Multiculturalism and (Neo)liberalism

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Balkan Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-04-07 DOI:10.5840/bjp20201218
M. Bodin
{"title":"Multiculturalism and (Neo)liberalism","authors":"M. Bodin","doi":"10.5840/bjp20201218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions related to the politics and practice of multiculturalism remain hotly debated, even though it is unclear what generally is meant by the term “multiculturalism” and how multiculturalism fits into the politics of liberalism. To many proponents of identity politics movements, ‘normative multiculturalism’ represents an unquestioned good, and collective identities are seen as a primary subject of democratic deliberation and national policy. Liberal activists, however, may be justifiably concerned that this interpretation of multiculturalism impinges on the foundations of liberalism itself, including the core value of perfect equality between autonomous rights-bearing subjects.We respond to these concerns by interrogating the philosophical nature of liberalism and multiculturalism, respectively, and fleshing out the complex relationship that exists between these concepts. Using discourse analysis we find that the discourse of normative multiculturalism corresponds to the broader concept of liberalism – neoliberalism. We argue that the discourse of neoliberalism integrates the model and empirical sense of the classical concept of liberalism and that the goal – normative neutrality towards cultural and other identities – is more efficiently achieved..","PeriodicalId":41126,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Journal of Philosophy","volume":"12 1","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp20201218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions related to the politics and practice of multiculturalism remain hotly debated, even though it is unclear what generally is meant by the term “multiculturalism” and how multiculturalism fits into the politics of liberalism. To many proponents of identity politics movements, ‘normative multiculturalism’ represents an unquestioned good, and collective identities are seen as a primary subject of democratic deliberation and national policy. Liberal activists, however, may be justifiably concerned that this interpretation of multiculturalism impinges on the foundations of liberalism itself, including the core value of perfect equality between autonomous rights-bearing subjects.We respond to these concerns by interrogating the philosophical nature of liberalism and multiculturalism, respectively, and fleshing out the complex relationship that exists between these concepts. Using discourse analysis we find that the discourse of normative multiculturalism corresponds to the broader concept of liberalism – neoliberalism. We argue that the discourse of neoliberalism integrates the model and empirical sense of the classical concept of liberalism and that the goal – normative neutrality towards cultural and other identities – is more efficiently achieved..
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元文化主义与(新)自由主义
与多元文化主义的政治和实践有关的问题仍在激烈辩论,尽管尚不清楚“多元文化主义”一词的一般含义以及多元文化主义如何融入自由主义政治。对于身份政治运动的许多支持者来说,“规范多元文化主义”代表着一种毋庸置疑的好处,集体身份被视为民主审议和国家政策的主要主题。然而,自由主义活动家可能有理由担心,这种对多元文化主义的解释影响了自由主义本身的基础,包括自主权利主体之间完全平等的核心价值观。我们通过分别质疑自由主义和多元文化主义的哲学本质来回应这些担忧,并充实这些概念之间存在的复杂关系。通过话语分析,我们发现规范多元文化主义的话语与更广泛的自由主义概念——新自由主义相对应。我们认为,新自由主义的话语融合了古典自由主义概念的模式和经验意义,并且更有效地实现了目标——对文化和其他身份的规范中立。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Balkan Journal of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed international periodical, academic in spirit, that publishes high-quality papers on current problems and discussions in philosophy. While open to all fields and interests, the journal devotes special attention to the treatment of philosophical problems in the Balkans and south-eastern Europe, and to their influence on the development of philosophy in this region. All papers are publisihed in English. BJP is published under the auspices of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Creativity after Automation Artificial Intelligence: Three Philosophical Interpretations of the Anthropocentric Frame of Reference Review of Nonka Bogomilova's Book The Balkans: Marked Roads (1991-2016), Sofia, 2020 A Theory of Aesthetic Validity, Inspired by Thomas Kuhn The Interrelation between Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Creative Thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1