Should Green Products Be Advertised as Green? Exploring the Factors That Affect Ad Credibility

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Promotion Management Pub Date : 2023-01-08 DOI:10.1080/10496491.2022.2163032
Lorena Carrete, P. Arroyo, Amaranta Arroyo
{"title":"Should Green Products Be Advertised as Green? Exploring the Factors That Affect Ad Credibility","authors":"Lorena Carrete, P. Arroyo, Amaranta Arroyo","doi":"10.1080/10496491.2022.2163032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has marked key milestones including a transition to sustainable consumption. Eco-brands could exploit this conjuncture to advertise their products while pondering how green ad claims are judged as misleading, unsubstantiated, and opportunistic, but also useful and efficient. This study revises the notion that green consumers distrust green advertising by analyzing how green consumerism, conceptualized as a hierarchical construct, moderates the effect of three factors on the credibility of green advertising. An experiment involving the ad claim, product type, and familiarity with the eco-brand was performed in the context of an emerging economy. The statistical analyses show complex interrelationships between the experimental factors and cross effects between factors and the dimensions of green consumerism. Results indicate that eco-brand familiarity increases green ad credibility for products that were designed and launched as green (e.g., hybrid cars and tissue paper) while the type of ad claim (environmental vs. self-benefit) has no significant effect if the product is recognized as green. Results also indicate that of the three dimensions comprising green consumerism, only green purchasing has a direct negative effect on ad credibility. This effect is stronger for low-cost goods whose environmental benefits against regular products are easier to confirm.","PeriodicalId":16879,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Promotion Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"427 - 460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Promotion Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2163032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has marked key milestones including a transition to sustainable consumption. Eco-brands could exploit this conjuncture to advertise their products while pondering how green ad claims are judged as misleading, unsubstantiated, and opportunistic, but also useful and efficient. This study revises the notion that green consumers distrust green advertising by analyzing how green consumerism, conceptualized as a hierarchical construct, moderates the effect of three factors on the credibility of green advertising. An experiment involving the ad claim, product type, and familiarity with the eco-brand was performed in the context of an emerging economy. The statistical analyses show complex interrelationships between the experimental factors and cross effects between factors and the dimensions of green consumerism. Results indicate that eco-brand familiarity increases green ad credibility for products that were designed and launched as green (e.g., hybrid cars and tissue paper) while the type of ad claim (environmental vs. self-benefit) has no significant effect if the product is recognized as green. Results also indicate that of the three dimensions comprising green consumerism, only green purchasing has a direct negative effect on ad credibility. This effect is stronger for low-cost goods whose environmental benefits against regular products are easier to confirm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色产品应该被宣传为绿色产品吗?影响广告可信度的因素探析
2019冠状病毒病大流行标志着向可持续消费过渡等重要里程碑。生态品牌可以利用这一时机为自己的产品做广告,同时考虑如何判断绿色广告的说法是误导的、未经证实的和投机取巧的,但同时也是有用的和有效的。本研究通过分析绿色消费主义如何调节三个因素对绿色广告可信度的影响,修正了绿色消费者不信任绿色广告的观念。在一个新兴经济体的背景下,进行了一项涉及广告声明、产品类型和对生态品牌的熟悉程度的实验。统计分析表明,实验因素和因素之间的交叉效应与绿色消费主义的维度之间存在复杂的相互关系。结果表明,对于设计和推出的绿色产品(例如混合动力汽车和薄纸),生态品牌熟悉度增加了绿色广告的可信度,而如果产品被认为是绿色的,则广告声称的类型(环境vs.自利)没有显著影响。结果还表明,在构成绿色消费主义的三个维度中,只有绿色购买对广告可信度有直接的负向影响。对于低成本产品,这种影响更强,因为低成本产品的环境效益比普通产品更容易得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Promotion Management
Journal of Promotion Management Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Promotion Management will keep you up-to-date on applied research and planning in promotion management. It is designed for practitioners in advertising, public relations, and personal selling, as well as academicians, researchers, and teachers in these areas. Every year, businesses in the United States budget approximately two-thirds of all marketing money into consumer and trade promotions designed to push products through the distribution chain. Any successful brand marketing plan relies on promotion, whether to stimulate immediate sales or ensure continued commerce.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of SERVQUAL on Consumers’ Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Intention to Use Online Food Delivery Services The Social Influences in Consumer-Brand Relationships: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Consumer Age Social Media Advertising Features that Enhance Consumers’ Positive Responses to Ads From Trait to Choice: How Regulatory Focus Shapes Store Promotion Usage The Effects of Relational Bonds on Purchasing Intention in the Live Streaming Context: The Moderating Role of Platform Type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1