Performance of urban rail transit: a review of measures and interdependencies

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2023.2166146
Farah A. Awad , Daniel J. Graham , Laila AitBihiOuali , Ramandeep Singh
{"title":"Performance of urban rail transit: a review of measures and interdependencies","authors":"Farah A. Awad ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Graham ,&nbsp;Laila AitBihiOuali ,&nbsp;Ramandeep Singh","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2023.2166146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent years saw immense growth in performance measurement literature related to public transit systems, with a clear segmentation between financial and quality-of-service performance frameworks. Recently, there has been a shift away from considering cost efficiency alone as a performance measure, and quality-of-service – which influences ridership attraction and retention – has been receiving more interest. The segmentation of these two performance aspects poses a gap in the literature, as there are interdependencies between them. This study provides a systematic review of the methodologies and empirical findings of studies on both performance measurement aspects of urban rail transit systems; specifically, we demonstrate the importance of linking cost efficiency analyses to the level of service quality. To our knowledge, this is the first review of urban rail transit research that links the two performance aspects. We begin by reviewing the methodological limitations of cost performance measures and summarising the drivers of cost performance in the existing literature. We then review studies on the definitions and measurements of quality-of-service in urban rail performance. Lastly, we summarise the scant literature linking the two performance aspects and highlight future study directions, mainly, the importance of a structural framework to provide a holistic view of transit operators’ performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 698-725"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164723000089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recent years saw immense growth in performance measurement literature related to public transit systems, with a clear segmentation between financial and quality-of-service performance frameworks. Recently, there has been a shift away from considering cost efficiency alone as a performance measure, and quality-of-service – which influences ridership attraction and retention – has been receiving more interest. The segmentation of these two performance aspects poses a gap in the literature, as there are interdependencies between them. This study provides a systematic review of the methodologies and empirical findings of studies on both performance measurement aspects of urban rail transit systems; specifically, we demonstrate the importance of linking cost efficiency analyses to the level of service quality. To our knowledge, this is the first review of urban rail transit research that links the two performance aspects. We begin by reviewing the methodological limitations of cost performance measures and summarising the drivers of cost performance in the existing literature. We then review studies on the definitions and measurements of quality-of-service in urban rail performance. Lastly, we summarise the scant literature linking the two performance aspects and highlight future study directions, mainly, the importance of a structural framework to provide a holistic view of transit operators’ performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市轨道交通的绩效:对措施和相互依赖关系的回顾
近年来,与公共交通系统相关的绩效衡量文献有了巨大的增长,在财务和服务质量绩效框架之间有了明确的划分。最近,人们不再仅仅把成本效率作为一种绩效衡量标准,而服务质量——影响乘客的吸引力和留存率——受到了更多的关注。这两个性能方面的分割在文献中造成了差距,因为它们之间存在相互依赖关系。本研究对城市轨道交通系统绩效评估的方法和实证研究结果进行了系统回顾;具体来说,我们展示了将成本效率分析与服务质量水平联系起来的重要性。据我们所知,这是城市轨道交通研究中第一次将两个绩效方面联系起来的综述。我们首先回顾了成本绩效测量的方法局限性,并总结了现有文献中成本绩效的驱动因素。然后,我们回顾了有关城市轨道交通绩效中服务质量的定义和测量的研究。最后,我们总结了将这两个绩效方面联系起来的文献,并强调了未来的研究方向,主要是结构框架的重要性,以提供交通运营商绩效的整体观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting travel in urban America: the socio-technical life of an engineering modeling world Spatial factors associated with usage of different on-demand elements within mobility hubs: a systematic literature review Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here? Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review A survey on reinforcement learning-based control for signalized intersections with connected automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1