A Qualitative Examination of Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Pedagogical Training for Doctoral Students in Behavioral and Social Sciences Programs at US Schools of Public Health

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy in Health Promotion Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1177/23733799221107606
E. Walker, Alyssa M. Lederer, Jeni A. Stolow
{"title":"A Qualitative Examination of Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Pedagogical Training for Doctoral Students in Behavioral and Social Sciences Programs at US Schools of Public Health","authors":"E. Walker, Alyssa M. Lederer, Jeni A. Stolow","doi":"10.1177/23733799221107606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increasing attention regarding the preparation of doctoral students in schools of public health (SPH) to teach; however, few studies have examined pedagogical preparation for doctoral students in public health-related disciplines. This study aimed to describe the pedagogical training and experiences available for doctoral students in behavioral and social sciences (BSS) programs in SPH and examine the facilitators and barriers to offering pedagogical training and experiences. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were completed with 13 pedagogy instructors, program directors, or administrators in SPH with BSS doctoral programs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Just over half (54%) of the doctoral programs offered or planned to offer a pedagogy course in their curricula. Doctoral students in most programs had access to other teaching training opportunities, most commonly through university centers for teaching and learning. All doctoral programs required or provided students with the option to serve as a teaching assistant and, in some cases, instructor. Key factors contributing to if pedagogical training and experiences were available in the doctoral programs were the degree of priority placed on teaching preparation for doctoral students; logistic challenges, such as time and funding constraints; the level of need to fill teaching assistant and instructor positions; and competencies requiring teaching training for Doctor of Public Health students. Doctoral programs considering changes or expansion of pedagogical training and experiences should consider how to overcome common barriers and leverage facilitators in order to provide students with the best possible pedagogical preparation for both academic and non-academic careers.","PeriodicalId":29769,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799221107606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is increasing attention regarding the preparation of doctoral students in schools of public health (SPH) to teach; however, few studies have examined pedagogical preparation for doctoral students in public health-related disciplines. This study aimed to describe the pedagogical training and experiences available for doctoral students in behavioral and social sciences (BSS) programs in SPH and examine the facilitators and barriers to offering pedagogical training and experiences. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were completed with 13 pedagogy instructors, program directors, or administrators in SPH with BSS doctoral programs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Just over half (54%) of the doctoral programs offered or planned to offer a pedagogy course in their curricula. Doctoral students in most programs had access to other teaching training opportunities, most commonly through university centers for teaching and learning. All doctoral programs required or provided students with the option to serve as a teaching assistant and, in some cases, instructor. Key factors contributing to if pedagogical training and experiences were available in the doctoral programs were the degree of priority placed on teaching preparation for doctoral students; logistic challenges, such as time and funding constraints; the level of need to fill teaching assistant and instructor positions; and competencies requiring teaching training for Doctor of Public Health students. Doctoral programs considering changes or expansion of pedagogical training and experiences should consider how to overcome common barriers and leverage facilitators in order to provide students with the best possible pedagogical preparation for both academic and non-academic careers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国公共卫生学院行为与社会科学专业博士生教育培训的障碍和促进者的定性检验
人们越来越关注公共卫生学院博士生的教学准备工作;然而,很少有研究考察公共卫生学科博士生的教学准备情况。本研究旨在描述SPH行为与社会科学(BSS)项目博士生的教学培训和经验,并考察提供教学培训和体验的推动者和障碍。对SPH的13名教育学讲师、项目负责人或BSS博士项目的管理人员进行了定性半结构化访谈。数据采用专题分析法进行分析。刚刚超过一半(54%)的博士课程提供或计划在其课程中提供教育学课程。大多数项目的博士生都有机会获得其他教学培训机会,最常见的是通过大学教学中心。所有的博士课程都要求或为学生提供担任助教的选择,在某些情况下,还可以担任讲师。有助于在博士项目中获得教学培训和经验的关键因素是,对博士生教学准备的重视程度;后勤挑战,如时间和资金限制;填补助教和教员职位的需要程度;以及需要对公共卫生博士学生进行教学培训的能力。考虑改变或扩大教学培训和经验的博士课程应考虑如何克服常见障碍并利用辅导员,为学生的学术和非学术职业生涯提供尽可能好的教学准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Public Health Preceptorship Through Project ECHO Lowering the Stakes: Quasi-Experimental, Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Restructured Grading Approach in a Graduate Public Health Research Methods Course Design and Implementation of a Course to Meet the Demand for a Skilled Public Health Workforce to Address the Needs of People With Disabilities Recommendations for Integrating Anti-Racist and Inclusive Pedagogy Strategies into Doctoral Teaching Training in Public Health Navigating the Online Classroom: Developing Online Teaching Skills in Graduate Public Health & Health Professions Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1