Social Media Use in Central and Eastern European Cities: Defining Local Government-Citizen Relationships through Phases

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/nispa-2023-0010
R. Zumofen, Vincent Mabillard, Martial Pasquier
{"title":"Social Media Use in Central and Eastern European Cities: Defining Local Government-Citizen Relationships through Phases","authors":"R. Zumofen, Vincent Mabillard, Martial Pasquier","doi":"10.2478/nispa-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research has shown the potential of social media to disseminate important information as well as transform citizen engagement with government. However, implementation proves difficult, especially in public sector organizations. The success, impact and performance of these new forms of networked interactions are yet to be fully explored, especially at the local level. Many municipalities are experimenting with social media use, but few actively measure their performance on these platforms and their interactions with users. Different frameworks have been proposed to describe government communication types and activity on social media. They are addressed here through three phases that refer to forms of government‐citizen communication on social media. The original assessment method developed here contributes to the existing literature and provides guidance to practitioners. Empirically, our research relies on a database of cities that have between 100,000 and 500,000 inhabitants in European Union member states located in Central and Eastern Europe. It provides social media metrics for these cities (N=82 and compares various indicators on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. This contributes to a better assessment ofhow social media platforms are used by local governments in the region.","PeriodicalId":43378,"journal":{"name":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Research has shown the potential of social media to disseminate important information as well as transform citizen engagement with government. However, implementation proves difficult, especially in public sector organizations. The success, impact and performance of these new forms of networked interactions are yet to be fully explored, especially at the local level. Many municipalities are experimenting with social media use, but few actively measure their performance on these platforms and their interactions with users. Different frameworks have been proposed to describe government communication types and activity on social media. They are addressed here through three phases that refer to forms of government‐citizen communication on social media. The original assessment method developed here contributes to the existing literature and provides guidance to practitioners. Empirically, our research relies on a database of cities that have between 100,000 and 500,000 inhabitants in European Union member states located in Central and Eastern Europe. It provides social media metrics for these cities (N=82 and compares various indicators on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. This contributes to a better assessment ofhow social media platforms are used by local governments in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中东欧城市的社交媒体使用:分阶段界定地方政府与公民关系
研究表明,社交媒体在传播重要信息以及改变公民与政府互动方面具有潜力。但是,执行起来很困难,特别是在公共部门组织中。这些新形式的网络互动的成功、影响和表现还有待充分探索,特别是在地方一级。许多市政当局正在尝试使用社交媒体,但很少有人积极衡量他们在这些平台上的表现以及他们与用户的互动。人们提出了不同的框架来描述政府在社交媒体上的传播类型和活动。这里通过三个阶段来解决这些问题,这些阶段涉及社会媒体上政府与公民沟通的形式。本文开发的原始评估方法有助于现有文献,并为从业者提供指导。根据经验,我们的研究依赖于一个数据库,该数据库包含中欧和东欧欧盟成员国中人口在10万至50万之间的城市。它提供了这些城市的社交媒体指标(N=82),并比较了Facebook、Twitter和Instagram上的各种指标。这有助于更好地评估该地区地方政府如何使用社交媒体平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The 2020 Czech Regional Elections in the Shadow of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Electoral Participation in the Spread of the Pandemic Innovation Policy Coordination: The Role of Communication for Uzbekistan Collaborative Approach on Digital Government Transformation: In-Depth Analysis from Expert Interview Public Policy Failure: The Case of Arts and Sports Policy in Kazakhstan Citizens’ Satisfaction with “Citizens’ Initiatives”: The Case of the Municipality of Ljubljana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1