Internationalization and digitalization: Their differing role on grocer and non-grocer retailer performance

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2023.07.005
Georgios Batsakis , Vasilis Theoharakis , Chengguang Li , Palitha Konara
{"title":"Internationalization and digitalization: Their differing role on grocer and non-grocer retailer performance","authors":"Georgios Batsakis ,&nbsp;Vasilis Theoharakis ,&nbsp;Chengguang Li ,&nbsp;Palitha Konara","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the interplay between two critical phenomena in retailing, i.e., internationalization and digitalization, while accounting for retail sector differences. On one hand, internationalization allows retailers to access a wider range of markets, and on the other, digital channel expansion enhances customer reach and convenience within international markets. More specifically, we examine the relationship between retailer internationalization and performance (I-P relationship), and how this relationship is contingent upon the idiosyncrasies of retail sectors (i.e., grocery vs. non-grocery), digitalization, and their combined effects. Building on the liability of foreignness perspective, we first argue that the I-P relationship is U-shaped, because internationalizing retailers initially incur greater costs in their international expansion owing to their unfamiliarity with foreign markets, but as their foreign presence increases, they benefit from greater market power, experience, and scale economies. Then, we contend that as grocers suffer from higher levels of liability of foreignness due to increased requirements for host country embeddedness, non-grocers benefit more from internationalization with any gains and losses further amplified by digitalization. Hypotheses are tested against a panel of the 234 largest international retailers in the world over a 21-year period (1997–2017) and findings support the conjectures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435923000337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between two critical phenomena in retailing, i.e., internationalization and digitalization, while accounting for retail sector differences. On one hand, internationalization allows retailers to access a wider range of markets, and on the other, digital channel expansion enhances customer reach and convenience within international markets. More specifically, we examine the relationship between retailer internationalization and performance (I-P relationship), and how this relationship is contingent upon the idiosyncrasies of retail sectors (i.e., grocery vs. non-grocery), digitalization, and their combined effects. Building on the liability of foreignness perspective, we first argue that the I-P relationship is U-shaped, because internationalizing retailers initially incur greater costs in their international expansion owing to their unfamiliarity with foreign markets, but as their foreign presence increases, they benefit from greater market power, experience, and scale economies. Then, we contend that as grocers suffer from higher levels of liability of foreignness due to increased requirements for host country embeddedness, non-grocers benefit more from internationalization with any gains and losses further amplified by digitalization. Hypotheses are tested against a panel of the 234 largest international retailers in the world over a 21-year period (1997–2017) and findings support the conjectures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际化和数字化:它们对杂货商和非杂货商零售商业绩的不同作用
本研究探讨了零售业中两个关键现象,即国际化和数字化之间的相互作用,同时考虑了零售行业的差异。一方面,国际化使零售商能够进入更广泛的市场,另一方面,数字渠道的扩张提高了国际市场的客户范围和便利性。更具体地说,我们研究了零售商国际化与绩效之间的关系(I-P关系),以及这种关系如何取决于零售部门的特质(即杂货与非杂货)、数字化及其综合效应。基于外国责任的观点,我们首先认为I-P关系是u型的,因为国际化零售商最初由于不熟悉国外市场而在国际扩张中产生更大的成本,但随着他们在国外的存在增加,他们从更大的市场力量、经验和规模经济中受益。然后,我们认为,由于对东道国嵌入性的要求增加,杂货商承受着更高水平的外国责任,非杂货商从国际化中受益更多,任何收益和损失都被数字化进一步放大。在21年(1997-2017)的时间里,对世界上234家最大的国际零售商进行了测试,结果支持了这些假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Bargaining with algorithms: How consumers respond to offers proposed by algorithms versus humans Quiet sellers: When introversion drives salesperson performance Understanding shoppers’ attention to price information at the point of consideration using in-store ambulatory eye-tracking FM ii: Copyright/ ID Statement Navigating the complexities of retail mergers in a changing landscape: A call for deeper insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1