Conflict, communication and team collaboration: a comparison of Nigerians and US Americans

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-07-2022-0123
William A. Donohue, Deborah A. Cai, E. Fink, Etebong Attah Umana
{"title":"Conflict, communication and team collaboration: a comparison of Nigerians and US Americans","authors":"William A. Donohue, Deborah A. Cai, E. Fink, Etebong Attah Umana","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-07-2022-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nGiven the growing relationship between Nigeria and the USA, the purpose of this study is to compare conflict communication of Nigerians and Americans.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 186 Nigerians and 214 Americans completed an online survey of Hammer’s (2005) Intercultural Conflict Style Inventory as well as items about the effect of conflict on team collaboration.\n\n\nFindings\nContrary to expectations, Nigerians reported using more direct, whereas Americans reported using more indirect, communication when confronting conflict despite the stereotype that Americans are typically direct or more likely to say what is on their minds. However, consistent with expectations, Nigerians reported exercising more emotional restraint, whereas Americans favored the use of emotional expressiveness in conflict.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOverall, Nigerians were more concerned than Americans about the negative effect of conflict on team collaboration in the workplace. This concern was associated with the use of directness, indirectness and emotional restraint. Further, an exploratory structural equation model showed that the use of emotional expression was affected, in different ways, by several aspects of work and communication. Implications of these results are discussed along with directions for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-07-2022-0123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Given the growing relationship between Nigeria and the USA, the purpose of this study is to compare conflict communication of Nigerians and Americans. Design/methodology/approach A total of 186 Nigerians and 214 Americans completed an online survey of Hammer’s (2005) Intercultural Conflict Style Inventory as well as items about the effect of conflict on team collaboration. Findings Contrary to expectations, Nigerians reported using more direct, whereas Americans reported using more indirect, communication when confronting conflict despite the stereotype that Americans are typically direct or more likely to say what is on their minds. However, consistent with expectations, Nigerians reported exercising more emotional restraint, whereas Americans favored the use of emotional expressiveness in conflict. Originality/value Overall, Nigerians were more concerned than Americans about the negative effect of conflict on team collaboration in the workplace. This concern was associated with the use of directness, indirectness and emotional restraint. Further, an exploratory structural equation model showed that the use of emotional expression was affected, in different ways, by several aspects of work and communication. Implications of these results are discussed along with directions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲突、沟通和团队协作:尼日利亚人和美国人的比较
目的鉴于尼日利亚和美国之间日益增长的关系,本研究的目的是比较尼日利亚人和美国人的冲突沟通。设计/方法/方法共有186名尼日利亚人和214名美国人完成了哈默(2005)跨文化冲突风格清单的在线调查,以及关于冲突对团队合作影响的项目。调查结果与预期相反,尼日利亚人报告说在面对冲突时使用了更直接的沟通,而美国人报告说使用了更间接的沟通,尽管人们普遍认为美国人通常更直接或更有可能说出他们的想法。然而,与预期一致的是,尼日利亚人报告说,他们在情感上更加克制,而美国人则倾向于在冲突中使用情感表达。创意/价值总体而言,尼日利亚人比美国人更关心冲突对工作场所团队合作的负面影响。这种担忧与直接性、间接性和情感克制的使用有关。此外,一个探索性的结构方程模型表明,情绪表达的使用受到工作和沟通几个方面的不同影响。讨论了这些结果的含义以及未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1