{"title":"Fabulous Retroactivity: Time and Colonialism in Gordon Bennett’s Possession Island","authors":"D. Manderson","doi":"10.1080/14434318.2020.1837378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Before his untimely death in 2014, not yet aged sixty, Gordon Bennett produced a body of work that must surely count among the most careful and comprehensive reflections on the colonial project undertaken by an Australian artist. His paintings unpack the complex temporal logic that underpinned Australian colonialism, focusing on the central role played by images in colonialism’s construction and legitimation. Unlike, for example, several Australian prime ministers I could mention, Bennett refuses to consign these events to the past, to some concluded historical moment. He demonstrates how the images and visual tropes of colonial representation still form, on some imaginary or subconscious level, a fundamental backdrop to the legitimacy of the Australian legal and political order. In his Home D ecor series (1995–2010), in Terra Nullius (Teaching Aid) As Far as the Eye Can See (1993), and, as we will see, in several versions of Possession Island (fig. 1) painted in 1991, Bennett’s art explores tropes of the colonial imaginary without letting the viewer off the hook. He represents, satirises, and critiques the colonial past’s fantasies of whiteness and blackness, and the crucial role they played in the construction of the Australian state and Australian identity. But we are not permitted to indulge our voyeuristic or nostalgic urges about that past under the protective alibi of our supposed distance from it. That distance he radically foreshortens. Several major contemporary Indigenous artists—Judy Watson and Fiona Foley, among others—describe their art practice in terms of truth-telling or historical research: ‘History’, says Foley, ‘is a weapon’. Bennett approached the problem of Australian memory differently. He chose to excavate not ‘Aboriginal history’ as ‘facts’, but rather representations of that history in the visual archive of Australian colonialism. His raw materials are paintings, drawings, stamps, old newspapers, and school textbooks, a host of fantasies and delusions that nourished and","PeriodicalId":29864,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","volume":"20 1","pages":"253 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14434318.2020.1837378","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14434318.2020.1837378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Before his untimely death in 2014, not yet aged sixty, Gordon Bennett produced a body of work that must surely count among the most careful and comprehensive reflections on the colonial project undertaken by an Australian artist. His paintings unpack the complex temporal logic that underpinned Australian colonialism, focusing on the central role played by images in colonialism’s construction and legitimation. Unlike, for example, several Australian prime ministers I could mention, Bennett refuses to consign these events to the past, to some concluded historical moment. He demonstrates how the images and visual tropes of colonial representation still form, on some imaginary or subconscious level, a fundamental backdrop to the legitimacy of the Australian legal and political order. In his Home D ecor series (1995–2010), in Terra Nullius (Teaching Aid) As Far as the Eye Can See (1993), and, as we will see, in several versions of Possession Island (fig. 1) painted in 1991, Bennett’s art explores tropes of the colonial imaginary without letting the viewer off the hook. He represents, satirises, and critiques the colonial past’s fantasies of whiteness and blackness, and the crucial role they played in the construction of the Australian state and Australian identity. But we are not permitted to indulge our voyeuristic or nostalgic urges about that past under the protective alibi of our supposed distance from it. That distance he radically foreshortens. Several major contemporary Indigenous artists—Judy Watson and Fiona Foley, among others—describe their art practice in terms of truth-telling or historical research: ‘History’, says Foley, ‘is a weapon’. Bennett approached the problem of Australian memory differently. He chose to excavate not ‘Aboriginal history’ as ‘facts’, but rather representations of that history in the visual archive of Australian colonialism. His raw materials are paintings, drawings, stamps, old newspapers, and school textbooks, a host of fantasies and delusions that nourished and
引言在2014年英年早逝之前,戈登·贝内特(Gordon Bennett)创作了一系列作品,这些作品无疑是对澳大利亚艺术家进行的殖民项目最仔细、最全面的反思之一。他的画作揭示了支撑澳大利亚殖民主义的复杂时间逻辑,重点关注图像在殖民主义的构建和合法化中所扮演的核心角色。例如,与我可以提到的几位澳大利亚总理不同,贝内特拒绝将这些事件归咎于过去,归咎于某个已经结束的历史时刻。他展示了殖民地代表的图像和视觉比喻如何在某种想象或潜意识层面上仍然构成澳大利亚法律和政治秩序合法性的基本背景。在他的Home D ecor系列(1995-2010)、Terra Nullius(Teaching Aid)As Far As the Eye Can See(1993)中,以及我们将看到的,在1991年绘制的《占有岛》的几个版本中(图1),Bennett的艺术探索了殖民想象的比喻,而没有让观众摆脱困境。他代表、讽刺和批评了殖民地过去对白人和黑人的幻想,以及他们在澳大利亚国家和澳大利亚身份建构中发挥的关键作用。但我们不允许在我们与过去的距离的保护性不在场证明下,放纵我们对过去的偷窥或怀旧冲动。他从根本上缩短了这种距离。当代几位主要的土著艺术家——朱迪·沃森(Judy Watson)和Fiona·福利(Fiona Foley)等——从真相传播或历史研究的角度描述了他们的艺术实践:福利说,“历史”“是一种武器”。Bennett对澳大利亚记忆问题的处理方式不同。他选择挖掘的不是“原住民历史”作为“事实”,而是在澳大利亚殖民主义的视觉档案中对那段历史的再现。他的原材料是绘画、素描、邮票、旧报纸和学校课本,这些都是滋养和