A sustainable system for decontamination of cephalexin antibiotic using electrocoagulation technology and response surface methodology

Maliheh Arab, S. Danesh
{"title":"A sustainable system for decontamination of cephalexin antibiotic using electrocoagulation technology and response surface methodology","authors":"Maliheh Arab, S. Danesh","doi":"10.1002/rem.21761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of synthetic micropollutants in wastewater due to domestic and industrial use has presented new challenges for treatment processes. Among these pollutants, pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are considered emerging contaminants due to their potential to enter drinking water sources. Antibiotics, in particular, are of significant concern due to their high consumption in veterinary and human applications. In this study, the electrocoagulation (EC) process is used as an efficient technique for the removal of cephalexin (CFX) from pharmaceutical wastewater. The study aims to explore the ability of the EC process to remove CFX and optimize its performance using the response surface method based on Central Composite Design (RSM‐CCD). The effects of initial CFX concentration, electrolysis time, initial pH, and electrode type (non‐insulated and insulated) were considered in the optimization process. This research is distinct as it examines the influence of key factors on the elimination of CFX. The results showed that electrolysis time had the most significant effect on CFX removal using the EC process. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate the importance of independent variables and their interaction. The optimal operating conditions for maximum removal efficiency (86.53%) were an initial cephalexin concentration, reaction time, and initial pH of 34 mg/L, 34.35 min, and 6.5, respectively, using an insulated electrode. Under these optimal conditions, predicted cephalexin removal was 93.54%. These findings demonstrate that RSM‐CCD is a useful tool for optimizing electrochemical removal processes for micropollutants such as CFX from wastewater streams. The study highlights the importance of considering electrode type in optimizing EC processes for micropollutant removal from wastewater.","PeriodicalId":46411,"journal":{"name":"Remediation-The Journal of Environmental Cleanup Costs Technologies & Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remediation-The Journal of Environmental Cleanup Costs Technologies & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of synthetic micropollutants in wastewater due to domestic and industrial use has presented new challenges for treatment processes. Among these pollutants, pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are considered emerging contaminants due to their potential to enter drinking water sources. Antibiotics, in particular, are of significant concern due to their high consumption in veterinary and human applications. In this study, the electrocoagulation (EC) process is used as an efficient technique for the removal of cephalexin (CFX) from pharmaceutical wastewater. The study aims to explore the ability of the EC process to remove CFX and optimize its performance using the response surface method based on Central Composite Design (RSM‐CCD). The effects of initial CFX concentration, electrolysis time, initial pH, and electrode type (non‐insulated and insulated) were considered in the optimization process. This research is distinct as it examines the influence of key factors on the elimination of CFX. The results showed that electrolysis time had the most significant effect on CFX removal using the EC process. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate the importance of independent variables and their interaction. The optimal operating conditions for maximum removal efficiency (86.53%) were an initial cephalexin concentration, reaction time, and initial pH of 34 mg/L, 34.35 min, and 6.5, respectively, using an insulated electrode. Under these optimal conditions, predicted cephalexin removal was 93.54%. These findings demonstrate that RSM‐CCD is a useful tool for optimizing electrochemical removal processes for micropollutants such as CFX from wastewater streams. The study highlights the importance of considering electrode type in optimizing EC processes for micropollutant removal from wastewater.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用电凝技术和响应面法建立头孢氨苄抗生素可持续去污系统
由于生活和工业用途,废水中出现了合成微污染物,这给处理工艺带来了新的挑战。在这些污染物中,药品和个人护理产品被认为是新出现的污染物,因为它们有可能进入饮用水源。尤其是抗生素,由于其在兽医和人类应用中的高消耗量,引起了人们的极大关注。在本研究中,电絮凝(EC)工艺是一种从制药废水中去除头孢氨苄(CFX)的有效技术。本研究旨在探索EC工艺去除CFX的能力,并使用基于中央复合材料设计(RSM-CCD)的响应面方法优化其性能。在优化过程中考虑了初始CFX浓度、电解时间、初始pH和电极类型(非绝缘和绝缘)的影响。这项研究与众不同,因为它考察了关键因素对消除CFX的影响。结果表明,电解时间对EC工艺去除CFX的效果最为显著。方差分析(ANOVA)检验用于评估自变量的重要性及其相互作用。最大去除效率(86.53%)的最佳操作条件是头孢氨苄的初始浓度、反应时间和34的初始pH mg/L,34.35 min和6.5。在这些最佳条件下,预测的头孢氨苄去除率为93.54%。这些发现表明,RSM-CCD是优化废水中CFX等微污染物电化学去除工艺的有用工具。该研究强调了在优化EC工艺去除废水中微量污染物时考虑电极类型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.10%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous removal of chloride and hardness from groundwater by cassava peel biosorption: Optimization and sorption studies Soil washing for removal of per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances from investigation‐derived waste Exploring the effects of B10 biodiesel contamination on Canavalia ensiformis growth and nutrition in artificially contaminated soil Commercial‐scale removal of short‐chain PFAS in a batch‐wise adsorptive bubble separation process by dosing with cationic co‐surfactant Defining the term “Brownfield” in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1