Interseksi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Sharī‘ah di Indonesia

Syamsul Arifin, Nafik Muthohirin, Tongat Tongat, W. Wahyudi
{"title":"Interseksi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Sharī‘ah di Indonesia","authors":"Syamsul Arifin, Nafik Muthohirin, Tongat Tongat, W. Wahyudi","doi":"10.15642/ISLAMICA.2018.12.2.261-287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to uncover the point of encounter of human rights and sharī‘ah in Indonesia which often contradict with each other in light of differences in its development base, both as a concept and, furthermore, as an instrument, which ultimately leads to the human dimension. The basis of the development in question is that human rights derived from human rationality, while sharī‘ah comes from revelation. Therefore, this article seeks to explore the compatibility between the two. Human rights and sharī‘ah always have a point of encounter because in principle they are both fighting for humanity. The intersection between the two is often the case—and it becomes common, because the basis for the development of the law originates from different sources. Human rights comes from human rationality, while sharī‘ah departs from Allah’s revelation. Thus, it is only natural that various debates arise as in general a discourse of knowledge. It’s just that it needs to be understood that the conflict and tension that arise, should not lead to violence. On the one hand, Muslim groups who reject the principles of human rights are undoubtedly existent. However, on the other hand, many Muslims also graciously accept human rights. Accommodative people hold the view that they have a common vision of justice, peace, equality and tolerance. Human rights need not be viewed as contradictory to Islam, in part because many Muslim-majority countries recognize and ratify human rights instruments issued by the United Nations.","PeriodicalId":30844,"journal":{"name":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","volume":"12 1","pages":"279-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ISLAMICA.2018.12.2.261-287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to uncover the point of encounter of human rights and sharī‘ah in Indonesia which often contradict with each other in light of differences in its development base, both as a concept and, furthermore, as an instrument, which ultimately leads to the human dimension. The basis of the development in question is that human rights derived from human rationality, while sharī‘ah comes from revelation. Therefore, this article seeks to explore the compatibility between the two. Human rights and sharī‘ah always have a point of encounter because in principle they are both fighting for humanity. The intersection between the two is often the case—and it becomes common, because the basis for the development of the law originates from different sources. Human rights comes from human rationality, while sharī‘ah departs from Allah’s revelation. Thus, it is only natural that various debates arise as in general a discourse of knowledge. It’s just that it needs to be understood that the conflict and tension that arise, should not lead to violence. On the one hand, Muslim groups who reject the principles of human rights are undoubtedly existent. However, on the other hand, many Muslims also graciously accept human rights. Accommodative people hold the view that they have a common vision of justice, peace, equality and tolerance. Human rights need not be viewed as contradictory to Islam, in part because many Muslim-majority countries recognize and ratify human rights instruments issued by the United Nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚的人权部门和Sharī'ah
这篇文章试图揭示人权和伊斯兰教在印度尼西亚的遭遇点,鉴于其发展基础的差异,这两者往往相互矛盾,无论是作为一个概念,还是作为一种工具,最终导致了人的层面。这一发展的基础是人权源于人的理性,而sharī'ah则源于启示。因此,本文试图探讨两者之间的兼容性。人权和伊斯兰教法总是有冲突点,因为原则上他们都在为人类而战。两者之间的交集往往是这样的——而且变得很常见,因为法律发展的基础来自不同的来源。人权来自人类的理性,而sharī'ah则背离了真主的启示。因此,出现各种各样的辩论是很自然的,一般来说,这是一场知识的讨论。只是需要理解的是,出现的冲突和紧张局势不应该导致暴力。一方面,拒绝人权原则的穆斯林团体无疑是存在的。然而,另一方面,许多穆斯林也欣然接受人权。随和的人认为,他们对正义、和平、平等和宽容有着共同的愿景。人权不必被视为与伊斯兰教相矛盾,部分原因是许多穆斯林占多数的国家承认并批准了联合国发布的人权文书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Institution of Islam Java: Coastal Islam, Local Culture, and the Role of Sufism The Gayo People Philosophy: Genap-Mupakat and Social Harmonization in Central Aceh From Islamism to Democracy: The Case of Rached Ghannouchi and Ennahda of Tunisia Under the Guidance of the Prophet: Charisma and Religious Authority in Contemporary Madura, Indonesia Islamic Press in Surakarta (914-1926): A Study of Medan Moeslimin and Islam Bergerak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1