Comparison of hermetic bags with polyethylene-lined polypropylene bags for prolonged storage of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds in Ethiopia

IF 5 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Legume Science Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1002/leg3.190
Astawus Esatu Seifu, Karta Kaske Kalsa, Hasen Seid Aweke, Girma Debele Dibaba
{"title":"Comparison of hermetic bags with polyethylene-lined polypropylene bags for prolonged storage of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds in Ethiopia","authors":"Astawus Esatu Seifu,&nbsp;Karta Kaske Kalsa,&nbsp;Hasen Seid Aweke,&nbsp;Girma Debele Dibaba","doi":"10.1002/leg3.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poor storage facilities expose seeds to deterioration, resulting in low seed quality under a prolonged storage time. We compared the performance of five bag types: Two hermetic bags (Super GrainPro bag [SGB] and Purdue Improved Crop Storage bag [PICS]), with three non-hermetic bags (woven polypropylene bag lined with polyethylene [WPP lined with PE], polypropylene bags [PP], and jute bags) for the storage of faba bean seeds for 24 months. Faba bean seed quality was assessed under ambient conditions after 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of storage. Parameters investigated include seed moisture content, thousand seed weight, germination percentages, vigor index I and II, speed of germination, percentage of insect-damaged seed, and insect counts. Results indicated that there was a significant (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) interaction of bag types and duration for all tested parameters. Hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE maintained germination percentage above 90% during 12 months of storage. The vigor index remained above 1600 mg% for hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE during 12 months of storage. However, non-hermetic bags exhibited a rapid drop in vigor index beginning from 6 months of storage. Hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE allowed minimal insect breeding and hence decreased the seed damage caused by insects. The present results demonstrated that in addition to the PICS bags and SGB, the WPP lined with PE can be used for short-period storage for up to 12 months without incurring a significant loss of seed quality. Hence, we recommend the introduction of WPP lined with PE as faba bean seed storage technique under conditions where hermetic bags are inaccessible to resource-poor farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor storage facilities expose seeds to deterioration, resulting in low seed quality under a prolonged storage time. We compared the performance of five bag types: Two hermetic bags (Super GrainPro bag [SGB] and Purdue Improved Crop Storage bag [PICS]), with three non-hermetic bags (woven polypropylene bag lined with polyethylene [WPP lined with PE], polypropylene bags [PP], and jute bags) for the storage of faba bean seeds for 24 months. Faba bean seed quality was assessed under ambient conditions after 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of storage. Parameters investigated include seed moisture content, thousand seed weight, germination percentages, vigor index I and II, speed of germination, percentage of insect-damaged seed, and insect counts. Results indicated that there was a significant (P ≤ 0.01) interaction of bag types and duration for all tested parameters. Hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE maintained germination percentage above 90% during 12 months of storage. The vigor index remained above 1600 mg% for hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE during 12 months of storage. However, non-hermetic bags exhibited a rapid drop in vigor index beginning from 6 months of storage. Hermetic bags and WPP lined with PE allowed minimal insect breeding and hence decreased the seed damage caused by insects. The present results demonstrated that in addition to the PICS bags and SGB, the WPP lined with PE can be used for short-period storage for up to 12 months without incurring a significant loss of seed quality. Hence, we recommend the introduction of WPP lined with PE as faba bean seed storage technique under conditions where hermetic bags are inaccessible to resource-poor farmers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚蚕豆(Vicia faba L.)种子长期储存的密闭袋与聚乙烯内衬聚丙烯袋的比较
贮藏条件差,种子易变质,贮藏时间长,籽粒质量低。我们比较了五种袋子类型的性能:两种密封袋(超级谷物袋[SGB]和普度改良作物储存袋[PICS])和三种非密封袋(编织聚丙烯袋内衬聚乙烯[WPP内衬聚乙烯],聚丙烯袋[PP]和黄麻袋)储存蚕豆种子24个月。在常温条件下,分别对贮藏0、6、12、18和24个月的蚕豆种子进行品质评价。考察的参数包括种子含水量、千粒重、发芽率、活力指数I和II、发芽率、虫蛀率和昆虫数。结果表明,袋型与持续时间的交互作用显著(P≤0.01)。密封袋和PE衬里WPP在12个月的贮藏期间,发芽率保持在90%以上。密闭袋和PE衬里WPP贮藏12个月的活力指数保持在1600mg %以上。而非密封袋贮藏6个月后,活力指数迅速下降。密封袋和内衬聚乙烯的WPP使昆虫繁殖最小化,从而减少了昆虫对种子造成的损害。结果表明,除了PICS袋和SGB外,PE衬里的WPP可用于短期贮藏,最长可达12个月,而不会造成种子质量的显著损失。因此,我们建议在资源贫乏的农民无法使用密封袋的情况下,采用WPP内衬PE作为蚕豆种子储存技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Dry and Steam Thermal Pretreatments on the Structural Properties and Flowability of Faba Bean Flours An Optimised Protocol for Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Tissue Culture and Transformation Impact of On-Farm Storage Technologies and Storage Durations on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Health: A Comparative Study Across Diverse Agroecologies Influence of Plant Genotype on Nodule-Associated Bacterial Community Composition and Function in Seasonal Field Pea Varieties Genetic and Environmental Variation in Health-Promoting l-Homoarginine and Neurotoxic β-ODAP in Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1