Offshore outsourcing of R&D to emerging markets: information systems as tools of neo-colonial control

Zehra Sayed, H. Agndal
{"title":"Offshore outsourcing of R&D to emerging markets: information systems as tools of neo-colonial control","authors":"Zehra Sayed, H. Agndal","doi":"10.1108/CPOIB-07-2020-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper analyzes how information systems (IS) can serve as tools of neo-colonial control in offshore outsourcing of research and development work. It draws on critical work examining business and knowledge process outsourcing.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper reports an empirical study of how laboratory information management systems (LIMS) shape offshore outsourcing practices involving Western client firms and Indian contract research organizations (CROs) in the pharmaceutical industry. The study adopted a multi-actor perspective, involving interviews with representatives of Western clients, Indian CROs, system validation auditors, and software vendors. The analysis was iterative and interpretative, guided by postcolonial sensitivity to themes of power and control.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study found that LIMS act as tools of neo-colonial control at three levels. As Western clients specify particular brands of LIMS, they create a hierarchy among local CROs and impact the development of the local LIMS industry. At inter-organizational level, LIMS shape relationships by allowing remote, real-time and retrospective surveillance of CROs’ work. At individual level, the ability of LIMS to support micro-modularizing of research leads to routinization of scientific discovery, negatively impacting scientists’ work satisfaction.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy examining multiple actors’ perceptions of IS, this paper looks beyond the rhetoric of system efficiency characteristic of most international business research. As it explores dynamics of power and control surrounding IS, it also questions the proposition that outsourcing of high-end work will move emerging economies upstream in the value chain.\n","PeriodicalId":46124,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CPOIB-07-2020-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose This paper analyzes how information systems (IS) can serve as tools of neo-colonial control in offshore outsourcing of research and development work. It draws on critical work examining business and knowledge process outsourcing. Design/methodology/approach The paper reports an empirical study of how laboratory information management systems (LIMS) shape offshore outsourcing practices involving Western client firms and Indian contract research organizations (CROs) in the pharmaceutical industry. The study adopted a multi-actor perspective, involving interviews with representatives of Western clients, Indian CROs, system validation auditors, and software vendors. The analysis was iterative and interpretative, guided by postcolonial sensitivity to themes of power and control. Findings The study found that LIMS act as tools of neo-colonial control at three levels. As Western clients specify particular brands of LIMS, they create a hierarchy among local CROs and impact the development of the local LIMS industry. At inter-organizational level, LIMS shape relationships by allowing remote, real-time and retrospective surveillance of CROs’ work. At individual level, the ability of LIMS to support micro-modularizing of research leads to routinization of scientific discovery, negatively impacting scientists’ work satisfaction. Originality/value By examining multiple actors’ perceptions of IS, this paper looks beyond the rhetoric of system efficiency characteristic of most international business research. As it explores dynamics of power and control surrounding IS, it also questions the proposition that outsourcing of high-end work will move emerging economies upstream in the value chain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向新兴市场的研发离岸外包:作为新殖民主义控制工具的信息系统
本文分析了信息系统(IS)如何在研究和开发工作的离岸外包中作为新殖民主义控制的工具。它借鉴了审查业务和知识流程外包的关键工作。设计/方法/方法本文报告了实验室信息管理系统(LIMS)如何影响制药行业中涉及西方客户公司和印度合同研究组织(cro)的离岸外包实践的实证研究。该研究采用了多角色视角,包括与西方客户代表、印度cro、系统验证审核员和软件供应商的访谈。在对权力和控制主题的后殖民敏感性的指导下,分析是反复的和解释性的。研究发现LIMS在三个层面上作为新殖民主义控制的工具。由于西方客户指定了LIMS的特定品牌,他们在当地的cro之间建立了一个层次结构,并影响了当地LIMS行业的发展。在组织间层面,LIMS通过允许远程、实时和回顾性地监督cro的工作来建立关系。在个人层面上,LIMS支持研究微模块化的能力导致科学发现的常规化,对科学家的工作满意度产生负面影响。独创性/价值通过考察多个参与者对信息系统的看法,本文超越了大多数国际商业研究特有的系统效率修辞。在探讨围绕信息系统的权力和控制动态的同时,它也对高端工作外包将推动新兴经济体在价值链上游的主张提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In recent years, the business practices and management philosophies of global enterprises have been subject to increasingly close scrutiny by commentators in the fields of journalism and academia. Such scrutiny has been motivated by a growing desire to examine the nature of globalisation, its impact on specific communities and its benefits for society as a whole. Coverage includes, but is not restricted to, issues of: ■Globalization ■Production and consumption ■Economic change ■Societal change ■Politics and power of organizations and governments ■Environmental impact
期刊最新文献
Understanding academic women’s silence in Poland: exploring with social cognitive theory Sustainability in business education: a systematic review and future research agenda Transcending the DEI contradictions: a Bourdieusian path to social justice in international business De-othering: indigenous perspectives on diversity, equity and inclusion Co-creating inclusion in research practices in the South Pacific: some highlights and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1