芦苇群落(Phragmites mauritianus Kunth)的有机碳含量、密度和储量潜力。纸莎草群落的有机碳含量(123.7±2.6 SE g C kg - 1)显著高于阔叶草和毛利草群落(p < 0.05),而有机碳密度(kg C - 2)在3个植被群落(纸莎草群落= 7.2±0.1,阔叶草群落= 6.7±0.1,毛利草群落= 6.2±0.1)间差异不显著(p < 0.05)。同样,在整个采样土壤深度(0 ~ 50 cm)上,纸莎草(36 118.08±552.52 t C km−2)的有机碳储量潜力显著高于其他植物(p < 0.05),且储量潜力的递减顺序为:纸莎草(C. papyrus) > t . latifolia > p . mauritianus。植物生物量密度、土壤理化性状、容重、盐度、pH和温度与有机碳呈显著相关(p < 0.05)。总之,当气候变化减缓被视为一种湿地生态系统服务时,退化/消失的热带淡水湿地的恢复优先事项需要考虑纸莎草植物。此外,通过比较不同生态系统的有机碳储量,乌干达湿地的有机碳含量是该国森林的三倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Aquatic Science
African Journal of Aquatic Science MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Aquatic Science is an international journal devoted to the study of the aquatic sciences, covering all African inland and estuarine waters. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original scientific papers and short articles in all the aquatic science fields including limnology, hydrobiology, ecology, conservation, biomonitoring, management, water quality, ecotoxicology, biological interactions, physical properties and human impacts on African aquatic systems.
期刊最新文献
South African coastal outlets and estuaries: what defines an estuary versus an outlet? Water quality monitoring and measuring physicochemical parameters using wireless sensor networks A bibliometric study on diatom DNA meta-barcording for water quality monitoring: a global perspective Analysis of freshwater diatom deformities in the Karoo, South Africa A preliminary study into the detection of fish environmental DNA in selected South African estuaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1