Learning Environment by the Future Society: Development of School Grounds in Lithuania

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE Landscape Architecture and Art Pub Date : 2018-12-10 DOI:10.22616/J.LANDARCHART.2018.13.12
Liutauras Nekrošius, Indrė Ruseckaitė, Edita Riaubienė
{"title":"Learning Environment by the Future Society: Development of School Grounds in Lithuania","authors":"Liutauras Nekrošius, Indrė Ruseckaitė, Edita Riaubienė","doi":"10.22616/J.LANDARCHART.2018.13.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents particular aspects of educational function of the schoolyard, and argues that such a space could be used for educating the young generation, collaboration and interaction in creating the living environment. Research of Lithuanian schools’ architecture during the last few decades has indicated the practice of using the\nschool courtyard that could be described as “Forgotten Space”. Education scholars pay exclusive attention to the interaction between learning and playing. Urban gardening, environmental monitoring, design-build studios become integral parts of secondary or even primary education. These activities need proper environment. The majority of Lithuanian youth attends schools built in the interwar and soviet periods that rarely fit the up-todate\nparadigm of education and spatial needs. This makes the school environment problematic but, at the same time, perfect as a transformation laboratory for communities as the non-generic “commissioners”, potential driving force of such actions. Architects, landscape architects, urban designers and planners occasionally look at the cooperation with communities as an obstacle or formal “must”. Since 2014, the Faculty of Architecture, VGTU, started to act as a catalyst activating discussions and alternative visions for changes of school spaces, mostly anticipating that the youth (students and school-children) involved would accustom themselves to active and constant co-creation and maintenance of their environment. The overview of the school grounds development in Lithuania during the last century was performed by consistent analysis of different functions. The study of each possible function of school outdoor area was done by applying the three-aspect correlation method: the education theory, legal building regulations and school environment practice. The study of school ground as the contemporary collectively developed playscape presented the results of experimental practices on participatory design and community engagement.","PeriodicalId":40393,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Architecture and Art","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Architecture and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/J.LANDARCHART.2018.13.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents particular aspects of educational function of the schoolyard, and argues that such a space could be used for educating the young generation, collaboration and interaction in creating the living environment. Research of Lithuanian schools’ architecture during the last few decades has indicated the practice of using the school courtyard that could be described as “Forgotten Space”. Education scholars pay exclusive attention to the interaction between learning and playing. Urban gardening, environmental monitoring, design-build studios become integral parts of secondary or even primary education. These activities need proper environment. The majority of Lithuanian youth attends schools built in the interwar and soviet periods that rarely fit the up-todate paradigm of education and spatial needs. This makes the school environment problematic but, at the same time, perfect as a transformation laboratory for communities as the non-generic “commissioners”, potential driving force of such actions. Architects, landscape architects, urban designers and planners occasionally look at the cooperation with communities as an obstacle or formal “must”. Since 2014, the Faculty of Architecture, VGTU, started to act as a catalyst activating discussions and alternative visions for changes of school spaces, mostly anticipating that the youth (students and school-children) involved would accustom themselves to active and constant co-creation and maintenance of their environment. The overview of the school grounds development in Lithuania during the last century was performed by consistent analysis of different functions. The study of each possible function of school outdoor area was done by applying the three-aspect correlation method: the education theory, legal building regulations and school environment practice. The study of school ground as the contemporary collectively developed playscape presented the results of experimental practices on participatory design and community engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来社会的学习环境:立陶宛校园的发展
本文介绍了校园教育功能的特定方面,并认为这样的空间可以用于教育年轻一代,在创造生活环境中进行协作和互动。对过去几十年立陶宛学校建筑的研究表明,使用学校庭院的做法可以被描述为“被遗忘的空间”。教育学者只关注学习和游戏之间的互动。城市园艺、环境监测、设计建造工作室成为中学甚至小学教育的组成部分。这些活动需要适当的环境。大多数立陶宛青年就读的学校建于两次世界大战之间和苏联时期,这些学校很少符合最新的教育模式和空间需求。这使得学校环境问题重重,但与此同时,作为社区的非一般“专员”,作为此类行动的潜在推动力,它是一个完美的转型实验室。建筑师、景观设计师、城市设计师和规划师偶尔会将与社区的合作视为一种障碍或正式的“必须”。自2014年以来,VGTU建筑学院开始充当催化剂,激发对学校空间变化的讨论和替代愿景,主要是期望参与其中的青年(学生和学童)能够习惯于积极和持续的共同创造和维护他们的环境。通过对不同功能的一致分析,对上个世纪立陶宛学校场地的发展进行了概述。运用教育理论、法律建筑规范和学校环境实践三方面的关联方法,对学校室外区域的各种可能功能进行了研究。学校场地作为当代集体开发的游戏景观的研究展示了参与式设计和社区参与的实验实践结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Cardiogram of the Park: Quantitative Analysis of Walking Scenarios of Trakų Vokė Historic Park The importance of silhouette in the perception of the urban landscape. Saldus example Multicriteria assessment of landscape architecture projects: the sustainability perspective Public open space placemaking suitable for adolescents Malpils Manor: architecture, cultural and historical developments. Second half of the 18th century – first quarter of the 21st century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1