Response

Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.1177/20503032221148466
M. Horii
{"title":"Response","authors":"M. Horii","doi":"10.1177/20503032221148466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am very grateful to Professor Naomi Goldenberg, Dr. Suzanne Owen, and Dr. Alex Henley for their insightful comments and for the time and effort they kindly extended to my book. We four share the understanding that “religion” is a problematic category, and use the so-called “critical religion” approach in our own academic work. At the same time, there are some differences between us. These are expressed in their comments. These differences provide me with valuable insights. Their critical reflections on my book are helpful for the further development of my own study. In the following paragraphs, I would like to give my constructive responses to the comments made by these three scholars.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032221148466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I am very grateful to Professor Naomi Goldenberg, Dr. Suzanne Owen, and Dr. Alex Henley for their insightful comments and for the time and effort they kindly extended to my book. We four share the understanding that “religion” is a problematic category, and use the so-called “critical religion” approach in our own academic work. At the same time, there are some differences between us. These are expressed in their comments. These differences provide me with valuable insights. Their critical reflections on my book are helpful for the further development of my own study. In the following paragraphs, I would like to give my constructive responses to the comments made by these three scholars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
响应
我非常感谢Naomi Goldenberg教授、Suzanne Owen博士和Alex Henley博士的深刻见解,感谢他们为我的书所付出的时间和精力。我们四个人都认为“宗教”是一个有问题的范畴,并在我们自己的学术工作中使用所谓的“批判宗教”方法。与此同时,我们之间也存在一些差异。这些都在他们的评论中表达出来。这些差异为我提供了宝贵的见解。他们对我的书的批判性思考对我自己研究的进一步发展是有帮助的。我愿在以下几段话中,对三位学者的评论作出建设性回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1