Single-Center Experience With Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infectious Complications in Civilian Cranial Gunshot Wounds

Mark D. Johnson, C. Carroll, D. Cass, N. Andaluz, B. Foreman, M. Goodman, Laura B. Ngwenya
{"title":"Single-Center Experience With Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infectious Complications in Civilian Cranial Gunshot Wounds","authors":"Mark D. Johnson, C. Carroll, D. Cass, N. Andaluz, B. Foreman, M. Goodman, Laura B. Ngwenya","doi":"10.1093/neuopn/okaa013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Despite the widespread adoption of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in civilian cranial gunshot wounds (cGSWs), there remains a lack of consensus on microbial coverage and duration of therapy.\n \n \n \n To analyze a 6-yr experience with prophylactic antibiotics in civilian cGSWs with a focus on infectious complications.\n \n \n \n Records were reviewed for demographic and injury characteristics that could influence the risk of intracranial infection. Patients over 16 yr of age with cGSWs who survived more than 48 h were included. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was initiated at the discretion of the treating neurosurgeon, with eligible patients divided into 3 groups: no prophylaxis, single agent, and multiagent. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine variables contributing to the development of intracranial infection.\n \n \n \n Of 75 eligible patients, prophylactic antibiotics were utilized in 61 (81.3%) with a 5 d median duration. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was significantly higher and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was significantly lower in those who received prophylaxis. Eight intracranial infections were documented (10.7%) over a range of 1 wk to 3 yr from injury. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not contribute to infection, but the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was associated with intracranial infection risk in multivariable regression (odds ratio [OR] = 11.8, P = .013).\n \n \n \n In a cohort of cGSW patients, those with a more severe injury profile were more likely to receive multiagent antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, we found that multiagent antimicrobial prophylaxis did not confer an advantage, and that the presence of CSF leak may be a more important contributing variable to the development of intracranial infection.\n","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/neuopn/okaa013","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okaa013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in civilian cranial gunshot wounds (cGSWs), there remains a lack of consensus on microbial coverage and duration of therapy. To analyze a 6-yr experience with prophylactic antibiotics in civilian cGSWs with a focus on infectious complications. Records were reviewed for demographic and injury characteristics that could influence the risk of intracranial infection. Patients over 16 yr of age with cGSWs who survived more than 48 h were included. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was initiated at the discretion of the treating neurosurgeon, with eligible patients divided into 3 groups: no prophylaxis, single agent, and multiagent. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine variables contributing to the development of intracranial infection. Of 75 eligible patients, prophylactic antibiotics were utilized in 61 (81.3%) with a 5 d median duration. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was significantly higher and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was significantly lower in those who received prophylaxis. Eight intracranial infections were documented (10.7%) over a range of 1 wk to 3 yr from injury. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not contribute to infection, but the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was associated with intracranial infection risk in multivariable regression (odds ratio [OR] = 11.8, P = .013). In a cohort of cGSW patients, those with a more severe injury profile were more likely to receive multiagent antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, we found that multiagent antimicrobial prophylaxis did not confer an advantage, and that the presence of CSF leak may be a more important contributing variable to the development of intracranial infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平民颅脑枪伤抗生素预防和感染并发症的单中心经验
尽管在民用颅骨枪伤(cGSW)中广泛采用了系统性抗生素预防,但在微生物覆盖率和治疗持续时间方面仍缺乏共识。分析6年来在民用cGSW中预防性使用抗生素的经验,重点关注感染并发症。对可能影响颅内感染风险的人口统计学和损伤特征的记录进行了审查。包括存活超过48小时的16岁以上cGSW患者。抗菌预防由治疗神经外科医生自行决定,符合条件的患者分为3组:无预防、单剂和多剂。进行单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归,以确定导致颅内感染发展的变量。在75名符合条件的患者中,61人(81.3%)使用了预防性抗生素,中位持续时间为5天。在接受预防治疗的患者中,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)显著较高,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)显著较低。在受伤后1周至3年内,记录了8例颅内感染(10.7%)。抗生素预防对感染没有影响,但在多变量回归中,脑脊液(CSF)渗漏的存在与颅内感染风险相关(比值比[OR]=11.8,P=.013)。在一组cGSW患者中,那些损伤更严重的患者更有可能接受多药抗微生物预防。然而,我们发现多药剂抗菌预防并没有带来优势,脑脊液渗漏的存在可能是颅内感染发展的一个更重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spinal Venous Vascular Ectasia With Unusual presentation of Abdominal Pain: Case Report Subsuperficial Pectoralis Fascial Placement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Note Awake Surgery for a Patient With Glioblastoma and Severe Aphasia: Case Report Changes in Distributed Motor Network Connectivity Correlates With Functional Outcome After Surgical Resection of Brain Tumors Successful Treatment of Pure Aqueductal Pilomyxoid Astrocytoma and Arrested Hydrocephalus With Endoscopic Tumor Resection Followed by Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Technical Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1