Prospective Study on PDL Anesthesia as an Aide to Decrease Palatal Infiltration Pain.

Q3 Medicine Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.2344/anpr-68-03-03
B. Crump, A. Reader, J. Nusstein, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, J. Draper
{"title":"Prospective Study on PDL Anesthesia as an Aide to Decrease Palatal Infiltration Pain.","authors":"B. Crump, A. Reader, J. Nusstein, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, J. Draper","doi":"10.2344/anpr-68-03-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe purpose of this prospective randomized study was to assess using a periodontal ligament (PDL) injection as an aide to decrease palatal infiltration pain.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA total of 133 subjects randomly received a PDL injection and alternative palatal infiltration or a mock PDL injection and conventional palatal infiltration at 2 separate appointments. PDL injection was given in the mid-palatal sulcus of the maxillary first molar. Mock PDL injection consisted of only needle insertion. All subjects then received a palatal infiltration administered into the blanched gingival tissue 3 mm (alternative palatal infiltration) or 7 mm (conventional palatal infiltration) from the gingival collar. Subjects recorded needle insertion and solution deposition pain using a Heft-Parker visual analog scale (VAS).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe combined PDL injection and alternative palatal infiltration had significantly decreased mean VAS ratings for needle insertion and solution deposition pain (P < .0001). Incidence of moderate/severe pain for needle insertion and solution deposition was reduced from 65% to 1% and from 65% to 2%, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nProviding PDL anesthesia into the mid-palatal sulcus of the maxillary first molar and then administering an alternative palatal infiltration into the blanched collar around the PDL molar site led to significant reductions in needle insertion and solution deposition pain compared with a mock PDL and conventional palatal infiltration.","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"69 1 1","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-68-03-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to assess using a periodontal ligament (PDL) injection as an aide to decrease palatal infiltration pain. METHODS A total of 133 subjects randomly received a PDL injection and alternative palatal infiltration or a mock PDL injection and conventional palatal infiltration at 2 separate appointments. PDL injection was given in the mid-palatal sulcus of the maxillary first molar. Mock PDL injection consisted of only needle insertion. All subjects then received a palatal infiltration administered into the blanched gingival tissue 3 mm (alternative palatal infiltration) or 7 mm (conventional palatal infiltration) from the gingival collar. Subjects recorded needle insertion and solution deposition pain using a Heft-Parker visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS The combined PDL injection and alternative palatal infiltration had significantly decreased mean VAS ratings for needle insertion and solution deposition pain (P < .0001). Incidence of moderate/severe pain for needle insertion and solution deposition was reduced from 65% to 1% and from 65% to 2%, respectively. CONCLUSION Providing PDL anesthesia into the mid-palatal sulcus of the maxillary first molar and then administering an alternative palatal infiltration into the blanched collar around the PDL molar site led to significant reductions in needle insertion and solution deposition pain compared with a mock PDL and conventional palatal infiltration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PDL麻醉辅助减轻腭部浸润性疼痛的前瞻性研究。
目的本前瞻性随机研究的目的是评估使用牙周膜(PDL)注射作为减轻腭部浸润疼痛的辅助药物。方法共有133名受试者在2个单独的预约中随机接受PDL注射和替代性腭部浸润,或模拟PDL注射并常规腭部浸润。PDL注射于上颌第一磨牙腭中沟。模拟PDL注射仅包括针头插入。然后,所有受试者接受腭部浸润,该腭部浸润施用到距牙龈环3mm(替代性腭部浸润)或7mm(常规腭部渗透)的漂白牙龈组织中。受试者使用Heft-Parker视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录针头插入和溶液沉积疼痛。结果PDL注射和替代性腭部浸润相结合显著降低了针头插入和溶解沉积疼痛的平均VAS评分(P<.0001)。针头插入和溶液沉积的中度/重度疼痛发生率从65%降至1%从65%到2%。结论在上颌第一磨牙的腭中沟内提供PDL麻醉,然后在PDL磨牙部位周围的漂白套环内进行替代性腭部浸润,与模拟PDL和传统腭部浸润相比,可显著减少针头插入和溶液沉积疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Sedation Levels Using SedLine During Intravenous Sedation for Dental Procedures: A Case-Series Study. Cardiac Arrest Due to Pacing Failure From Pilsicainide Poisoning. A New Dental Specialty in Canada. Literature Review for Office-Based Anesthesia. Hypotension Without Skin Symptoms at Local Anesthesia in Dental Treatment: Anaphylaxis? Or Vasovagal Reaction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1