A General and Robust Estimation Method for the Case-Time-Control Design

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Methodology Pub Date : 2019-07-22 DOI:10.1177/0081175019862259
A. Sjölander, Y. Ning
{"title":"A General and Robust Estimation Method for the Case-Time-Control Design","authors":"A. Sjölander, Y. Ning","doi":"10.1177/0081175019862259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case-time-control design is a tool to control for measured, time-varying covariates that increase montonically in time within each subject while also controlling for all unmeasured covariates that are constant within each subject across time. Until recently, the design was restricted to data with only two timepoints and a single binary covariate, or data with a binary exposure. Sjölander (2017) made an important extension that allows for an arbitrary number of timepoints and covariates and a nonbinary exposure. However, his estimation method requires fairly strong model assumptions, and it may create bias if these assumptions are violated. We propose a novel estimation method for the case-time-control design, which to a large extent relaxes the model assumptions in Sjölander. We show in simulations that this estimation method performs well under a range of scenarios and gives consistent estimates when Sjölander’s estimation does not.","PeriodicalId":48140,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0081175019862259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175019862259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case-time-control design is a tool to control for measured, time-varying covariates that increase montonically in time within each subject while also controlling for all unmeasured covariates that are constant within each subject across time. Until recently, the design was restricted to data with only two timepoints and a single binary covariate, or data with a binary exposure. Sjölander (2017) made an important extension that allows for an arbitrary number of timepoints and covariates and a nonbinary exposure. However, his estimation method requires fairly strong model assumptions, and it may create bias if these assumptions are violated. We propose a novel estimation method for the case-time-control design, which to a large extent relaxes the model assumptions in Sjölander. We show in simulations that this estimation method performs well under a range of scenarios and gives consistent estimates when Sjölander’s estimation does not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情形时间控制设计的一种通用的鲁棒估计方法
病例-时间控制设计是一种工具,用于控制每个受试者内随时间每月增加的测量的时变协变量,同时也控制每个受检者内随着时间保持不变的所有未测量的协变量。直到最近,该设计还局限于只有两个时间点和一个二进制协变量的数据,或具有二进制暴露的数据。Sjölander(2017)做出了一个重要的扩展,允许任意数量的时间点和协变量以及非二进制暴露。然而,他的估计方法需要相当强的模型假设,如果违反这些假设,可能会产生偏差。我们为案例时间控制设计提出了一种新的估计方法,该方法在很大程度上放松了Sjölander中的模型假设。我们在模拟中表明,这种估计方法在一系列场景下都表现良好,并且在Sjölander的估计不一致的情况下给出了一致的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Sociological Methodology is a compendium of new and sometimes controversial advances in social science methodology. Contributions come from diverse areas and have something useful -- and often surprising -- to say about a wide range of topics ranging from legal and ethical issues surrounding data collection to the methodology of theory construction. In short, Sociological Methodology holds something of value -- and an interesting mix of lively controversy, too -- for nearly everyone who participates in the enterprise of sociological research.
期刊最新文献
Contextual Embeddings in Sociological Research: Expanding the Analysis of Sentiment and Social Dynamics Using Relative Distribution Methods to Study Economic Polarization across Categories and Contexts Can Human Reading Validate a Topic Model? Question-Order Effect in the Study of Satisfaction with Democracy: Lessons from Three Split-Ballot Experiments Comparing the Robustness of Simple Network Scale-Up Method Estimators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1