The Task Bind: Explaining Gender Differences in Managerial Tasks and Performance

IF 8.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Administrative Science Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1177/00018392221124607
Alexandra C. Feldberg
{"title":"The Task Bind: Explaining Gender Differences in Managerial Tasks and Performance","authors":"Alexandra C. Feldberg","doi":"10.1177/00018392221124607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multi-method study of managers in a grocery chain identifies a novel mechanism by which threats of gender stereotypes undermine women’s ability to be effective managers. I find that women managers face a task bind, a dilemma that managers experience as they try to disprove a negative group stereotype by doubling down on one set of tasks at the expense of other essential tasks. My analysis of interview, observational, and archival data reveals that, compared to men, women do more tasks in front of subordinates—in this setting, supervisory tasks “on the floor” of the store—in order to showcase their qualifications as managers. In doing so, they forgo attention to other tasks that are less public but no less important to being effective managers—in this setting, planning tasks in the office of the store. Neglecting office tasks ultimately undermines the profitability of women managers’ departments. This study’s identification of the task bind has implications for theory and practice related to stereotype threat and women leaders, showing how the threat of negative gender stereotypes, prompted here by concern about subordinates’ perceptions, can affect managers’ behaviors in ways that detract from the performance of managers themselves and that of their organizations.","PeriodicalId":7203,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Science Quarterly","volume":"67 1","pages":"1049 - 1092"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Science Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221124607","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This multi-method study of managers in a grocery chain identifies a novel mechanism by which threats of gender stereotypes undermine women’s ability to be effective managers. I find that women managers face a task bind, a dilemma that managers experience as they try to disprove a negative group stereotype by doubling down on one set of tasks at the expense of other essential tasks. My analysis of interview, observational, and archival data reveals that, compared to men, women do more tasks in front of subordinates—in this setting, supervisory tasks “on the floor” of the store—in order to showcase their qualifications as managers. In doing so, they forgo attention to other tasks that are less public but no less important to being effective managers—in this setting, planning tasks in the office of the store. Neglecting office tasks ultimately undermines the profitability of women managers’ departments. This study’s identification of the task bind has implications for theory and practice related to stereotype threat and women leaders, showing how the threat of negative gender stereotypes, prompted here by concern about subordinates’ perceptions, can affect managers’ behaviors in ways that detract from the performance of managers themselves and that of their organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
任务约束:解释管理任务和绩效中的性别差异
这项对一家食品杂货连锁店管理者的多方法研究发现了一种新的机制,通过这种机制,性别刻板印象的威胁削弱了女性成为有效管理者的能力。我发现女性管理者面临着一种任务束缚,当管理者试图通过牺牲其他基本任务而加倍投入一组任务来反驳负面的群体刻板印象时,他们会遇到这种困境。我对访谈、观察和档案数据的分析表明,与男性相比,女性在下属面前做更多的工作——在这种情况下,是在商店的“地板上”完成监督任务——以展示她们作为管理者的资格。在这样做的过程中,他们放弃了对其他任务的关注,这些任务不那么公开,但对成为有效的管理者同样重要——在这种情况下,在商店办公室计划任务。忽视办公室任务最终会损害女性管理者所在部门的盈利能力。本研究对任务绑定的识别对与刻板印象威胁和女性领导者相关的理论和实践具有启示意义,表明负面性别刻板印象的威胁是如何由对下属看法的关注引起的,它会以损害管理者自身和组织绩效的方式影响管理者的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Administrative Science Quarterly, under the ownership and management of the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University, has consistently been a pioneer in organizational studies since the inception of the field. As a premier journal, it consistently features the finest theoretical and empirical papers derived from dissertations, along with the latest contributions from well-established scholars. Additionally, the journal showcases interdisciplinary work in organizational theory and offers insightful book reviews.
期刊最新文献
This Is Why I Leave: Race and Voluntary Departure The Dynamics of Inferential Interpretation in Experiential Learning: Deciphering Hidden Goals from Ambiguous Experience Christina Lubinski. Navigating Nationalism in Global Enterprise: A Century of Indo-German Business Relations Falling Fortunes: The Contingent and Asymmetric Effect of Rankings on Organizational Outcomes Michel Anteby. The Interloper: Lessons from Resistance in the Field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1