ON THE ISSUE OF CENSORSHIP: THE CONCEPT, THE SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE STUDY, HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CENSORSHIP ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS IN THE PERIOD OF 1905 – 1917.

E.P. Tsumarava
{"title":"ON THE ISSUE OF CENSORSHIP: THE CONCEPT, THE SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE STUDY, HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CENSORSHIP ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS IN THE PERIOD OF 1905 – 1917.","authors":"E.P. Tsumarava","doi":"10.22281/2413-9912-2023-07-02-126-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the multidimensional nature of the concept of censorship. Among the methods of censorship research, the emphasis was placed on a systematic approach. The works of native and foreign authors on the development of the censorship system in the Russian Empire and its part – censorship on the territory of Belarus in 1905 – 1917 are considered. The aim is to reveal the concept of \"censorship\", the importance of a systematic approach in its study, to highlight the poorly studied areas of censorship in the historiography of the issue. As a result of the research, the author came to the conclusion that at the present stage of the development of knowledge, censorship is perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon, with the attribute of dichotomy and contradictions: on the one hand, censorship is characterized by the suppression of dissent, on the other hand, it is in many ways a measure of freedom of speech and thought. The censorship apparatus is part of censorship and functions as a state regulatory body. From the standpoint of a systematic approach, the author perceives censorship as a system with many components, interrelations between them, its own structure, internal and external environment, equilibrium and non-equilibrium states. Non-equilibrium states of censorship in the studied period are characteristic for the territory of Belarus in 1905, 1907 and in 1917. Censorship was at bifurcation points, in a state of duality, uncertainty and the possibility of several outcomes. The interdependence of public mood and actions with changes in censorship, the influence of the internal and external environment found special expression in these periods. The study revealed that there has been no comprehensive study of censorship on the territory of Belarus in 1905 – 1917 either in native or foreign historiography; therefore there is a need for a detailed development of the functioning of the censorship apparatus, the study of the practice of censoring publications in the period under study.","PeriodicalId":34506,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22281/2413-9912-2023-07-02-126-135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the multidimensional nature of the concept of censorship. Among the methods of censorship research, the emphasis was placed on a systematic approach. The works of native and foreign authors on the development of the censorship system in the Russian Empire and its part – censorship on the territory of Belarus in 1905 – 1917 are considered. The aim is to reveal the concept of "censorship", the importance of a systematic approach in its study, to highlight the poorly studied areas of censorship in the historiography of the issue. As a result of the research, the author came to the conclusion that at the present stage of the development of knowledge, censorship is perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon, with the attribute of dichotomy and contradictions: on the one hand, censorship is characterized by the suppression of dissent, on the other hand, it is in many ways a measure of freedom of speech and thought. The censorship apparatus is part of censorship and functions as a state regulatory body. From the standpoint of a systematic approach, the author perceives censorship as a system with many components, interrelations between them, its own structure, internal and external environment, equilibrium and non-equilibrium states. Non-equilibrium states of censorship in the studied period are characteristic for the territory of Belarus in 1905, 1907 and in 1917. Censorship was at bifurcation points, in a state of duality, uncertainty and the possibility of several outcomes. The interdependence of public mood and actions with changes in censorship, the influence of the internal and external environment found special expression in these periods. The study revealed that there has been no comprehensive study of censorship on the territory of Belarus in 1905 – 1917 either in native or foreign historiography; therefore there is a need for a detailed development of the functioning of the censorship apparatus, the study of the practice of censoring publications in the period under study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于审查制度的问题:1905 - 1917年白俄罗斯境内审查制度运作的概念、系统研究方法和史学研究。
文章分析了审查概念的多维性。在审查制度的研究方法中,侧重于系统的方法。本文考察了国内外作家关于俄罗斯帝国审查制度的发展及其在1905年至1917年白俄罗斯境内审查制度的作用的著作。其目的是揭示“审查”的概念,一个系统的方法在其研究的重要性,以突出审查的研究不足的领域在这个问题的史学。研究结果表明,在知识发展的现阶段,审查被认为是一种多维度的现象,具有二分性和矛盾性:一方面,审查的特点是压制异议,另一方面,它在许多方面是言论和思想自由的衡量标准。审查机构是审查制度的一部分,是国家监管机构。从系统论的角度出发,作者认为审查制度是一个由许多组成部分组成的系统,这些组成部分之间存在相互关系,审查制度本身的结构、内部和外部环境、均衡和非均衡状态。在研究期间,审查制度的不平衡状态是1905年、1907年和1917年白俄罗斯领土的特点。审查制度处于两面性、不确定性和多种结果可能性的两极状态。公众情绪和行动与审查制度的变化、内外环境的影响的相互依存关系在这两个时期得到了特殊的表现。研究表明,无论是在本国还是外国史学中,都没有对1905年至1917年白俄罗斯境内的审查制度进行全面研究;因此,有必要详细发展审查机构的功能,研究在研究期间审查出版物的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
E. JUNGER AND THE ASSERTION OF THE NAZI GOVERNMENT: AN INTELLECTUAL'S SURVIVAL STRATEGY DURING THE YEARS OF NAZI DOMINATION REFLECTION OF THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR IN RUSSIAN HISTORY TEXTBOOKS IN THE FOCUS OF HISTORIOGRAPHY BRITISH PRIME MINISTER FIGHT ROBERT WALPOLE WITH THE OPPOSITION IN THE 20S OF THE XVIII CENTURY. RESEARCH BY ETHNOGRAPH V.A. FALEYEVA OF THE PEASANT COSTUME COMPLEX IN THE PERIOD FROM 1965 - 1971 TRANSFORMATION OF THE STRATEGY OF THE LABOUR PARTY IN THE PROGRAM DOCUMENTS OF 1918.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1