Reliability and Validity of Light-Intensity Physical Activity Scales in Adults: A Systematic Review

IF 1.7 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2022.2120356

R. Tanaka, Kanako Yakushiji, Satomi Tanaka, Michihiro Tsubaki, K. Fujita

{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Light-Intensity Physical Activity Scales in Adults: A Systematic Review","authors":"R. Tanaka, Kanako Yakushiji, Satomi Tanaka, Michihiro Tsubaki, K. Fujita","doi":"10.1080/1091367X.2022.2120356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to review the validity and/or reliability of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) questionnaires and identify the most suitable questionnaires for measurement of LPA in adults. Following the PRISMA-P 2020 guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and MedNar. Only studies that targeted adults ≥18 years old and used LPA measured by accelerometer and/or heart rate monitor as an objective criterion were included. The search resulted in 2748 article hits, from which we extracted 16 studies with 14 questionnaires. The 7-Day Sedentary and LPA Log and LPA Questionnaire were specifically designed for LPA measurement, and the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors physical activity self-report questionnaire scale has been revised for LPA measurement. These questionnaires had comparatively high reliability and validity in this review. Most studies contained methodological limitations such as test-retest period. In the future, more accurate reliability/validity studies should be conducted for each questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"136 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2022.2120356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to review the validity and/or reliability of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) questionnaires and identify the most suitable questionnaires for measurement of LPA in adults. Following the PRISMA-P 2020 guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and MedNar. Only studies that targeted adults ≥18 years old and used LPA measured by accelerometer and/or heart rate monitor as an objective criterion were included. The search resulted in 2748 article hits, from which we extracted 16 studies with 14 questionnaires. The 7-Day Sedentary and LPA Log and LPA Questionnaire were specifically designed for LPA measurement, and the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors physical activity self-report questionnaire scale has been revised for LPA measurement. These questionnaires had comparatively high reliability and validity in this review. Most studies contained methodological limitations such as test-retest period. In the future, more accurate reliability/validity studies should be conducted for each questionnaire.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

成人轻度体力活动量表的信度和有效性：系统评价

摘要:本研究旨在回顾轻强度体力活动(LPA)问卷的有效性和/或可靠性，并确定最适合测量成人LPA的问卷。按照PRISMA-P 2020指南，我们检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus、Embase和MedNar。仅纳入针对≥18岁成人并使用加速计和/或心率监测仪测量LPA作为客观标准的研究。我们检索了2748篇文章，从中提取了16项研究和14份问卷。专为LPA测量设计了7天久坐与LPA日志和LPA问卷，并修订了老年人社区健康活动模型项目身体活动自述问卷量表用于LPA测量。本调查问卷具有较高的信度和效度。大多数研究都有方法上的限制，如测试-再测试周期。未来需要对每份问卷进行更准确的信度/效度研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The scope of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science (MPEES) covers original measurement research, special issues, and tutorials within six substantive disciplines of physical education and exercise science. Six of the seven sections of MPEES define the substantive disciplines within the purview of the original research to be published in the journal: Exercise Science, Physical Activity, Physical Education Pedagogy, Psychology, Research Methodology and Statistics, and Sport Management and Administration. The seventh section of MPEES, Tutorial and Teacher’s Toolbox, serves to provide an outlet for review and/or didactic manuscripts to be published in the journal. Special issues provide an avenue for a coherent set of manuscripts (e.g., four to five) to collectively focus in-depth on an important and timely measurement-related issue within the scope of MPEES. The primary aim of MPEES is to publish high-impact manuscripts, most of which will focus on original research, that fit within the scope of the journal.