A Review on the Techniques Used and Status of Equivalent Black Carbon Measurement in Two Major Asian Countries

IF 1.1 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.5572/ajae.2021.044
Arpit Malik, Shankar G. Aggarwal
{"title":"A Review on the Techniques Used and Status of Equivalent Black Carbon Measurement in Two Major Asian Countries","authors":"Arpit Malik,&nbsp;Shankar G. Aggarwal","doi":"10.5572/ajae.2021.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Black Carbon (BC) is a major pollutant that poses immediate health as well as long-term climatic threat to human civilization. Globally, India and China are considered to be among the significant contributors of carbonaceous aerosol. Therefore, in the recent past, several studies on BC measurements have been conducted and reported in both these countries. Optical absorbance measurement techniques which give BC mass by measuring light absorbance of aerosol have been used widely. Keeping these facts in mind, here an attempt has been made to realise the current state of Equivalent Black Carbon (EBC) measurement done in both countries. Eighty EBC measurement studies published in last 15 years (2005–2020) are analysed on the basis of technique, instrumentation and various important parameters involved in measurements. It is found that EBC measurements in India and China contain large uncertainties, and available data are metrologically insufficient to realise spatial distribution and long-term temporal variation precisely. Furthermore, MERRA-2 Surface Black Carbon (SBC) levels and EBC measurements are compared and evaluated for biases between spatial and temporal variation of modelled data and ground measurements. It is observed that standardization of measurement technique and parameters involved in measurement is the need of the hour. Lack of a reference method creates inconsistency and discrepancy among the measurements. Recommendations for selection of parameter/instrument and cautious measures are provided as conclusion based on this review to improve overall metrology of BC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45358,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2021.044.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2021.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black Carbon (BC) is a major pollutant that poses immediate health as well as long-term climatic threat to human civilization. Globally, India and China are considered to be among the significant contributors of carbonaceous aerosol. Therefore, in the recent past, several studies on BC measurements have been conducted and reported in both these countries. Optical absorbance measurement techniques which give BC mass by measuring light absorbance of aerosol have been used widely. Keeping these facts in mind, here an attempt has been made to realise the current state of Equivalent Black Carbon (EBC) measurement done in both countries. Eighty EBC measurement studies published in last 15 years (2005–2020) are analysed on the basis of technique, instrumentation and various important parameters involved in measurements. It is found that EBC measurements in India and China contain large uncertainties, and available data are metrologically insufficient to realise spatial distribution and long-term temporal variation precisely. Furthermore, MERRA-2 Surface Black Carbon (SBC) levels and EBC measurements are compared and evaluated for biases between spatial and temporal variation of modelled data and ground measurements. It is observed that standardization of measurement technique and parameters involved in measurement is the need of the hour. Lack of a reference method creates inconsistency and discrepancy among the measurements. Recommendations for selection of parameter/instrument and cautious measures are provided as conclusion based on this review to improve overall metrology of BC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲两个主要国家当量黑碳测量技术及现状综述
黑碳(BC)是一种主要污染物,对人类健康和长期气候都构成直接威胁。在全球范围内,印度和中国被认为是碳质气溶胶的主要贡献者之一。因此,最近在这两个国家开展并报告了多项有关 BC 测量的研究。光学吸光测量技术通过测量气溶胶的吸光率来得出 BC 质量,这种技术已被广泛使用。考虑到这些事实,我们在此尝试了解这两个国家的等效黑碳(EBC)测量现状。对过去 15 年(2005-2020 年)发表的 80 项 EBC 测量研究进行了分析,分析的基础是测量技术、仪器和涉及测量的各种重要参数。结果发现,印度和中国的 EBC 测量结果存在很大的不确定性,而且现有数据在计量学上不足以精确反映空间分布和长期时间变化。此外,还比较了 MERRA-2 地表黑碳(SBC)水平和 EBC 测量值,并评估了模拟数据和地面测量值的空间和时间变化之间的偏差。据观察,测量技术和测量参数的标准化是当务之急。缺乏参考方法会造成测量结果的不一致和差异。根据本综述的结论,提出了选择参数/仪器和谨慎措施的建议,以改进 BC 的整体计量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristic of PM2.5 concentration and source apportionment during winter in Seosan, Korea A case study on the effect of contaminated inlet tubes on the accuracy of mid-cost optical particle counters for the ambient air monitoring of fine particles Vertical profile measurements for ammonia in a Japanese deciduous forest using denuder sampling technique: ammonia emissions near the forest floor Assessment of vehicle exhaust PM emissions using high-resolution on-road measurements in Seoul, Korea Satellite measurement data-based assessment of spatiotemporal characteristics of ultraviolet index (UVI) over the state of Johor, Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1