{"title":"An Epidemiological Study of Acute Poisoning In a Tertiary\nCare Centre","authors":"P. Jain, Kamalesh Katara, S. Jelia","doi":"10.47799/pimr.0902.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute poisoning represents a real health threat\nin the world. It is a common cause of admission to emergency\ndepartment and in intensive care unit. Periodic clinical and\nepidemiological studies are required to understand the pattern\nof poisoning. This study aims to analyze epidemiological aspect,\nclinical profile, and outcome of acute poisoning in a tertiary\ncare hospital.\nMaterial and Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted\nat Government Medical College Hospital, Kota, Rajasthan. 102\nadmitted patients were taken for study from January 2020 to\nAugust 2020. Epidemiological variables age, sex, type of poison,\nmode of exposure, clinical presentation and outcome were\nstudied.\nResults: The median age was 30.23 years with a male\npredominance (54.9%). The circumstances of poisoning were\nsuicidal, accidental and unknown in 88.2%, 9.8%, and 1.96%\nrespectively. Ingestion was the major route of exposure (98%)\nfollowed by inhalation (1.96%). The majority 33(32.4%) of cases\nwere of Organophosphorus poisoning followed by 17(16.7%)\ncases of Rodenticide poisoning. The main symptoms were\nnausea and vomiting in 90(88.2%) cases. Convulsions were\nnoted in 3(2.9%) patients. Gastric lavage was done for\n92(90.19%). 8 patients (7.84%) were needed mechanical\nventilation. 7 patients (6.86%) were needed vasoactive drugs.\nThe rate of mortality was 8.82%. The aluminium phosphide\npoisoning was responsible for 44.4% deaths.\nConclusion: Study revealed the high mortality associated with\nacute poisoning. Appropriate approach towards poisoning at\ntertiary care center and prevention remains the best strategy\nfor reducing morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.0902.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Acute poisoning represents a real health threat
in the world. It is a common cause of admission to emergency
department and in intensive care unit. Periodic clinical and
epidemiological studies are required to understand the pattern
of poisoning. This study aims to analyze epidemiological aspect,
clinical profile, and outcome of acute poisoning in a tertiary
care hospital.
Material and Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted
at Government Medical College Hospital, Kota, Rajasthan. 102
admitted patients were taken for study from January 2020 to
August 2020. Epidemiological variables age, sex, type of poison,
mode of exposure, clinical presentation and outcome were
studied.
Results: The median age was 30.23 years with a male
predominance (54.9%). The circumstances of poisoning were
suicidal, accidental and unknown in 88.2%, 9.8%, and 1.96%
respectively. Ingestion was the major route of exposure (98%)
followed by inhalation (1.96%). The majority 33(32.4%) of cases
were of Organophosphorus poisoning followed by 17(16.7%)
cases of Rodenticide poisoning. The main symptoms were
nausea and vomiting in 90(88.2%) cases. Convulsions were
noted in 3(2.9%) patients. Gastric lavage was done for
92(90.19%). 8 patients (7.84%) were needed mechanical
ventilation. 7 patients (6.86%) were needed vasoactive drugs.
The rate of mortality was 8.82%. The aluminium phosphide
poisoning was responsible for 44.4% deaths.
Conclusion: Study revealed the high mortality associated with
acute poisoning. Appropriate approach towards poisoning at
tertiary care center and prevention remains the best strategy
for reducing morbidity and mortality.