A Waste of Space? Controversies Surrounding the Working-Class Parlour in Inter-War Britain

IF 0.5 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Home Cultures Pub Date : 2018-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17406315.2018.1610610
Krista Cowman
{"title":"A Waste of Space? Controversies Surrounding the Working-Class Parlour in Inter-War Britain","authors":"Krista Cowman","doi":"10.1080/17406315.2018.1610610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article uncovers the fierce inter-war debate provoked by the British Government’s decision to remove state subsidies for building larger “parlour-type” houses in 1923. Examining the various defences that were put forward in support of the working-class parlour it argues that the parlour was seen as a key marker of respectability in working-class communities with the potential to shape the behaviours and outlook of its inhabitants. Drawing on a variety of contemporary and autobiographical sources it suggests that the occasional use of the parlour, a keystone of its opponents’ criticisms was precisely what gave most value to the room for its owners. Recent controversy over the bedroom tax in Britain suggests that “extra” space remains a contentious issue in subsidised homes today.","PeriodicalId":44765,"journal":{"name":"Home Cultures","volume":"15 1","pages":"129 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17406315.2018.1610610","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2018.1610610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article uncovers the fierce inter-war debate provoked by the British Government’s decision to remove state subsidies for building larger “parlour-type” houses in 1923. Examining the various defences that were put forward in support of the working-class parlour it argues that the parlour was seen as a key marker of respectability in working-class communities with the potential to shape the behaviours and outlook of its inhabitants. Drawing on a variety of contemporary and autobiographical sources it suggests that the occasional use of the parlour, a keystone of its opponents’ criticisms was precisely what gave most value to the room for its owners. Recent controversy over the bedroom tax in Britain suggests that “extra” space remains a contentious issue in subsidised homes today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浪费空间?两次世界大战期间英国工人阶级客厅的争议
本文揭示了1923年英国政府决定取消对建造大型“会客室”房屋的国家补贴所引发的激烈的战争间辩论。研究了支持工人阶级客厅的各种辩护,认为客厅被视为工人阶级社区中受人尊敬的关键标志,有可能塑造其居民的行为和观点。它借鉴了各种当代和自传资料,表明偶尔使用客厅,这是反对者批评的关键,正是它给主人带来最大价值的地方。最近关于英国卧室税的争议表明,在今天的补贴住房中,“额外”空间仍然是一个有争议的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Home Cultures
Home Cultures ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
INSIDE RETIREMENT HOUSING: DESIGNING, DEVELOPING and SUSTAINING LATER LIFESTYLES Living With Things 15 Years on Thinglessness: Without Living Things Affective Clutter: Three Viewpoints on Lived Objects that Create Discomfort at Home Lose, Remain, Regain: Biographic Objects and Forced Migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1