Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system

Huan Yang, Ying Zhou, Ping Chen, Qing Du, B. Zheng, Tian Pu, Jing Wen, W. Yang, T. Yong
{"title":"Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system","authors":"Huan Yang, Ying Zhou, Ping Chen, Qing Du, B. Zheng, Tian Pu, Jing Wen, W. Yang, T. Yong","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1006.2022.13017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To clarify the difference of nutrient uptake and utilization to yield advantage between maize-soybean relay intercropping and maize-peanut intercropping, we conducted a field experiment for two consecutive years. The results were obtained by comparing nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) absorption efficiency and utilization in the intercropping with sole cropping. The results showed that land equivalent ratio (LER) of maize-soybean relay intercropping was 1.16–1.72, which had the advantage of intercropping yield, but the LER of maize-peanut intercropping was 0.89–1.13, which had no obvious yield disad-vantage. In maize-soybean relay intercropping system, the amount of N, P, and K uptake was higher than that of the corresponding sole cropping by 32.60%  54.22%, 27.35%–34.64, intercropping system, the amount of N, P, and K uptake was higher than that of the corresponding sole cropping by –7.86% to 31.58%, 23.09%–46.52%, and 1.60%–55.48%, respectively, and the N utilization efficiency was higher by 7.55–26.60. The contributions of the N, P and K uptake efficiencies to LER were 0–0.22, 0.05–0.27, and –0.11–0.32, respectively, and the utilization efficiencies contributions were –0.25  0.19, –0.32–0.11, and –0.47–0.32, respectively. In conclusion, yield advantage of maize-soybean relay intercropping was mainly from enhanced nutrient uptake efficiency, but there was no obvious yield advantage in maize-peanut intercropping mainly due to relatively less contribution of nutrient uptake to yield advantage.","PeriodicalId":52132,"journal":{"name":"作物学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"作物学报","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1006.2022.13017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: To clarify the difference of nutrient uptake and utilization to yield advantage between maize-soybean relay intercropping and maize-peanut intercropping, we conducted a field experiment for two consecutive years. The results were obtained by comparing nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) absorption efficiency and utilization in the intercropping with sole cropping. The results showed that land equivalent ratio (LER) of maize-soybean relay intercropping was 1.16–1.72, which had the advantage of intercropping yield, but the LER of maize-peanut intercropping was 0.89–1.13, which had no obvious yield disad-vantage. In maize-soybean relay intercropping system, the amount of N, P, and K uptake was higher than that of the corresponding sole cropping by 32.60%  54.22%, 27.35%–34.64, intercropping system, the amount of N, P, and K uptake was higher than that of the corresponding sole cropping by –7.86% to 31.58%, 23.09%–46.52%, and 1.60%–55.48%, respectively, and the N utilization efficiency was higher by 7.55–26.60. The contributions of the N, P and K uptake efficiencies to LER were 0–0.22, 0.05–0.27, and –0.11–0.32, respectively, and the utilization efficiencies contributions were –0.25  0.19, –0.32–0.11, and –0.47–0.32, respectively. In conclusion, yield advantage of maize-soybean relay intercropping was mainly from enhanced nutrient uptake efficiency, but there was no obvious yield advantage in maize-peanut intercropping mainly due to relatively less contribution of nutrient uptake to yield advantage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米-豆类条带间作系统养分吸收利用对产量的影响
为了阐明玉米-大豆间作和玉米-花生间作在养分吸收和利用方面的差异,我们连续两年进行了田间试验。比较了间作与单作对氮、磷、钾的吸收效率和利用率。结果表明,玉米-大豆间作的土地当量比(LER)为1.16–1.72,具有间作产量优势,而玉米-花生间作的LER为0.89–1.13,没有明显的产量劣势。玉米-大豆间作系统对氮、磷、钾的吸收量比单作高32.60% 间作系统中,N、P和K的吸收量分别比单作提高了-7.86%至31.58%、23.09%至46.52%和1.60%至55.48%,N利用效率提高了7.55至26.60。氮、磷和钾吸收效率对LER的贡献分别为-0.22、0.05-0.27和-0.11-3.32,利用效率贡献为-0.25 分别为0.19、-0.32–0.11和-0.47–0.32。综上所述,玉米-大豆间作的产量优势主要来自于养分吸收效率的提高,而玉米-花生间作没有明显的产量优势,主要是由于养分吸收对产量优势的贡献相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
作物学报
作物学报 Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The major aims of AAS are to report the progresses in the disciplines of crop breeding, crop genetics, crop cultivation, crop physiology, ecology, biochemistry, germplasm resources, grain chemistry, grain storage and processing, bio-technology and biomathematics etc. mainly in China and abroad. AAS provides regular columns for Original papers, Reviews, and Research notes. The strict peer-review procedure guarantees the academic level and raises the reputation of the journal. The readership of AAS is for crop science researchers, students of agricultural colleges and universities, and persons with similar academic level.
期刊最新文献
Difference and molecular mechanism of soluble sugar metabolism and quality of different rice panicle in japonica rice Mechanism of drought and salt tolerance of OsLPL2/PIR gene in rice Allelic variation and geographical distribution of TT8 for seed color in Brassica juncea Czern. et Coss. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1