{"title":"A systematic review on available technologies and selection for prosthetic arm restoration","authors":"Bhavesh Pawar, M. Mungla","doi":"10.3233/tad-210353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The design, provision, and assessment of prosthetic arm technologies and related services are all dependent on an understanding of how prosthetic arms are used in everyday life. This research examines the scientific literature on prosthetic arm technologies and approaches that have been used to evaluate upper limb prosthetic arms in daily life use. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review paper is to give an outline of current literature, which covers the selection, design, and choices of prosthetic arm technologies. METHODS: A structural search for the available technologies on the prosthetic arm was carried out. A research database search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, Google Scholar, and questionnaires were evaluated based on available prosthetic arm technologies, material, methodology, comfortability. RESULTS: From the proposed review, it is concluded that not all prosthetic technologies suit the patients because of the difference in injuries. Every prosthetic arm technology has its advantages and limitations depending on end-user requirements and comfortability. Based on the available literature, it is observed that amputees have been given equal importance to comfortability along with functionality. Consequently, amputees may opt for a prosthetic arm technology that is easy to use and comfortable rather than an advanced technology-based prosthetic arm but less with comfortability. CONCLUSION: An attempt has been made for extensive reviews for the various types of prosthetic systems, materials, usability, methodologies, comfortability, etc. Comparative studies on various types of available prosthetic arm technologies have been also carried out with pros and cons. More specifically, the proposed paper provides a significant review of the upper limb prosthetic arm’s current developments and their impacts.","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-210353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The design, provision, and assessment of prosthetic arm technologies and related services are all dependent on an understanding of how prosthetic arms are used in everyday life. This research examines the scientific literature on prosthetic arm technologies and approaches that have been used to evaluate upper limb prosthetic arms in daily life use. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review paper is to give an outline of current literature, which covers the selection, design, and choices of prosthetic arm technologies. METHODS: A structural search for the available technologies on the prosthetic arm was carried out. A research database search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, Google Scholar, and questionnaires were evaluated based on available prosthetic arm technologies, material, methodology, comfortability. RESULTS: From the proposed review, it is concluded that not all prosthetic technologies suit the patients because of the difference in injuries. Every prosthetic arm technology has its advantages and limitations depending on end-user requirements and comfortability. Based on the available literature, it is observed that amputees have been given equal importance to comfortability along with functionality. Consequently, amputees may opt for a prosthetic arm technology that is easy to use and comfortable rather than an advanced technology-based prosthetic arm but less with comfortability. CONCLUSION: An attempt has been made for extensive reviews for the various types of prosthetic systems, materials, usability, methodologies, comfortability, etc. Comparative studies on various types of available prosthetic arm technologies have been also carried out with pros and cons. More specifically, the proposed paper provides a significant review of the upper limb prosthetic arm’s current developments and their impacts.
背景:假肢技术和相关服务的设计、提供和评估都取决于对假肢在日常生活中如何使用的理解。这项研究考察了有关假肢技术和方法的科学文献,这些技术和方法已被用于评估日常生活中使用的上肢假肢。目的:本文的目的是概述当前的文献,包括假肢技术的选择、设计和选择。方法:对现有的假肢技术进行结构检索。在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Crossref、Google Scholar上进行了研究数据库搜索,并根据可用的假肢技术、材料、方法和舒适性对问卷进行了评估。结果:根据拟议的综述,得出的结论是,由于损伤的差异,并非所有的假体技术都适合患者。每种假肢技术都有其优点和局限性,这取决于最终用户的要求和舒适性。根据现有文献,可以观察到截肢者对舒适性和功能性同等重视。因此,截肢者可能会选择易于使用和舒适的假肢技术,而不是基于先进技术但不太舒适的假肢。结论:已经尝试对各种类型的假肢系统、材料、可用性、方法、舒适性等进行广泛的综述。还对各种可用的假肢技术进行了比较研究,包括优缺点。更具体地说,本文对上肢假肢的当前发展及其影响进行了重要回顾。
期刊介绍:
Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.