The ‘Restoration’ of Our Old Buildings [1904]

Q4 Arts and Humanities Art in Translation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753
Hermann Muthesius
{"title":"The ‘Restoration’ of Our Old Buildings [1904]","authors":"Hermann Muthesius","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Muthesius criticizes restoration architects whose aim is to return a building to an ideal past state, an approach he decries as both impossible (because one cannot replicate the work of a craftsman of 500 years before) and dangerous when nearly successful (because it conceals the stages of the building’s construction). Drawing on the ideas of William Morris, he instead calls for preserving buildings by repairing them where needed in materials that contrast with the rest of the building, thus clearly distinguishing new from old.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"15 1","pages":"10 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Muthesius criticizes restoration architects whose aim is to return a building to an ideal past state, an approach he decries as both impossible (because one cannot replicate the work of a craftsman of 500 years before) and dangerous when nearly successful (because it conceals the stages of the building’s construction). Drawing on the ideas of William Morris, he instead calls for preserving buildings by repairing them where needed in materials that contrast with the rest of the building, thus clearly distinguishing new from old.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旧建筑的“修复”[1904]
Muthesius批评那些旨在将建筑物恢复到过去理想状态的修复建筑师,他谴责这种方法既不可能(因为一个人无法复制500年前工匠的工作),又在接近成功时危险(因为它掩盖了建筑物的建造阶段)。根据威廉·莫里斯的想法,他呼吁通过在需要的地方修复建筑物,并使用与建筑物其他部分形成对比的材料来保护建筑物,从而清楚地区分新旧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Art in Translation
Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Prospects or the End of Neo-Dadaism The Black Flowers of Robert Mapplethorpe Roy Lichtenstein Imagination Put on Bread and Water Pollock Exhibition: A Myth Arrives from America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1