Clinical features of neck and shoulder pain (Katakori) in Japanese hospital workers

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Fukushima Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI:10.5387/fms.2022-02
Akira Onda, Keiko Onozato, Masashi Kimura
{"title":"Clinical features of neck and shoulder pain (Katakori) in Japanese hospital workers","authors":"Akira Onda, Keiko Onozato, Masashi Kimura","doi":"10.5387/fms.2022-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Non-specific pain or discomfort in the neck and shoulder girdle, called katakori in Japanese, is a common, chronic musculoskeletal condition worldwide. However, its various clinical features are incompletely characterized, even among medical professionals. We aimed to clarify factors affecting katakori and to investigate objectively the associated neck muscle stiffness and skeletal muscle volume. Methods: All staff members at our private hospital were surveyed about their lifestyle, physical and mental status, and katakori symptoms, using a self-administered questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore possible katakori risk factors. On secondary assessment, ultrasound elastography of the trapezius muscle as well as limb/trunk muscle mass were compared between subjects with severe symptoms and subjects without katakori, using propensity score matching. Results: Of 359 participants enrolled, nearly 75% had katakori to some degree. Spending time on a computer during work (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.82 for 3-6 hours, aOR: 2.48 for > 6 hours), being female (aOR: 3.75), and having unsatisfactory sleep (aOR: 2.92) were potential risk factors for katakori. Comparison of 13 matched pairs showed a significantly stiffer trapezius in subjects with severe katakori symptoms, but no apparent differences in limb/trunk muscle mass. Conclusions: Katakori was particularly prevalent in our hospital staff. Possible risk factors for disabling katakori were doing long-term computer work, being female, and having unsatisfactory sleep. Symptoms seem to be associated with elevated neck muscle stiffness. These findings could guide working condition improvements to mitigate katakori.","PeriodicalId":44831,"journal":{"name":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.2022-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Background: Non-specific pain or discomfort in the neck and shoulder girdle, called katakori in Japanese, is a common, chronic musculoskeletal condition worldwide. However, its various clinical features are incompletely characterized, even among medical professionals. We aimed to clarify factors affecting katakori and to investigate objectively the associated neck muscle stiffness and skeletal muscle volume. Methods: All staff members at our private hospital were surveyed about their lifestyle, physical and mental status, and katakori symptoms, using a self-administered questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore possible katakori risk factors. On secondary assessment, ultrasound elastography of the trapezius muscle as well as limb/trunk muscle mass were compared between subjects with severe symptoms and subjects without katakori, using propensity score matching. Results: Of 359 participants enrolled, nearly 75% had katakori to some degree. Spending time on a computer during work (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.82 for 3-6 hours, aOR: 2.48 for > 6 hours), being female (aOR: 3.75), and having unsatisfactory sleep (aOR: 2.92) were potential risk factors for katakori. Comparison of 13 matched pairs showed a significantly stiffer trapezius in subjects with severe katakori symptoms, but no apparent differences in limb/trunk muscle mass. Conclusions: Katakori was particularly prevalent in our hospital staff. Possible risk factors for disabling katakori were doing long-term computer work, being female, and having unsatisfactory sleep. Symptoms seem to be associated with elevated neck muscle stiffness. These findings could guide working condition improvements to mitigate katakori.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本医院工作人员颈肩痛的临床特征
摘要背景:颈肩带的非特异性疼痛或不适,在日语中被称为katakori,是世界范围内常见的慢性肌肉骨骼疾病。然而,它的各种临床特征甚至在医学专业人员中都没有完全表征。我们旨在阐明影响喀喇昆仑的因素,并客观地研究相关的颈部肌肉僵硬和骨骼肌体积。方法:采用自填问卷对私立医院全体工作人员的生活方式、身心状况和喀喇昆仑症状进行调查。多元逻辑回归分析用于探讨可能的喀喇昆仑危险因素。在二次评估中,使用倾向评分匹配,比较有严重症状的受试者和没有喀喇昆仑的受试对象之间斜方肌以及肢体/躯干肌肉质量的超声弹性成像。结果:在359名参与者中,近75%的人在某种程度上拥有喀喇昆仑。工作期间花时间在电脑上(调整后的比值比[aOR]:1.82持续3-6小时,aOR:2.48持续>6小时)、女性(aOR:3.75)和睡眠不理想(aOR:2.92)是喀喇昆仑的潜在风险因素。对13对匹配的斜方肌进行比较,发现有严重喀喇昆仑症状的受试者斜方肌明显变硬,但肢体/躯干肌肉质量没有明显差异。结论:喀喇昆仑在我们医院的工作人员中特别普遍。长期从事电脑工作、身为女性和睡眠不理想可能是导致《喀喇昆仑经》致残的风险因素。症状似乎与颈部肌肉僵硬有关。这些发现可以指导工作条件的改善,以减轻喀喇昆仑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Comparison of attitudes toward schizophrenia among medical students and health professionals in Japan and their associated factorsamong medical students: a cross-sectional study. Histological outcome evaluation of selected brain preparation protocols for white fiber dissection. Remote Orthotic Fabrication Method Using Small Three-Dimensional Printers and Computed Tomography Data: A Technical Report. Seven cases illustrating difficulties in the treatment of MPO-ANCA-positive refractory otitis media. Subjective Difficulty with Higher-Level Functional Capacity in Community-Dwelling Older People withMild Cognitive Impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1